fix: data model conventions dead links
This commit is contained in:
parent
080816f659
commit
720b5480e9
|
@ -603,7 +603,7 @@ the same Concept between releases of the Standardized Vocabularies.</li>
|
|||
<li>A descriptive name for each Concept is stored as the Concept Name as
|
||||
part of the CONCEPT table. Additional names and descriptions for the
|
||||
Concept are stored as Synonyms in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
table.</li>
|
||||
<li>Each Concept is assigned to a Domain. For Standard Concepts, there
|
||||
is always a single Domain. Source Concepts can be composite or
|
||||
|
@ -631,7 +631,7 @@ participate in the construction of the CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table and can be
|
|||
used to identify Descendants that may appear in the data. See
|
||||
CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table. Non-standard Concepts can only appear in
|
||||
*_source_concept_id fields and are not used in <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
table. Please refer to the Standardized Vocabularies specifications for
|
||||
details of the Standard Concept designation.</li>
|
||||
<li>The lifespan of a Concept is recorded through its valid_start_date,
|
||||
|
@ -760,12 +760,12 @@ concept_id_1 and concept_id_2 fields.</li>
|
|||
<li>Concept Relationships define direct relationships between Concepts.
|
||||
Indirect relationships through 3rd Concepts are not captured in this
|
||||
table. However, the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
table does this for hierarchical relationships over several
|
||||
“generations” of direct relationships.</li>
|
||||
<li>In previous versions of the CDM, the relationship_id used to be a
|
||||
numerical identifier. See the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#relationship">RELATIONSHIP</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#relationship">RELATIONSHIP</a>
|
||||
table.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ purposes of creating a closed Information Model, where all entities in
|
|||
the OMOP CDM are covered by unique Concepts.</li>
|
||||
<li>Hierarchical Relationships are used to build a hierarchical tree out
|
||||
of the Concepts, which is recorded in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
table. For example, “has_ingredient” is a Relationship between Concept
|
||||
of the Concept Class ‘Clinical Drug’ and those of ‘Ingredient’, and all
|
||||
Ingredients can be classified as the “parental” hierarchical Concepts
|
||||
|
@ -806,16 +806,16 @@ same Vocabulary or those adopted from different Vocabulary sources.</li>
|
|||
<li>The concept_synonym_name field contains a valid Synonym of a
|
||||
concept, including the description in the concept_name itself. I.e. each
|
||||
Concept has at least one Synonym in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
table. As an example, for a SNOMED-CT Concept, if the fully specified
|
||||
name is stored as the concept_name of the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept">CONCEPT</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept">CONCEPT</a>
|
||||
table, then the Preferred Term and Synonyms associated with the Concept
|
||||
are stored in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
table.</li>
|
||||
<li>Only Synonyms that are active and current are stored in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym">CONCEPT_SYNONYM</a>
|
||||
table. Tracking synonym/description history and mapping of obsolete
|
||||
synonyms to current Concepts/Synonyms is out of scope for the Standard
|
||||
Vocabularies.</li>
|
||||
|
@ -827,12 +827,12 @@ Vocabularies.</li>
|
|||
<ul>
|
||||
<li>Each concept is also recorded as an ancestor of itself.</li>
|
||||
<li>Only valid and Standard Concepts participate in the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
table. It is not possible to find ancestors or descendants of deprecated
|
||||
or Source Concepts.</li>
|
||||
<li>Usually, only Concepts of the same Domain are connected through
|
||||
records of the <a
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
href="https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor">CONCEPT_ANCESTOR</a>
|
||||
table, but there might be exceptions.</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ corresponding Concept reference data.
|
|||
- The concept_id of a Concept is persistent, i.e. stays the same for the same Concept between releases of
|
||||
the Standardized Vocabularies.
|
||||
- A descriptive name for each Concept is stored as the Concept Name as part of the CONCEPT table. Additional
|
||||
names and descriptions for the Concept are stored as Synonyms in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym)
|
||||
names and descriptions for the Concept are stored as Synonyms in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym)
|
||||
table.
|
||||
- Each Concept is assigned to a Domain. For Standard Concepts, there is always a single Domain. Source
|
||||
Concepts can be composite or coordinated entities, and therefore can belong to more than one Domain.
|
||||
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ field and can be used to reference the source vocabulary.
|
|||
in all *_concept_id fields, whereas Classification Concepts (‘C’) should not appear in the CDM
|
||||
data, but participate in the construction of the CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table and can be used to
|
||||
identify Descendants that may appear in the data. See CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table. Non-standard
|
||||
Concepts can only appear in *_source_concept_id fields and are not used in [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor)
|
||||
Concepts can only appear in *_source_concept_id fields and are not used in [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor)
|
||||
table. Please refer to the Standardized Vocabularies specifications for details of the Standard Concept
|
||||
designation.
|
||||
- The lifespan of a Concept is recorded through its valid_start_date, valid_end_date and the invalid_
|
||||
|
@ -144,10 +144,10 @@ and the relationship_id replaced by the reverse_relationship_id from the RELATIO
|
|||
not necessary to query for the existence of a relationship both in the concept_id_1 and concept_id_2
|
||||
fields.
|
||||
- Concept Relationships define direct relationships between Concepts. Indirect relationships through 3rd
|
||||
Concepts are not captured in this table. However, the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor) table does this for
|
||||
Concepts are not captured in this table. However, the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor) table does this for
|
||||
hierarchical relationships over several “generations” of direct relationships.
|
||||
- In previous versions of the CDM, the relationship_id used to be a numerical identifier. See the
|
||||
[RELATIONSHIP](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#relationship) table.
|
||||
[RELATIONSHIP](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#relationship) table.
|
||||
|
||||
### Relationship Table
|
||||
- There is one record for each Relationship.
|
||||
|
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ Relationship is provided in the reverse_relationship_id field.
|
|||
concept_id field. This is for purposes of creating a closed Information Model, where all entities in
|
||||
the OMOP CDM are covered by unique Concepts.
|
||||
- Hierarchical Relationships are used to build a hierarchical tree out of the Concepts, which is recorded in
|
||||
the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor) table. For example, “has_ingredient” is a Relationship between Concept
|
||||
the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor) table. For example, “has_ingredient” is a Relationship between Concept
|
||||
of the Concept Class ‘Clinical Drug’ and those of ‘Ingredient’, and all Ingredients can be classified as
|
||||
the “parental” hierarchical Concepts for the drug products they are part of. All ‘Is a’ Relationships are
|
||||
hierarchical.
|
||||
|
@ -172,19 +172,19 @@ from different Vocabulary sources.
|
|||
|
||||
### Concept Synonyms
|
||||
- The concept_synonym_name field contains a valid Synonym of a concept, including the description in
|
||||
the concept_name itself. I.e. each Concept has at least one Synonym in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym)
|
||||
the concept_name itself. I.e. each Concept has at least one Synonym in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym)
|
||||
table. As an example, for a SNOMED-CT Concept, if the fully specified name is stored as the
|
||||
concept_name of the [CONCEPT](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept) table, then the Preferred Term and Synonyms associated with the Concept are stored in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym) table.
|
||||
- Only Synonyms that are active and current are stored in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_synonym) table. Tracking
|
||||
concept_name of the [CONCEPT](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept) table, then the Preferred Term and Synonyms associated with the Concept are stored in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym) table.
|
||||
- Only Synonyms that are active and current are stored in the [CONCEPT_SYNONYM](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_synonym) table. Tracking
|
||||
synonym/description history and mapping of obsolete synonyms to current Concepts/Synonyms is out
|
||||
of scope for the Standard Vocabularies.
|
||||
- Currently, only English Synonyms are included.
|
||||
|
||||
### Concept Ancestor
|
||||
- Each concept is also recorded as an ancestor of itself.
|
||||
- Only valid and Standard Concepts participate in the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor) table. It is not possible
|
||||
- Only valid and Standard Concepts participate in the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor) table. It is not possible
|
||||
to find ancestors or descendants of deprecated or Source Concepts.
|
||||
- Usually, only Concepts of the same Domain are connected through records of the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm531.html#concept_ancestor) table, but there might be exceptions.
|
||||
- Usually, only Concepts of the same Domain are connected through records of the [CONCEPT_ANCESTOR](https://ohdsi.github.io/CommonDataModel/cdm54.html#concept_ancestor) table, but there might be exceptions.
|
||||
|
||||
### Source to Concept Map
|
||||
- This table is no longer used to distribute mapping information between source codes and Standard
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue