Merge pull request #670 from OHDSI/olympians_week3

Olympians week3
This commit is contained in:
clairblacketer 2024-04-17 21:10:11 -04:00 committed by GitHub
commit ab74f34403
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: B5690EEEBB952194
4 changed files with 40 additions and 46 deletions

View File

@ -4596,9 +4596,11 @@ CONCEPT
modifier_source_value modifier_source_value
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing
the modifier code for the procedure that occurred.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference. The value stored here is mapped to a MODIFIER_CONCEPT_ID.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
varchar(50) varchar(50)
@ -5484,15 +5486,10 @@ If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values
are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the Meas Value domain. are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the Meas Value domain.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous If there is no categorial result in the source data, set
results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source
values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and data but without mapping, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to 0, else map to a
the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the CONCEPT_ID.
Meas Value domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is
also the destination for the Maps to value relationship. If theres no
categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if
there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set
value_as_concept_id to 0.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
integer integer
@ -5712,14 +5709,14 @@ VISIT_DETAIL
measurement_source_value measurement_source_value
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents
the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or the measurement that occurred.
Read code.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in
Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID and in the Measurement domain within the
reference. Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for
reference purposes.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
varchar(50) varchar(50)
@ -5753,9 +5750,9 @@ MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can
be consistent across the network. be consistent across the network.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using a
OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source vocabulary supported by OMOP Standardized Vocabularies, insert the
value here. CONCEPT_ID representing the source value here.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
integer integer

View File

@ -4792,9 +4792,11 @@ CONCEPT
modifier_source_value modifier_source_value
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing
the modifier code for the procedure that occurred.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference. The value stored here is mapped to a MODIFIER_CONCEPT_ID.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
varchar(50) varchar(50)
@ -5818,15 +5820,10 @@ If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values
are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the Meas Value domain. are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the Meas Value domain.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous If there is no categorial result in the source data, set
results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source
values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and data but without mapping, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to 0, else map to a
the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the CONCEPT_ID.
Meas Value domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is
also the destination for the Maps to value relationship. If theres no
categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if
there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set
value_as_concept_id to 0.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
integer integer
@ -6046,14 +6043,14 @@ VISIT_DETAIL
measurement_source_value measurement_source_value
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents
the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or the measurement that occurred.
Read code.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in
Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID and in the Measurement domain within the
reference. Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for
reference purposes.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
varchar(50) varchar(50)
@ -6087,9 +6084,9 @@ MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can
be consistent across the network. be consistent across the network.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using a
OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source vocabulary supported by OMOP Standardized Vocabularies, insert the
value here. CONCEPT_ID representing the source value here.
</td> </td>
<td style="text-align:left;"> <td style="text-align:left;">
integer integer

View File

@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ procedure_occurrence,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the p
procedure_occurrence,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,No,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,No,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.",Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.",Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,No,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,No,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,modifier_source_value,No,varchar(50),NA,The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,modifier_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the modifier code for the procedure that occurred.,The value stored here is mapped to a MODIFIER_CONCEPT_ID.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,device_exposure_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to records a person's exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.,Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA device_exposure,device_exposure_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to records a person's exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.,Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,person_id,Yes,integer,NA,NA,No,Yes,PERSON,PERSON_ID,NA,NA,NA device_exposure,person_id,Yes,integer,NA,NA,No,Yes,PERSON,PERSON_ID,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,device_concept_id,Yes,integer,"The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.",The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Device,NA,NA device_exposure,device_concept_id,Yes,integer,"The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.",The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Device,NA,NA
@ -149,15 +149,15 @@ measurement,measurement_time,No,varchar(10),NA,This is present for backwards com
measurement,measurement_type_concept_id,Yes,integer,"This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.","Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=).",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Type Concept,NA,NA measurement,measurement_type_concept_id,Yes,integer,"This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.","Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=).",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Type Concept,NA,NA
measurement,operator_concept_id,No,integer,"The meaning of Concept [4172703](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4172703) for '=' is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it's important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.","Operators are <, <=, =, >=, > and these concepts belong to the 'Meas Value Operator' domain. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Meas+Value+Operator&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). Leave it NULL if there's an exact numeric value given (instead of putting '=') or there's no numeric value at all.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,operator_concept_id,No,integer,"The meaning of Concept [4172703](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4172703) for '=' is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it's important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.","Operators are <, <=, =, >=, > and these concepts belong to the 'Meas Value Operator' domain. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Meas+Value+Operator&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). Leave it NULL if there's an exact numeric value given (instead of putting '=') or there's no numeric value at all.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_as_number,No,float,"This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.",[Convention for negative values](https://ohdsi.github.io/Themis/negative_value_as_number.html),No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_as_number,No,float,"This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.",[Convention for negative values](https://ohdsi.github.io/Themis/negative_value_as_number.html),No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_as_concept_id,No,integer,If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the 'Meas Value' domain.,"If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the 'Meas Value' domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is also the destination for the 'Maps to value' relationship. If there's no categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set value_as_concept_id to 0.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_as_concept_id,No,integer,If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the 'Meas Value' domain.,"If there is no categorial result in the source data, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source data but without mapping, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to 0, else map to a CONCEPT_ID.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,unit_concept_id,No,integer,"At present, there isn't a prescribed unit for individual measurements, such as Hemoglobin A1C, meaning it's not obligatory to express these measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be linked to a Standard Concept within the Unit domain that most accurately reflects the unit provided in the source data.","If the source data does not include units, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to NULL. If units are provided but not mapped, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to 0. Otherwise, map the units to a CONCEPT_ID. Remember that units are case-sensitive in vocabulary.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Unit,NA,NA measurement,unit_concept_id,No,integer,"At present, there isn't a prescribed unit for individual measurements, such as Hemoglobin A1C, meaning it's not obligatory to express these measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be linked to a Standard Concept within the Unit domain that most accurately reflects the unit provided in the source data.","If the source data does not include units, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to NULL. If units are provided but not mapped, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to 0. Otherwise, map the units to a CONCEPT_ID. Remember that units are case-sensitive in vocabulary.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Unit,NA,NA
measurement,range_low,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,range_low,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,range_high,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,range_high,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,provider_id,No,integer,"The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.",The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.,No,Yes,PROVIDER,PROVIDER_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,provider_id,No,integer,"The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.",The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.,No,Yes,PROVIDER,PROVIDER_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the Measurement occurred.,"Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.",No,Yes,VISIT_OCCURRENCE,VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the Measurement occurred.,"Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.",No,Yes,VISIT_OCCURRENCE,VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,measurement_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.",This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,measurement_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the measurement that occurred.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Measurement' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,measurement_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,measurement_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.","If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using a vocabulary supported by OMOP Standardized Vocabularies, insert the CONCEPT_ID representing the source value here.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,unit_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the unit of measurement used.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in UNIT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Unit' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,unit_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the unit of measurement used.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in UNIT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Unit' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .,"If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.",No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .,"If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.",No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
observation,observation_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled.,Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA observation,observation_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled.,Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA

1 cdmTableName cdmFieldName isRequired cdmDatatype userGuidance etlConventions isPrimaryKey isForeignKey fkTableName fkFieldName fkDomain fkClass unique DQ identifiers
124 device_exposure provider_id No integer The Provider associated with device record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who implanted the device. The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. No Yes PROVIDER PROVIDER_ID NA NA NA
125 device_exposure visit_occurrence_id No integer The Visit during which the device was prescribed or given. To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit. No Yes VISIT_OCCURRENCE VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID NA NA NA
126 device_exposure visit_detail_id No integer The Visit Detail during which the device was prescribed or given. To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit detail record. No Yes VISIT_DETAIL VISIT_DETAIL_ID NA NA NA
127 device_exposure device_source_value No varchar(50) This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the device exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code. This code is mapped to a Standard Device Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference. No No NA NA NA NA NA
128 device_exposure device_source_concept_id No integer This is the concept representing the device source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Device necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network. If the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
129 measurement measurement_id Yes integer The unique key given to a Measurement record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Measurements during the same Visit were handled. Each instance of a measurement present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same measurement within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, MEASUREMENT_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled. Yes No NA NA NA NA NA
130 measurement person_id Yes integer The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Measurement is recorded. This may be a system generated code. NA No Yes PERSON PERSON_ID NA NA NA
149 observation observation_id Yes integer The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled. Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. Yes No NA NA NA NA NA
150 observation person_id Yes integer The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Observation is recorded. This may be a system generated code. NA No Yes PERSON PERSON_ID NA NA NA
151 observation observation_concept_id Yes integer The OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. The CONCEPT_ID that the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. There is no specified domain that the Concepts in this table must adhere to. The only rule is that records with Concepts in the Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement, or Device domains MUST go to the corresponding table. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
152 observation observation_date Yes date The date of when the Observation was obtained. Depending on what the Observation represents this could be the date of a lab test, the date of a survey, or the date a patient's family history was taken. For some observations the ETL may need to make a choice as to which date to choose. No No NA NA NA NA NA
153 observation observation_datetime No datetime NA If no time is given set to midnight (00:00:00). No No NA NA NA NA NA
154 observation observation_type_concept_id Yes integer This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources. Choose the OBSERVATION_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID Type Concept NA NA
155 observation value_as_number No float This is the numerical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. It is not expected that all Observations will have numeric results, rather, this field is here to house values should they exist. NA No No NA NA NA NA NA
156 observation value_as_string No varchar(60) This is the categorical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. NA No No NA NA NA NA NA
157 observation value_as_concept_id No Integer It is possible that some records destined for the Observation table have two clinical ideas represented in one source code. This is common with ICD10 codes that describe a family history of some Condition, for example. In OMOP the Vocabulary breaks these two clinical ideas into two codes; one becomes the OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID and the other becomes the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID. It is important when using the Observation table to keep this possibility in mind and to examine the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field for relevant information. Note that the value of VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID may be provided through mapping from a source Concept which contains the content of the Observation. In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the 'Maps to' record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to 'Maps to value'. For example, ICD10 [Z82.4](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/45581076) 'Family history of ischaemic heart disease and other diseases of the circulatory system' has a 'Maps to' relationship to [4167217](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4167217) 'Family history of clinical finding' as well as a 'Maps to value' record to [134057](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/134057) 'Disorder of cardiovascular system'. If there's no categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set value_as_concept_id to 0. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
158 observation qualifier_concept_id No integer This field contains all attributes specifying the clinical fact further, such as as degrees, severities, drug-drug interaction alerts etc. Use your best judgement as to what Concepts to use here and if they are necessary to accurately represent the clinical record. There is no restriction on the domain of these Concepts, they just need to be Standard. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
159 observation unit_concept_id No integer There is currently no recommended unit for individual observation concepts. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data. There is no standardization requirement for units associated with OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit. If the source unit is NULL (applicable to cases when there's no numerical value or when it doesn't require a unit), keep unit_concept_id NULL as well. If there's no mapping of a source unit, populate unit_concept_id with 0. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID Unit NA NA
160 observation provider_id No integer The provider associated with the observation record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result. The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record. No Yes PROVIDER PROVIDER_ID NA NA NA
161 observation visit_occurrence_id No integer The visit during which the Observation occurred. Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If an OBSERVATION_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the observation record. If an observation is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Observation falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates. No Yes VISIT_OCCURRENCE VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID NA NA NA
162 observation visit_detail_id No integer The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Observation occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit. Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID. No Yes VISIT_DETAIL VISIT_DETAIL_ID NA NA NA
163 observation observation_source_value No varchar(50) This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Observation that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code. This code is mapped to a Standard Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference. No No NA NA NA NA NA

View File

@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ procedure_occurrence,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the p
procedure_occurrence,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.",Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.",Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,procedure_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
procedure_occurrence,modifier_source_value,No,varchar(50),NA,The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA procedure_occurrence,modifier_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the modifier code for the procedure that occurred.,The value stored here is mapped to a MODIFIER_CONCEPT_ID.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,device_exposure_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to records a person's exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.,Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA device_exposure,device_exposure_id,Yes,integer,The unique key given to records a person's exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.,Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.,Yes,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,person_id,Yes,integer,NA,NA,No,Yes,PERSON,PERSON_ID,NA,NA,NA device_exposure,person_id,Yes,integer,NA,NA,No,Yes,PERSON,PERSON_ID,NA,NA,NA
device_exposure,device_concept_id,Yes,integer,"The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.",The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Device,NA,NA device_exposure,device_concept_id,Yes,integer,"The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.",The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Device,NA,NA
@ -155,15 +155,15 @@ measurement,measurement_time,No,varchar(10),NA,This is present for backwards com
measurement,measurement_type_concept_id,Yes,integer,"This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.","Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the [vocabulary wiki](https://github.com/OHDSI/Vocabulary-v5.0/wiki/Vocab.-TYPE_CONCEPT).",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Type Concept,NA,NA measurement,measurement_type_concept_id,Yes,integer,"This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.","Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the [vocabulary wiki](https://github.com/OHDSI/Vocabulary-v5.0/wiki/Vocab.-TYPE_CONCEPT).",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Type Concept,NA,NA
measurement,operator_concept_id,No,integer,"The meaning of Concept [4172703](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4172703) for '=' is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it's important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.","Operators are <, <=, =, >=, > and these concepts belong to the 'Meas Value Operator' domain. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Meas+Value+Operator&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). Leave it NULL if there's an exact numeric value given (instead of putting '=') or there's no numeric value at all.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,operator_concept_id,No,integer,"The meaning of Concept [4172703](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4172703) for '=' is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it's important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.","Operators are <, <=, =, >=, > and these concepts belong to the 'Meas Value Operator' domain. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Meas+Value+Operator&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). Leave it NULL if there's an exact numeric value given (instead of putting '=') or there's no numeric value at all.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_as_number,No,float,"This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.",[Convention for negative values](https://ohdsi.github.io/Themis/negative_value_as_number.html),No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_as_number,No,float,"This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.",[Convention for negative values](https://ohdsi.github.io/Themis/negative_value_as_number.html),No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_as_concept_id,No,integer,If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the 'Meas Value' domain.,"If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the 'Meas Value' domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is also the destination for the 'Maps to value' relationship. If there's no categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set value_as_concept_id to 0.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_as_concept_id,No,integer,If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the 'Meas Value' domain.,"If there is no categorial result in the source data, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source data but without mapping, set VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID to 0, else map to a CONCEPT_ID.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,unit_concept_id,No,integer,"At present, there isn't a prescribed unit for individual measurements, such as Hemoglobin A1C, meaning it's not obligatory to express these measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be linked to a Standard Concept within the Unit domain that most accurately reflects the unit provided in the source data.","If the source data does not include units, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to NULL. If units are provided but not mapped, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to 0. Otherwise, map the units to a CONCEPT_ID. Remember that units are case-sensitive in vocabulary.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Unit,NA,NA measurement,unit_concept_id,No,integer,"At present, there isn't a prescribed unit for individual measurements, such as Hemoglobin A1C, meaning it's not obligatory to express these measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be linked to a Standard Concept within the Unit domain that most accurately reflects the unit provided in the source data.","If the source data does not include units, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to NULL. If units are provided but not mapped, set UNIT_CONCEPT_ID to 0. Otherwise, map the units to a CONCEPT_ID. Remember that units are case-sensitive in vocabulary.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,Unit,NA,NA
measurement,range_low,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,range_low,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,range_high,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,range_high,No,float,Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.,If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,provider_id,No,integer,"The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.",The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.,No,Yes,PROVIDER,PROVIDER_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,provider_id,No,integer,"The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.",The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.,No,Yes,PROVIDER,PROVIDER_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the Measurement occurred.,"Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.",No,Yes,VISIT_OCCURRENCE,VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,visit_occurrence_id,No,integer,The visit during which the Measurement occurred.,"Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.",No,Yes,VISIT_OCCURRENCE,VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,visit_detail_id,No,integer,"The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.",Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.,No,Yes,VISIT_DETAIL,VISIT_DETAIL_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,measurement_source_value,No,varchar(50),"This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.",This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,measurement_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the measurement that occurred.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Measurement' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,measurement_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.",If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,measurement_source_concept_id,No,integer,"This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.","If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using a vocabulary supported by OMOP Standardized Vocabularies, insert the CONCEPT_ID representing the source value here.",No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,unit_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the unit of measurement used.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in UNIT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Unit' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,unit_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field contains the exact value from the source data that represents the unit of measurement used.,This value corresponds to a standardized CONCEPT_ID found in UNIT_CONCEPT_ID and in the 'Unit' domain within the Standardized Vocabularies. The original code is retained here for reference purposes.,No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA
measurement,unit_source_concept_id,No,integer,"""This is the concept representing the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using UNIT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.""",If the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA measurement,unit_source_concept_id,No,integer,"""This is the concept representing the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using UNIT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.""",If the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.,No,Yes,CONCEPT,CONCEPT_ID,NA,NA,NA
measurement,value_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .,"If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.",No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA measurement,value_source_value,No,varchar(50),This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .,"If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.",No,No,NA,NA,NA,NA,NA

1 cdmTableName cdmFieldName isRequired cdmDatatype userGuidance etlConventions isPrimaryKey isForeignKey fkTableName fkFieldName fkDomain fkClass unique DQ identifiers
126 device_exposure quantity No integer NA NA No No NA NA NA NA NA
127 device_exposure provider_id No integer The Provider associated with device record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who implanted the device. The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. No Yes PROVIDER PROVIDER_ID NA NA NA
128 device_exposure visit_occurrence_id No integer The Visit during which the device was prescribed or given. To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit. No Yes VISIT_OCCURRENCE VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID NA NA NA
129 device_exposure visit_detail_id No integer The Visit Detail during which the device was prescribed or given. To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit detail record. No Yes VISIT_DETAIL VISIT_DETAIL_ID NA NA NA
130 device_exposure device_source_value No varchar(50) This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the device exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code. This code is mapped to a Standard Device Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference. No No NA NA NA NA NA
131 device_exposure device_source_concept_id No integer This is the concept representing the device source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Device necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network. If the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
132 device_exposure unit_concept_id No integer UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data. There is no standardization requirement for units associated with DEVICE_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit. If the source unit is NULL (applicable to cases when there's no numerical value or when it doesn't require a unit), keep unit_concept_id NULL as well. If there's no mapping of a source unit, populate unit_concept_id with 0. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID Unit NA NA
155 measurement value_source_value No varchar(50) This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data . If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here. No No NA NA NA NA NA
156 measurement measurement_event_id No integer If the Measurement record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record. Put the primary key of the linked record, if applicable, here. No No NA NA NA NA NA
157 measurement meas_event_field_concept_id No integer If the Measurement record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from. Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the MEASUREMENT_EVENT_ID came from. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
158 observation observation_id Yes integer The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled. Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. Yes No NA NA NA NA NA
159 observation person_id Yes integer The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Observation is recorded. This may be a system generated code. NA No Yes PERSON PERSON_ID NA NA NA
160 observation observation_concept_id Yes integer The OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. The CONCEPT_ID that the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. There is no specified domain that the Concepts in this table must adhere to. The only rule is that records with Concepts in the Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement, or Device domains MUST go to the corresponding table. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
161 observation observation_date Yes date The date of when the Observation was obtained. Depending on what the Observation represents this could be the date of a lab test, the date of a survey, or the date a patient's family history was taken. For some observations the ETL may need to make a choice as to which date to choose. No No NA NA NA NA NA
162 observation observation_datetime No datetime NA If no time is given set to midnight (00:00:00). No No NA NA NA NA NA
163 observation observation_type_concept_id Yes integer This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources. Choose the OBSERVATION_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. [Accepted Concepts](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms?domain=Type+Concept&standardConcept=Standard&page=1&pageSize=15&query=). A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the [vocabulary wiki](https://github.com/OHDSI/Vocabulary-v5.0/wiki/Vocab.-TYPE_CONCEPT). No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID Type Concept NA NA
164 observation value_as_number No float This is the numerical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. It is not expected that all Observations will have numeric results, rather, this field is here to house values should they exist. NA No No NA NA NA NA NA
165 observation value_as_string No varchar(60) This is the categorical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. NA No No NA NA NA NA NA
166 observation value_as_concept_id No Integer It is possible that some records destined for the Observation table have two clinical ideas represented in one source code. This is common with ICD10 codes that describe a family history of some Condition, for example. In OMOP the Vocabulary breaks these two clinical ideas into two codes; one becomes the OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID and the other becomes the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID. It is important when using the Observation table to keep this possibility in mind and to examine the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field for relevant information. Note that the value of VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID may be provided through mapping from a source Concept which contains the content of the Observation. In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the 'Maps to' record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to 'Maps to value'. For example, ICD10 [Z82.4](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/45581076) 'Family history of ischaemic heart disease and other diseases of the circulatory system' has a 'Maps to' relationship to [4167217](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/4167217) 'Family history of clinical finding' as well as a 'Maps to value' record to [134057](https://athena.ohdsi.org/search-terms/terms/134057) 'Disorder of cardiovascular system'. If there's no categorial result in a source_data, set value_as_concept_id to NULL, if there is a categorial result in a source_data but without mapping, set value_as_concept_id to 0. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
167 observation qualifier_concept_id No integer This field contains all attributes specifying the clinical fact further, such as as degrees, severities, drug-drug interaction alerts etc. Use your best judgement as to what Concepts to use here and if they are necessary to accurately represent the clinical record. There is no restriction on the domain of these Concepts, they just need to be Standard. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID NA NA NA
168 observation unit_concept_id No integer There is currently no recommended unit for individual observation concepts. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data. There is no standardization requirement for units associated with OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit. If the source unit is NULL (applicable to cases when there's no numerical value or when it doesn't require a unit), keep unit_concept_id NULL as well. If there's no mapping of a source unit, populate unit_concept_id with 0. No Yes CONCEPT CONCEPT_ID Unit NA NA
169 observation provider_id No integer The provider associated with the observation record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result. The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record. No Yes PROVIDER PROVIDER_ID NA NA NA