A Drug Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a particular active ingredient. A Drug Era is not the same as a Drug Exposure: Exposures are individual records corresponding to the source when Drug was delivered to the Person, while successive periods of Drug Exposures are combined under certain rules to produce continuous Drug Eras.
ETL Conventions
The SQL script for generating DRUG_ERA records can be found here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_start_date
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era Start Date is the start date of the first Drug Exposure for a given ingredient, with at least 31 days since the previous exposure.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_end_date
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era End Date is the end date of the last Drug Exposure. The End Date of each Drug Exposure is either taken from the field drug_exposure_end_date or, as it is typically not available, inferred using the following rules: For pharmacy prescription data, the date when the drug was dispensed plus the number of days of supply are used to extrapolate the End Date for the Drug Exposure. Depending on the country-specific healthcare system, this supply information is either explicitly provided in the day_supply field or inferred from package size or similar information. For Procedure Drugs, usually the drug is administered on a single date (i.e., the administration date). A standard Persistence Window of 30 days (gap, slack) is permitted between two subsequent such extrapolated DRUG_EXPOSURE records to be considered to be merged into a single Drug Era.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_count
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gap_days
+
+
+
+
+The Gap Days determine how many total drug-free days are observed between all Drug Exposure events that contribute to a DRUG_ERA record. It is assumed that the drugs are “not stockpiled” by the patient, i.e. that if a new drug prescription or refill is observed (a new DRUG_EXPOSURE record is written), the remaining supply from the previous events is abandoned. The difference between Persistence Window and Gap Days is that the former is the maximum drug-free time allowed between two subsequent DRUG_EXPOSURE records, while the latter is the sum of actual drug-free days for the given Drug Era under the above assumption of non-stockpiling.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOSE_ERA
@@ -700,6 +9313,226 @@ div.tocify {
A Dose Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a constant dose of a specific active ingredient.
ETL Conventions
Dose Eras will be derived from records in the DRUG_EXPOSURE table and the Dose information from the DRUG_STRENGTH table using a standardized algorithm. Dose Form information is not taken into account. So, if the patient changes between different formulations, or different manufacturers with the same formulation, the Dose Era is still spanning the entire time of exposure to the Ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the unit of the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+dose_value
+
+
+The numeric value of the dosage of the drug_ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_start_date
+
+
+The date the Person started on the specific dosage, with at least 31 days since any prior exposure.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_end_date
+
+
+
+
+The date the Person was no longer exposed to the dosage of the specific drug ingredient. An era is ended if there are 31 days or more between dosage records.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONDITION_ERA
@@ -711,6 +9544,198 @@ div.tocify {
ETL Conventions
Each Condition Era corresponds to one or many Condition Occurrence records that form a continuous interval. The condition_concept_id field contains Concepts that are identical to those of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table records that make up the Condition Era. In contrast to Drug Eras, Condition Eras are not aggregated to contain Conditions of different hierarchical layers. The SQl Script for generating CONDITION_ERA records can be found here The Condition Era Start Date is the start date of the first Condition Occurrence. The Condition Era End Date is the end date of the last Condition Occurrence. Condition Eras are built with a Persistence Window of 30 days, meaning, if no occurrence of the same condition_concept_id happens within 30 days of any one occurrence, it will be considered the condition_era_end_date.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_start_date
+
+
+The start date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the start date of the very first chronologically recorded instance of the condition with at least 31 days since any prior record of the same Condition.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_end_date
+
+
+The end date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the end date of the final continuously recorded instance of the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_occurrence_count
+
+
+The number of individual Condition Occurrences used to construct the condition era.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -719,11 +9744,516 @@ div.tocify {
METADATA
Table Description
The METADATA table contains metadata information about a dataset that has been transformed to the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_string
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_datetime
+
+
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CDM_SOURCE
Table Description
The CDM_SOURCE table contains detail about the source database and the process used to transform the data into the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_name
+
+
+The name of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_abbreviation
+
+
+The abbreviation of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(25)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_holder
+
+
+The holder of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_description
+
+
+The description of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_documentation_reference
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_etl_reference
+
+
+
+
+Put the link to the CDM version used.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_release_date
+
+
+The release date of the source data.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_release_date
+
+
+The release data of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_version
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(10)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -734,62 +10264,2396 @@ div.tocify {
The Standardized Vocabularies contains records, or Concepts, that uniquely identify each fundamental unit of meaning used to express clinical information in all domain tables of the CDM. Concepts are derived from vocabularies, which represent clinical information across a domain (e.g. conditions, drugs, procedures) through the use of codes and associated descriptions. Some Concepts are designated Standard Concepts, meaning these Concepts can be used as normative expressions of a clinical entity within the OMOP Common Data Model and within standardized analytics. Each Standard Concept belongs to one domain, which defines the location where the Concept would be expected to occur within data tables of the CDM.
Concepts can represent broad categories (like ‘Cardiovascular disease’), detailed clinical elements (‘Myocardial infarction of the anterolateral wall’) or modifying characteristics and attributes that define Concepts at various levels of detail (severity of a disease, associated morphology, etc.).
Records in the Standardized Vocabularies tables are derived from national or international vocabularies such as SNOMED-CT, RxNorm, and LOINC, or custom Concepts defined to cover various aspects of observational data analysis.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Concept across all domains.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_name
+
+
+An unambiguous, meaningful and descriptive name for the Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the DOMAIN table the Concept belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+DOMAIN
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table indicating from which source the Concept has been adapted.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+The attribute or concept class of the Concept. Examples are ‘Clinical Drug’, ‘Ingredient’, ‘Clinical Finding’ etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT_CLASS
+
+
+
+
+
+
+standard_concept
+
+
+This flag determines where a Concept is a Standard Concept, i.e. is used in the data, a Classification Concept, or a non-standard Source Concept. The allowable values are ‘S’ (Standard Concept) and ‘C’ (Classification Concept), otherwise the content is NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_code
+
+
+The concept code represents the identifier of the Concept in the source vocabulary, such as SNOMED-CT concept IDs, RxNorm RXCUIs etc. Note that concept codes are not unique across vocabularies.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970, meaning, the Concept has no (known) date of inception.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new concept. The default value is 31-Dec-2099, meaning, the Concept is valid until it becomes deprecated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the Concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VOCABULARY
Table Description
The VOCABULARY table includes a list of the Vocabularies collected from various sources or created de novo by the OMOP community. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Vocabulary source and includes a descriptive name and other associated attributes for the Vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Vocabulary, such as ICD9CM, SNOMED, Visit.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_name
+
+
+The name describing the vocabulary, for example, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, Volume 1 and 2 (NCHS) etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_reference
+
+
+External reference to documentation or available download of the about the vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+Version of the Vocabulary as indicated in the source.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Vocabulary the VOCABULARY record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOMAIN
Table Description
The DOMAIN table includes a list of OMOP-defined Domains the Concepts of the Standardized Vocabularies can belong to. A Domain defines the set of allowable Concepts for the standardized fields in the CDM tables. For example, the “Condition” Domain contains Concepts that describe a condition of a patient, and these Concepts can only be stored in the condition_concept_id field of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE and CONDITION_ERA tables. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Domain and includes a descriptive name for the Domain.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A unique key for each domain.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_name
+
+
+The name describing the Domain, e.g. Condition, Procedure, Measurement etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept representing the Domain Concept the DOMAIN record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_CLASS
Table Description
The CONCEPT_CLASS table is a reference table, which includes a list of the classifications used to differentiate Concepts within a given Vocabulary. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+A unique key for each class.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_name
+
+
+The name describing the Concept Class, e.g. Clinical Finding, Ingredient, etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table contains records that define direct relationships between any two Concepts and the nature or type of the relationship. Each type of a relationship is defined in the RELATIONSHIP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+The relationship between CONCEPT_ID_1 and CONCEPT_ID_2. Please see the Vocabulary Conventions. for more information.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is invalidated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the relationship was invalidated. Possible values are ‘D’ (deleted), ‘U’ (updated) or NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The RELATIONSHIP table provides a reference list of all types of relationships that can be used to associate any two concepts in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+The type of relationship captured by the relationship record.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+is_hierarchical
+
+
+Defines whether a relationship defines concepts into classes or hierarchies. Values are 1 for hierarchical relationship or 0 if not.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+defines_ancestry
+
+
+Defines whether a hierarchical relationship contributes to the concept_ancestor table. These are subsets of the hierarchical relationships. Valid values are 1 or 0.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+reverse_relationship_id
+
+
+The identifier for the relationship used to define the reverse relationship between two concepts.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key that refers to an identifier in the CONCEPT table for the unique relationship concept.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_SYNONYM
Table Description
The CONCEPT_SYNONYM table is used to store alternate names and descriptions for Concepts.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_synonym_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1000)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+language_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_ANCESTOR
Table Description
The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table is designed to simplify observational analysis by providing the complete hierarchical relationships between Concepts. Only direct parent-child relationships between Concepts are stored in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table. To determine higher level ancestry connections, all individual direct relationships would have to be navigated at analysis time. The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table includes records for all parent-child relationships, as well as grandparent-grandchild relationships and those of any other level of lineage. Using the CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table allows for querying for all descendants of a hierarchical concept. For example, drug ingredients and drug products are all descendants of a drug class ancestor.
This table is entirely derived from the CONCEPT, CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP and RELATIONSHIP tables.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ancestor_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the higher-level concept that forms the ancestor in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+descendant_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the lower-level concept that forms the descendant in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+min_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The minimum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+max_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The maximum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP
Table Description
The source to concept map table is a legacy data structure within the OMOP Common Data Model, recommended for use in ETL processes to maintain local source codes which are not available as Concepts in the Standardized Vocabularies, and to establish mappings for each source code into a Standard Concept as target_concept_ids that can be used to populate the Common Data Model tables. The SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP table is no longer populated with content within the Standardized Vocabularies published to the OMOP community.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code
+
+
+The source code being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the Source Concept that is being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+This is either 0 or should be a number above 2 billion, which are the Concepts reserved for site-specific codes and mappings.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table defining the vocabulary of the source code that is being translated to a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code_description
+
+
+An optional description for the source code. This is included as a convenience to compare the description of the source code to the name of the concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_concept_id
+
+
+The target Concept to which the source code is being mapped.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_vocabulary_id
+
+
+The Vocabulary of the target Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance was first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new relationship. Default value is 31-Dec-2099.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the mapping instance was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DRUG_STRENGTH
Table Description
The DRUG_STRENGTH table contains structured content about the amount or concentration and associated units of a specific ingredient contained within a particular drug product. This table is supplemental information to support standardized analysis of drug utilization.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Branded Drug or Clinical Drug Product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ingredient_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+Combination Drugs will have more than one record in this table, one for each active Ingredient.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_value
+
+
+The numeric value or the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_value
+
+
+The concentration of the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_value
+
+
+The amount of total liquid (or other divisible product, such as ointment, gel, spray, etc.).
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the denominator unit for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+box_size
+
+
+The number of units of Clinical Branded Drug or Quantified Clinical or Branded Drug contained in a box as dispensed to the patient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when then Concept became invalid.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
COHORT_DEFINITION
Table Description
The COHORT_DEFINITION table contains records defining a Cohort derived from the data through the associated description and syntax and upon instantiation (execution of the algorithm) placed into the COHORT table. Cohorts are a set of subjects that satisfy a given combination of inclusion criteria for a duration of time. The COHORT_DEFINITION table provides a standardized structure for maintaining the rules governing the inclusion of a subject into a cohort, and can store operational programming code to instantiate the cohort within the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_id
+
+
+This is the identifier given to the cohort, usually by the ATLAS application
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_name
+
+
+A short description of the cohort
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_description
+
+
+A complete description of the cohort.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+definition_type_concept_id
+
+
+Type defining what kind of Cohort Definition the record represents and how the syntax may be executed.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_syntax
+
+
+Syntax or code to operationalize the Cohort Definition.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+subject_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a Concept that represents the domain of the subjects that are members of the cohort (e.g., Person, Provider, Visit).
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_initiation_date
+
+
+A date to indicate when the Cohort was initiated in the COHORT table.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
ATTRIBUTE_DEFINITION
Table Description
The ATTRIBUTE_DEFINITION table contains records to define each attribute through an associated description and syntax. Attributes are derived elements that can be selected or calculated for a subject within a cohort. The ATTRIBUTE_DEFINITION table provides a standardized structure for maintaining the rules governing the calculation of covariates for a subject in a cohort, and can store operational programming code to instantiate the attributes for a given cohort within the OMOP Common Data Model.
For each Person, one or more OBSERVATION_PERIOD records may be present, but they will not overlap or be back to back to each other. Events may exist outside all of the time spans of the OBSERVATION_PERIOD records for a patient, however, absence of an Event outside these time spans cannot be construed as evidence of absence of an Event. Incidence or prevalence rates should only be calculated for the time of active OBSERVATION_PERIOD records. When constructing cohorts, outside Events can be used for inclusion criteria definition, but without any guarantee for the performance of these criteria. Also, OBSERVATION_PERIOD records can be as short as a single day, greatly disturbing the denominator of any rate calculation as part of cohort characterizations. To avoid that, apply minimal observation time as a requirement for any cohort definition.
ETL Conventions
Each Person needs to have at least one OBSERVATION_PERIOD record, which should represent time intervals with a high capture rate of Clinical Events. Some source data have very similar concepts, such as enrollment periods in insurance claims data. In other source data such as most EHR systems these time spans need to be inferred under a set of assumptions. It is the discretion of the ETL developer to define these assumptions. In many ETL solutions the start date of the first occurrence or the first high quality occurrence of a Clinical Event (Condition, Drug, Procedure, Device, Measurement, Visit) is defined as the start of the OBSERVATION_PERIOD record, and the end date of the last occurrence of last high quality occurrence of a Clinical Event, or the end of the database period becomes the end of the OBSERVATOIN_PERIOD for each Person. If a Person only has a single Clinical Event the OBSERVATION_PERIOD record can be as short as one day. Depending on these definitions it is possible that Clinical Events fall outside the time spans defined by OBSERVATION_PERIOD records. Family history or history of Clinical Events generally are not used to generate OBSERVATION_PERIOD records around the time they are referring to. Any two overlapping or adjacent OBSERVATION_PERIOD records have to be merged into one.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_id
+
+
+A Person can have multiple discrete Observation Periods which are identified by the Observation_Period_Id.
+
+
+Assign a unique observation_period_id to each discrete Observation Period for a Person.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The Person ID of the PERSON record for which the Observation Period is recorded.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the Observation Period.
+
+
+It is often the case that the idea of Observation Periods does not exist in source data. In those cases, the observation_period_start_date can be inferred as the earliest Event date available for the Person. In insurance claim data, the Observation Period can be considered as the time period the Person is enrolled with a payer. If a Person switches plans but stays with the same payer, and therefore capturing of data continues, that change would be captured in PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_end_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the end date of the period for which we can assume that all events for a Person are recorded.
+
+
+It is often the case that the idea of Observation Periods does not exist in source data. In those cases, the observation_period_end_date can be inferred as the last Event date available for the Person. In insurance claim data, the Observation Period can be considered as the time period the Person is enrolled with a payer.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+period_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation Period as in whether the period was determined from an insurance enrollment file, EHR healthcare encounters, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the observation_period_type_concept_id that best represents how the period was determined. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
VISIT_OCCURRENCE
@@ -608,6 +1303,507 @@ div.tocify {
The Visit duration, or ‘length of stay’, is defined as VISIT_END_DATE - VISIT_START_DATE. For all Visits this is <1 day, except Inpatient Visits and Non-hospital institution Visits. The CDM also contains the VISIT_DETAIL table where additional information about the Visit is stored, for example, transfers between units during an inpatient Visit.
ETL Conventions
Visits can be derived easily if the source data contain coding systems for Place of Service or Procedures, like CPT codes for well visits. In those cases, the codes can be looked up and mapped to a Standard Visit Concept. Otherwise, Visit Concepts have to be identified in the ETL process. This table will contain concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide. Visits can be adjacent to each other, i.e. the end date of one can be identical with the start date of the other. As a consequence, more than one-day Visits or their descendants can be recorded for the same day. Multi-day visits must not overlap, i.e. share days other than start and end days. It is often the case that some logic should be written for how to define visits and how to assign Visit_Concept_Id. For example, in US claims outpatient visits that appear to occur within the time period of an inpatient visit can be rolled into one with the same Visit_Occurrence_Id. In EHR data inpatient visits that are within one day of each other may be strung together to create one visit. It will all depend on the source data and how encounter records should be translated to visit occurrences. Providers can be associated with a Visit through the PROVIDER_ID field, or indirectly through PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE records linked both to the VISIT and PROVIDER tables.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this to identify unique interactions between a person and the health care system. This identifier links across the other CDM event tables to associate events with a visit.
+
+
+This should be populated by creating a unique identifier for each unique interaction between a person and the healthcare system where the person receives a medical good or service over a span of time.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a concept id representing the kind of visit, like inpatient or outpatient. All concepts in this field should be standard and belong to the Visit domain.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the kind of visit that took place for the person. For example this could be “Inpatient Visit”, “Outpatient Visit”, “Ambulatory Visit”, etc. This table will contain standard concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+visit_start_date
+
+
+For inpatient visits, the start date is typically the admission date. For outpatient visits the start date and end date will be the same.
+
+
+When populating VISIT_START_DATE, you should think about the patient experience to make decisions on how to define visits. In the case of an inpatient visit this should be the date the patient was admitted to the hospital or institution. In all other cases this should be the date of the patient-provider interaction.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the start date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_end_date
+
+
+For inpatient visits the end date is typically the discharge date. If a Person is still an inpatient in the hospital at the time of the data extract and does not have a visit_end_date, then set the visit_end_date to the date of the data pull.
+
+
+Visit end dates are mandatory. If end dates are not provided in the source there are three ways in which to derive them: - Outpatient Visit: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime - Emergency Room Visit: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime - Inpatient Visit: Usually there is information about discharge. If not, you should be able to derive the end date from the sudden decline of activity or from the absence of inpatient procedures/drugs. - Non-hospital institution Visits: Particularly for claims data, if end dates are not provided assume the visit is for the duration of month that it occurs. For Inpatient Visits ongoing at the date of ETL, put date of processing the data into visit_end_datetime and visit_type_concept_id with 32220 “Still patient” to identify the visit as incomplete. - All other Visits: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime. If this is a one-day visit the end date should match the start date.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_end_datetime
+
+
+If a Person is still an inpatient in the hospital at the time of the data extract and does not have a visit_end_datetime, then set the visit_end_datetime to the datetime of the data pull.
+
+
+If no time is given for the end date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_type_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to understand the provenance of the visit record, or where the record comes from.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the provenance of the visit record, as in whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+There will only be one provider per visit record and the ETL document should clearly state how they were chosen (attending, admitting, etc.). If there are multiple providers associated with a visit in the source, this can be reflected in the event tables (CONDITION_OCCURRENCE, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE, etc.) or in the VISIT_DETAIL table.
+
+
+If there are multiple providers associated with a visit, you will need to choose which one to put here. The additional providers can be stored in the VISIT_DETAIL table.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This field provides information about the Care Site where the Visit took place.
+
+
+There should only be one Care Site associated with a Visit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the kind of visit that took place (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, etc.)
+
+
+If there is information about the kind of visit in the source data that value should be stored here. If a visit is an amalgamation of visits from the source then use a hierarchy to choose the visit source value, such as IP -> ER-> OP. This should line up with the logic chosen to determine how visits are created.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the visit source value is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was admitted from. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was admitted to the hospital from a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the admitted_from_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. Accepted Concepts. If a person was admitted from home, set this to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was admitted from. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay, like inpatient visits or long-term care visits.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+discharged_to_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was discharged to after a visit. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was transferred to another hospital or sent to a long-term care facility, for example. It is assumed that a person is discharged to home therefore there is not a standard concept id for “home”. Use concept id = 0 when a person is discharged to home.
+
+
+If available, map the discharged_to_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+discharged_to_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was discharged to after a visit, as in they went home or were moved to long-term care. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay of a day or more.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+preceding_visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit that occurred for the person prior to the given visit. There could be a few days or a few years in between.
+
+
+This field can be used to link a visit immediately preceding the current visit. Note this is not symmetrical, and there is no such thing as a “following_visit_id”.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
VISIT_DETAIL
@@ -617,6 +1813,563 @@ div.tocify {
The configuration defining the Visit Detail is described by Concepts in the Visit Domain, which form a hierarchical structure. The Visit Detail record will have an associated to the Visit Occurrence record in two ways: 1. The Visit Detail record will have the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID it is associated to 2. The VISIT_DETAIL_CONCEPT_ID will be a descendant of the VISIT_CONCEPT_ID for the Visit.
ETL Conventions
It is not mandatory that the VISIT_DETAIL table be filled in, but if you find that the logic to create VISIT_OCCURRENCE records includes the roll-up of multiple smaller records to create one picture of a Visit then it is a good idea to use VISIT_DETAIL. In EHR data, for example, a Person may be in the hospital but instead of one over-arching Visit their encounters are recorded as times they interacted with a health care provider. A Person in the hospital interacts with multiple providers multiple times a day so the encounters must be strung together using some heuristic (defined by the ETL) to identify the entire Visit. In this case the encounters would be considered Visit Details and the entire Visit would be the Visit Occurrence. In this example it is also possible to use the Vocabulary to distinguish Visit Details from a Visit Occurrence by setting the VISIT_CONCEPT_ID to 9201 and the VISIT_DETAIL_CONCEPT_IDs either to 9201 or its children to indicate where the patient was in the hospital at the time of care.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+Use this to identify unique interactions between a person and the health care system. This identifier links across the other CDM event tables to associate events with a visit detail.
+
+
+This should be populated by creating a unique identifier for each unique interaction between a person and the healthcare system where the person receives a medical good or service over a span of time.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a concept id representing the kind of visit detail, like inpatient or outpatient. All concepts in this field should be standard and belong to the Visit domain.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the kind of visit that took place for the person. For example this could be “Inpatient Visit”, “Outpatient Visit”, “Ambulatory Visit”, etc. This table will contain standard concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_start_date
+
+
+This is the date of the start of the encounter. This may or may not be equal to the date of the Visit the Visit Detail is associated with.
+
+
+When populating VISIT_DETAIL_START_DATE, you should think about the patient experience to make decisions on how to define visits. Most likely this should be the date of the patient-provider interaction.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the start date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_end_date
+
+
+This the end date of the patient-provider interaction. If a Person is still an inpatient in the hospital at the time of the data extract and does not have a visit_end_date, then set the visit_end_date to the date of the data pull.
+
+
+Visit Detail end dates are mandatory. If end dates are not provided in the source there are three ways in which to derive them: - Outpatient Visit Detail: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime - Emergency Room Visit Detail: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime - Inpatient Visit Detail: Usually there is information about discharge. If not, you should be able to derive the end date from the sudden decline of activity or from the absence of inpatient procedures/drugs. - Non-hospital institution Visit Details: Particularly for claims data, if end dates are not provided assume the visit is for the duration of month that it occurs. For Inpatient Visit Details ongoing at the date of ETL, put date of processing the data into visit_detai_end_datetime and visit_detail_type_concept_id with 32220 “Still patient” to identify the visit as incomplete. All other Visits Details: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_end_datetime
+
+
+If a Person is still an inpatient in the hospital at the time of the data extract and does not have a visit_end_datetime, then set the visit_end_datetime to the datetime of the data pull.
+
+
+If no time is given for the end date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_type_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to understand the provenance of the visit detail record, or where the record comes from.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the provenance of the visit detail record, as in whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+There will only be one provider per visit record and the ETL document should clearly state how they were chosen (attending, admitting, etc.). This is a typical reason for leveraging the VISIT_DETAIL table as even though each VISIT_DETAIL record can only have one provider, there is no limit to the number of VISIT_DETAIL records that can be associated to a VISIT_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+The additional providers associated to a Visit can be stored in this table where each VISIT_DETAIL record represents a different provider.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This field provides information about the Care Site where the Visit Detail took place.
+
+
+There should only be one Care Site associated with a Visit Detail.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the kind of visit detail that took place (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, etc.)
+
+
+If there is information about the kind of visit detail in the source data that value should be stored here. If a visit is an amalgamation of visits from the source then use a hierarchy to choose the VISIT_DETAIL_SOURCE_VALUE, such as IP -> ER-> OP. This should line up with the logic chosen to determine how visits are created.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the VISIT_DETAIL_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was admitted from. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was admitted to the hospital from a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the admitted_from_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. Accepted Concepts. If the person was admitted from home, set this to 0.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was admitted from. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay, like inpatient visits or long-term care visits.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+discharged_to_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was discharged to after a visit, as in they went home or were moved to long-term care. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay of a day or more.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+discharged_to_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was discharged to after a visit. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was transferred to another hospital or sent to a long-term care facility, for example. It is assumed that a person is discharged to home therefore there is not a standard concept id for “home”. Use concept id = 0 when a person is discharged to home.
+
+
+If available, map the DISCHARGE_TO_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Visit domain. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+preceding_visit_detail_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit detail that occurred for the person prior to the given visit detail record. There could be a few days or a few years in between.
+
+
+The PRECEDING_VISIT_DETAIL_ID can be used to link a visit immediately preceding the current Visit Detail. Note this is not symmetrical, and there is no such thing as a “following_visit_id”.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+parent_visit_detail_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit detail that subsumes the given visit detail record. This is used in the case that a visit detail record needs to be nested beyond the VISIT_OCCURRENCE/VISIT_DETAIL relationship.
+
+
+If there are multiple nested levels to how Visits are represented in the source, the VISIT_DETAIL_PARENT_ID can be used to record this relationship.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this field to link the VISIT_DETAIL record to its VISIT_OCCURRENCE.
+
+
+Put the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID that subsumes the VISIT_DETAIL record here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONDITION_OCCURRENCE
@@ -626,6 +2379,481 @@ div.tocify {
Conditions are defined by Concepts from the Condition domain, which form a complex hierarchy. As a result, the same Person with the same disease may have multiple Condition records, which belong to the same hierarchical family. Most Condition records are mapped from diagnostic codes, but recorded signs, symptoms and summary descriptions also contribute to this table. Rule out diagnoses should not be recorded in this table, but in reality their negating nature is not always captured in the source data, and other precautions must be taken when when identifying Persons who should suffer from the recorded Condition. Record all conditions as they exist in the source data. Any decisions about diagnosis/phenotype definitions would be done through cohort specifications. These cohorts can be housed in the COHORT table. Conditions span a time interval from start to end, but are typically recorded as single snapshot records with no end date. The reason is twofold: (i) At the time of the recording the duration is not known and later not recorded, and (ii) the Persons typically cease interacting with the healthcare system when they feel better, which leads to incomplete capture of resolved Conditions. The CONDITION_ERA table addresses this issue. Family history and past diagnoses (‘history of’) are not recorded in this table. Instead, they are listed in the OBSERVATION table. Codes written in the process of establishing the diagnosis, such as ‘question of’ of and ‘rule out’, should not represented here. Instead, they should be recorded in the OBSERVATION table, if they are used for analyses. However, this information is not always available.
ETL Conventions
Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Condition Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_occurrence_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a condition record for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate conditions during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a condition present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same condition within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, CONDITION_OCCURRENCE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the condition is recorded.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_concept_id
+
+
+The CONDITION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source value which represents a condition
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the CONDITION_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. Only records whose source values map to concepts with a domain of “Condition” should go in this table. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition
+
+
+
+
+condition_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the condition
+
+
+Most often data sources do not have the idea of a start date for a condition. Rather, if a source only has one date associated with a condition record it is acceptable to use that date for both the CONDITION_START_DATE and the CONDITION_END_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_end_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the end date of the condition
+
+
+Most often data sources do not have the idea of a start date for a condition. Rather, if a source only has one date associated with a condition record it is acceptable to use that date for both the CONDITION_START_DATE and the CONDITION_END_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Condition record, as in whether the condition was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the CONDITION_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+condition_status_concept_id
+
+
+This concept represents the point during the visit the diagnosis was given (admitting diagnosis, final diagnosis), whether the diagnosis was determined due to laboratory findings, if the diagnosis was exclusionary, or if it was a preliminary diagnosis, among others.
+
+
+Choose the Concept in the Condition Status domain that best represents the point during the visit when the diagnosis was given. These can include admitting diagnosis, principal diagnosis, and secondary diagnosis. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition Status
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason
+
+
+The Stop Reason indicates why a Condition is no longer valid with respect to the purpose within the source data. Note that a Stop Reason does not necessarily imply that the condition is no longer occurring.
+
+
+This information is often not populated in source data and it is a valid etl choice to leave it blank if the information does not exist.
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with condition record, e.g. the provider who made the diagnosis or the provider who recorded the symptom.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the condition occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a CONDITION_START_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the Visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the condition occurred. For example, if the person was in the ICU at the time of the diagnosis the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the condition that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the condition source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Condition necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using CONDITION_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the CONDITION_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_status_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the condition status.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating when and how a diagnosis was given to a patient. This source value is mapped to a standard concept which is stored in the CONDITION_STATUS_CONCEPT_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DRUG_EXPOSURE
@@ -635,6 +2863,664 @@ div.tocify {
The purpose of records in this table is to indicate an exposure to a certain drug as best as possible. In this context a drug is defined as an active ingredient. Drug Exposures are defined by Concepts from the Drug domain, which form a complex hierarchy. As a result, one DRUG_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID may map to multiple standard concept ids if it is a combination product. Records in this table represent prescriptions written, prescriptions dispensed, and drugs administered by a provider to name a few. The DRUG_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID can be used to find and filter on these types. This table includes additional information about the drug products, the quantity given, and route of administration.
ETL Conventions
Information about quantity and dose is provided in a variety of different ways and it is important for the ETL to provide as much information as possible from the data. Depending on the provenance of the data fields may be captured differently i.e. quantity for drugs administered may have a separate meaning from quantity for prescriptions dispensed. If a patient has multiple records on the same day for the same drug or procedures the ETL should not de-dupe them unless there is probable reason to believe the item is a true data duplicate. Take note on how to handle refills for prescriptions written.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_id
+
+
+The unique key given to records of drug dispensings or administrations for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate drugs during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a drug dispensing or administration present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same drug within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, DRUG_EXPOSURE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the drug dispensing or administration is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The DRUG_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a drug product or molecule otherwise introduced to the body. The drug concepts can have a varying degree of information about drug strength and dose. This information is relevant in the context of quantity and administration information in the subsequent fields plus strength information from the DRUG_STRENGTH table, provided as part of the standard vocabulary download.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. The concept id should be derived either from mapping from the source concept id or by picking the drug concept representing the most amount of detail you have. Records whose source values map to standard concepts with a domain of Drug should go in this table. When the Drug Source Value of the code cannot be translated into Standard Drug Concept IDs, a Drug exposure entry is stored with only the corresponding SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID and DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE and a DRUG_CONCEPT_ID of 0. The Drug Concept with the most detailed content of information is preferred during the mapping process. These are indicated in the CONCEPT_CLASS_ID field of the Concept and are recorded in the following order of precedence: ‘Branded Pack’, ‘Clinical Pack’, ‘Branded Drug’, ‘Clinical Drug’, ‘Branded Drug Component’, ‘Clinical Drug Component’, ‘Branded Drug Form’, ‘Clinical Drug Form’, and only if no other information is available ‘Ingredient’. Note: If only the drug class is known, the DRUG_CONCEPT_ID field should contain 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the drug record.
+
+
+Valid entries include a start date of a prescription, the date a prescription was filled, or the date on which a Drug administration was recorded. It is a valid ETL choice to use the date the drug was ordered as the DRUG_EXPOSURE_START_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_end_date
+
+
+The DRUG_EXPOSURE_END_DATE denotes the day the drug exposure ended for the patient.
+
+
+If this information is not explicitly available in the data, infer the end date using the following methods:
1. Start first with duration or days supply using the calculation drug start date + days supply -1 day. 2. Use quantity divided by daily dose that you may obtain from the sig or a source field (or assumed daily dose of 1) for solid, indivisibile, drug products. If quantity represents ingredient amount, quantity divided by daily dose * concentration (from drug_strength) drug concept id tells you the dose form. 3. If it is an administration record, set drug end date equal to drug start date. If the record is a written prescription then set end date to start date + 29. If the record is a mail-order prescription set end date to start date + 89. The end date must be equal to or greater than the start date. Ibuprofen 20mg/mL oral solution concept tells us this is oral solution. Calculate duration as quantity (200 example) * daily dose (5mL) /concentration (20mg/mL) 200*5/20 = 50 days. Examples by dose form
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+verbatim_end_date
+
+
+This is the end date of the drug exposure as it appears in the source data, if it is given
+
+
+Put the end date or discontinuation date as it appears from the source data or leave blank if unavailable.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_type_concept_id
+
+
+You can use the TYPE_CONCEPT_ID to delineate between prescriptions written vs. prescriptions dispensed vs. medication history vs. patient-reported exposure, etc.
+
+
+Choose the drug_type_concept_id that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from a record of a prescription written or physician administered drug. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason
+
+
+The reason a person stopped a medication as it is represented in the source. Reasons include regimen completed, changed, removed, etc. This field will be retired in v6.0.
+
+
+This information is often not populated in source data and it is a valid etl choice to leave it blank if the information does not exist.
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+refills
+
+
+This is only filled in when the record is coming from a prescription written this field is meant to represent intended refills at time of the prescription.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+
+
+To find the dose form of a drug the RELATIONSHIP table can be used where the relationship_id is ‘Has dose form’. If liquid, quantity stands for the total amount dispensed or ordered of ingredient in the units given by the drug_strength table. If the unit from the source data does not align with the unit in the DRUG_STRENGTH table the quantity should be converted to the correct unit given in DRUG_STRENGTH. For clinical drugs with fixed dose forms (tablets etc.) the quantity is the number of units/tablets/capsules prescribed or dispensed (can be partial, but then only 1/2 or 1/3, not 0.01). Clinical drugs with divisible dose forms (injections) the quantity is the amount of ingredient the patient got. For example, if the injection is 2mg/mL but the patient got 80mL then quantity is reported as 160. Quantified clinical drugs with divisible dose forms (prefilled syringes), the quantity is the amount of ingredient similar to clinical drugs. Please see how to calculate drug dose for more information.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+days_supply
+
+
+
+
+Days supply of the drug. This should be the verbatim days_supply as given on the prescription. If the drug is physician administered use duration end date if given or set to 1 as default if duration is not available.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sig
+
+
+This is the verbatim instruction for the drug as written by the provider.
+
+
+Put the written out instructions for the drug as it is verbatim in the source, if available.
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+route_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The standard CONCEPT_ID that the ROUTE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to in the route domain.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Route
+
+
+
+
+lot_number
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider associated with drug record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who administered the drug.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the ordering vs administering physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the drug was prescribed, administered or dispensed.
+
+
+To populate this field drug exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the drug exposure occurred. For example, if the person was in the ICU at the time of the drug administration the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the drug exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Drug Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the drug source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Drug necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DRUG_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+route_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the drug route.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating when and how a drug was given to a patient. This source value is mapped to a standard concept which is stored in the ROUTE_CONCEPT_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the dose unit of the drug given.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating the unit of dosage of drug given to the patient. This is an older column and will be deprecated in an upcoming version.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE
@@ -644,6 +3530,480 @@ div.tocify {
Lab tests are not a procedure, if something is observed with an expected resulting amount and unit then it should be a measurement. Phlebotomy is a procedure but so trivial that it tends to be rarely captured. It can be assumed that there is a phlebotomy procedure associated with many lab tests, therefore it is unnecessary to add them as separate procedures. If the user finds the same procedure over concurrent days, it is assumed those records are part of a procedure lasting more than a day. This logic is in lieu of the procedure_end_date, which will be added in a future version of the CDM.
ETL Conventions
When dealing with duplicate records, the ETL must determine whether to sum them up into one record or keep them separate. Things to consider are: - Same Procedure - Same PROCEDURE_DATETIME - Same Visit Occurrence or Visit Detail - Same Provider - Same Modifier for Procedures. Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Procedure Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_occurrence_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a procedure record for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate procedures during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a procedure occurrence in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same procedure within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the procedure is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_concept_id
+
+
+The PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source value which represents a procedure
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. Only records whose source values map to standard concepts with a domain of “Procedure” should go in this table. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Procedure
+
+
+
+
+procedure_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the date the procedure started.
+
+
+This is meant to be the start date of the procedure. It will be renamed in a future version to PROCEDURE_START_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If the procedure has a start time in the native date, use this field to house that information. This will be renamed in a future version to PROCEDURE_START_DATETIME.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_end_date
+
+
+Use this field to house the date that the procedure ended.
+
+
+This is meant to be the end date of the procedure. It is not required and for most cases will be the same as the PROCEDURE_START_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_end_datetime
+
+
+Use this field to house the datetime that the procedure ended.
+
+
+This is meant to house the end datetime of the procedure and will most often be used in conjunction with the procedure_start_datetime to determine the length of the procedure.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Procedure record, as in whether the procedure was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the PROCEDURE_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. If a procedure is recorded as an EHR encounter, the PROCEDURE_TYPE_CONCEPT would be ‘EHR encounter record’. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+modifier_concept_id
+
+
+The modifiers are intended to give additional information about the procedure but as of now the vocabulary is under review.
+
+
+It is up to the ETL to choose how to map modifiers if they exist in source data. These concepts are typically distinguished by ‘Modifier’ concept classes (e.g., ‘CPT4 Modifier’ as part of the ‘CPT4’ vocabulary). If there is more than one modifier on a record, one should be chosen that pertains to the procedure rather than provider. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+If the quantity value is omitted, a single procedure is assumed.
+
+
+If a Procedure has a quantity of ‘0’ in the source, this should default to ‘1’ in the ETL. If there is a record in the source it can be assumed the exposure occurred at least once
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with the procedure record, e.g. the provider who performed the Procedure.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the procedure occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a PROCEDURE_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the Visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.
+
+
+Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+modifier_source_value
+
+
+
+
+The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DEVICE_EXPOSURE
@@ -653,6 +4013,559 @@ div.tocify {
The distinction between Devices or supplies and Procedures are sometimes blurry, but the former are physical objects while the latter are actions, often to apply a Device or supply.
ETL Conventions
Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Device Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_id
+
+
+The unique key given to records a person’s exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.
+
+
+Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_concept_id
+
+
+The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Device
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the device record.
+
+
+Valid entries include a start date of a procedure to implant a device, the date of a prescription for a device, or the date of device administration.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_end_date
+
+
+The DEVICE_EXPOSURE_END_DATE denotes the day the device exposure ended for the patient, if given.
+
+
+Put the end date or discontinuation date as it appears from the source data or leave blank if unavailable.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_type_concept_id
+
+
+You can use the TYPE_CONCEPT_ID to denote the provenance of the record, as in whether the record is from administrative claims or EHR.
+
+
+Choose the drug_type_concept_id that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from a record of a prescription written or physician administered drug. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+unique_device_id
+
+
+This is the Unique Device Identification (UDI-DI) number for devices regulated by the FDA, if given.
+
+
+For medical devices that are regulated by the FDA, a Unique Device Identification (UDI) is provided if available in the data source and is recorded in the UNIQUE_DEVICE_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+production_id
+
+
+This is the Production Identifier (UDI-PI) portion of the Unique Device Identification.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider associated with device record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who implanted the device.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the device was prescribed or given.
+
+
+To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The Visit Detail during which the device was prescribed or given.
+
+
+To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit detail record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the device exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Device Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the device source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Device necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data.
+
+
+There is no standardization requirement for units associated with DEVICE_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit. If there is no unit associated with a Device record, set to NULL.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the unit of the Device. For example, blood transfusions are considered devices and can be given in mL quantities.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference. Using the blood transfusion example, blood transfusion is represented by the DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID and the unit (mL) would be housed in the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE and mapped to a standard concept in the unit domain.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Unit necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using UNIT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
MEASUREMENT
@@ -662,6 +4575,674 @@ div.tocify {
Measurements are predominately lab tests with a few exceptions, like blood pressure or function tests. Results are given in the form of a value and unit combination. When investigating measurements, look for operator_concept_ids (<, >, etc.).
ETL Conventions
Only records where the source value maps to a Concept in the measurement domain should be included in this table. Even though each Measurement always has a result, the fields VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are not mandatory as often the result is not given in the source data. When the result is not known, the Measurement record represents just the fact that the corresponding Measurement was carried out, which in itself is already useful information for some use cases. For some Measurement Concepts, the result is included in the test. For example, ICD10 CONCEPT_ID 45548980 ‘Abnormal level of unspecified serum enzyme’ indicates a Measurement and the result (abnormal). In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the ‘Maps to’ record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to ‘Maps to value’. In this example, the ‘Maps to’ relationship directs to 4046263 ‘Enzyme measurement’ as well as a ‘Maps to value’ record to 4135493 ‘Abnormal’.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a Measurement record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Measurements during the same Visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a measurement present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same measurement within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, MEASUREMENT_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Measurement is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_concept_id
+
+
+The MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. Only records whose SOURCE_CONCEPT_IDs map to Standard Concepts with a domain of “Measurement” should go in this table.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Measurement
+
+
+
+
+measurement_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the date of the measurement.
+
+
+If there are multiple dates in the source data associated with a record such as order_date, draw_date, and result_date, choose the one that is closest to the date the sample was drawn from the patient.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_time
+
+
+
+
+This is present for backwards compatibility and will be deprecated in an upcoming version.
+
+
+varchar(10)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+operator_concept_id
+
+
+The meaning of Concept 4172703 for ‘=’ is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it’s important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.
+
+
+Operators are =, > and these concepts belong to the ‘Meas Value Operator’ domain. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_number
+
+
+This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.
+
+
+If there is a negative value coming from the source, set the VALUE_AS_NUMBER to NULL, with the exception of the following Measurements (listed as LOINC codes): - 1925-7 Base excess in Arterial blood by calculation - 1927-3 Base excess in Venous blood by calculation - 8632-2 QRS-Axis - 11555-0 Base excess in Blood by calculation - 1926-5 Base excess in Capillary blood by calculation - 28638-5 Base excess in Arterial cord blood by calculation 28639-3 Base excess in Venous cord blood by calculation
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the ‘Meas Value’ domain.
+
+
+If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the ‘Meas Value’ domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is also the destination for the ‘Maps to value’ relationship.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+There is currently no recommended unit for individual measurements, i.e. it is not mandatory to represent Hemoglobin a1C measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data.
+
+
+There is no standardization requirement for units associated with MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+range_low
+
+
+Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.
+
+
+If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+range_high
+
+
+Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.
+
+
+If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the Measurement occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the unit of the Measurement that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_concept_id
+
+
+“This is the concept representing the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using UNIT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.”
+
+
+If the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .
+
+
+If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_event_id
+
+
+If the Measurement record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record.
+
+
+Put the primary key of the linked record, if applicable, here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+meas_event_field_concept_id
+
+
+If the Measurement record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the MEASUREMENT_EVENT_ID came from.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
OBSERVATION
@@ -671,11 +5252,846 @@ div.tocify {
Observations differ from Measurements in that they do not require a standardized test or some other activity to generate clinical fact. Typical observations are medical history, family history, the stated need for certain treatment, social circumstances, lifestyle choices, healthcare utilization patterns, etc. If the generation clinical facts requires a standardized testing such as lab testing or imaging and leads to a standardized result, the data item is recorded in the MEASUREMENT table. If the clinical fact observed determines a sign, symptom, diagnosis of a disease or other medical condition, it is recorded in the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table. Valid Observation Concepts are not enforced to be from any domain though they still should be Standard Concepts.
ETL Conventions
Records whose Source Values map to any domain besides Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement or Device should be stored in the Observation table. Observations can be stored as attribute value pairs, with the attribute as the Observation Concept and the value representing the clinical fact. This fact can be a Concept (stored in VALUE_AS_CONCEPT), a numerical value (VALUE_AS_NUMBER), a verbatim string (VALUE_AS_STRING), or a datetime (VALUE_AS_DATETIME). Even though Observations do not have an explicit result, the clinical fact can be stated separately from the type of Observation in the VALUE_AS_* fields. It is recommended for Observations that are suggestive statements of positive assertion should have a value of ‘Yes’ (concept_id=4188539), recorded, even though the null value is the equivalent.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_id
+
+
+The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Observation is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_concept_id
+
+
+The OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. There is no specified domain that the Concepts in this table must adhere to. The only rule is that records with Concepts in the Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement, or Device domains MUST go to the corresponding table.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_date
+
+
+The date of the Observation. Depending on what the Observation represents this could be the date of a lab test, the date of a survey, or the date a patient’s family history was taken.
+
+
+For some observations the ETL may need to make a choice as to which date to choose.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given set to midnight (00:00:00).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the OBSERVATION_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+value_as_number
+
+
+This is the numerical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. It is not expected that all Observations will have numeric results, rather, this field is here to house values should they exist.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_string
+
+
+This is the categorical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(60)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+It is possible that some records destined for the Observation table have two clinical ideas represented in one source code. This is common with ICD10 codes that describe a family history of some Condition, for example. In OMOP the Vocabulary breaks these two clinical ideas into two codes; one becomes the OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID and the other becomes the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID. It is important when using the Observation table to keep this possibility in mind and to examine the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field for relevant information.
+
+
+Note that the value of VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID may be provided through mapping from a source Concept which contains the content of the Observation. In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the ‘Maps to’ record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to ‘Maps to value’. For example, ICD10 Z82.4 ‘Family history of ischaemic heart disease and other diseases of the circulatory system’ has a ‘Maps to’ relationship to 4167217 ‘Family history of clinical finding’ as well as a ‘Maps to value’ record to 134057 ‘Disorder of cardiovascular system’.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+qualifier_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains all attributes specifying the clinical fact further, such as as degrees, severities, drug-drug interaction alerts etc.
+
+
+Use your best judgement as to what Concepts to use here and if they are necessary to accurately represent the clinical record. There is no restriction on the domain of these Concepts, they just need to be Standard.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+There is currently no recommended unit for individual observation concepts. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data.
+
+
+There is no standardization requirement for units associated with OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with the observation record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the Observation occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If an OBSERVATION_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the observation record. If an observation is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Observation falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Observation occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Observation that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Observation necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the unit of the Observation that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+qualifier_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the qualifier of the Observation that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim result value of the Observation from the source data. Do not get confused with the Observation_source_value which captures source value of the observation mapped to observation_concept_id. This field is the observation result value from the source.
+
+
+If the observation_source_value was a question, for example, or an observation that requires a result then this field is the answer/ result from the source data. Store the verbatim value that represents the result of the observation_source_value.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_event_id
+
+
+If the Observation record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record.
+
+If the Observation record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the OBSERVATION_EVENT_ID came from.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
DEATH
Table Description
The death domain contains the clinical event for how and when a Person dies. A person can have up to one record if the source system contains evidence about the Death, such as: Condition in an administrative claim, status of enrollment into a health plan, or explicit record in EHR data.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+death_date
+
+
+The date the person was deceased.
+
+
+If the precise date include day or month is not known or not allowed, December is used as the default month, and the last day of the month the default day.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+death_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If not available set time to midnight (00:00:00)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+death_type_concept_id
+
+
+This is the provenance of the death record, i.e., where it came from. It is possible that an administrative claims database would source death information from a government file so do not assume the Death Type is the same as the Visit Type, etc.
+
+
+Use the type concept that be reflects the source of the death record. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+cause_concept_id
+
+
+This is the Standard Concept representing the Person’s cause of death, if available.
+
+
+There is no specified domain for this concept, just choose the Standard Concept Id that best represents the person’s cause of death.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cause_source_value
+
+
+
+
+If available, put the source code representing the cause of death here.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cause_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the cause of death was coded using a Vocabulary present in the OMOP Vocabularies put the CONCEPT_ID representing the cause of death here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
NOTE
@@ -691,11 +6107,878 @@ div.tocify {
Role: Characterizes the training or professional level of the author of the document, but does not break down to specialty or subspecialty (e.g. Physician) Each combination of these 5 dimensions rolls up to a unique LOINC code.
According to CDO requirements, only 2 of the 5 dimensions are required to properly annotate a document; Kind of Document and any one of the other 4 dimensions. However, not all the permutations of the CDO dimensions will necessarily yield an existing LOINC code. Each of these dimensions are contained in the OMOP Vocabulary under the domain of ‘Meas Value’ with each dimension represented as a Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each note.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_date
+
+
+The date the note was recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If time is not given set the time to midnight.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_type_concept_id
+
+
+The provenance of the note. Most likely this will be EHR.
+
+
+Put the source system of the note, as in EHR record. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+note_class_concept_id
+
+
+A Standard Concept Id representing the HL7 LOINC Document Type Vocabulary classification of the note.
+
+
+Map the note classification to a Standard Concept. For more information see the ETL Conventions in the description of the NOTE table. Accepted Concepts. This Concept can alternatively be represented by concepts with the relationship ‘Kind of (LOINC)’ to 706391 (Note).
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_title
+
+
+The title of the note.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_text
+
+
+The content of the note.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+encoding_concept_id
+
+
+This is the Concept representing the character encoding type.
+
+
+Put the Concept Id that represents the encoding character type here. Currently the only option is UTF-8 (32678). It the note is encoded in any other type, like ASCII then put 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+language_concept_id
+
+
+The language of the note.
+
+
+Use Concepts that are descendants of the concept 4182347 (World Languages).
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider who wrote the note.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a determination on which provider to put here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the note was written.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The Visit Detail during which the note was written.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_source_value
+
+
+
+
+The source value mapped to the NOTE_CLASS_CONCEPT_ID.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_event_id
+
+
+If the Note record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record.
+
+
+Put the primary key of the linked record, if applicable, here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_event_field_concept_id
+
+
+If the Note record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the NOTE_EVENT_ID came from.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
NOTE_NLP
Table Description
The NOTE_NLP table encodes all output of NLP on clinical notes. Each row represents a single extracted term from a note.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for the NLP record.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_id
+
+
+This is the NOTE_ID for the NOTE record the NLP record is associated to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+section_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The SECTION_CONCEPT_ID should be used to represent the note section contained in the NOTE_NLP record. These concepts can be found as parts of document panels and are based on the type of note written, i.e. a discharge summary. These panels can be found as concepts with the relationship ‘Subsumes’ to CONCEPT_ID 45875957.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+snippet
+
+
+A small window of text surrounding the term
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+“offset”
+
+
+Character offset of the extracted term in the input note
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+lexical_variant
+
+
+Raw text extracted from the NLP tool.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_system
+
+
+
+
+Name and version of the NLP system that extracted the term. Useful for data provenance.
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_date
+
+
+The date of the note processing.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_datetime
+
+
+The date and time of the note processing.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_exists
+
+
+
+
+Term_exists is defined as a flag that indicates if the patient actually has or had the condition. Any of the following modifiers would make Term_exists false: Negation = true Subject = [anything other than the patient] Conditional = true/li> Rule_out = true Uncertain = very low certainty or any lower certainties A complete lack of modifiers would make Term_exists true.
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_temporal
+
+
+
+
+Term_temporal is to indicate if a condition is present or just in the past. The following would be past:
- History = true - Concept_date = anything before the time of the report
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_modifiers
+
+
+
+
+For the modifiers that are there, they would have to have these values:
- Negation = false - Subject = patient - Conditional = false - Rule_out = false - Uncertain = true or high or moderate or even low (could argue about low). Term_modifiers will concatenate all modifiers for different types of entities (conditions, drugs, labs etc) into one string. Lab values will be saved as one of the modifiers.
+
+
+varchar(2000)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SPECIMEN
@@ -703,6 +6986,436 @@ div.tocify {
The specimen domain contains the records identifying biological samples from a person.
ETL Conventions
Anatomic site is coded at the most specific level of granularity possible, such that higher level classifications can be derived using the Standardized Vocabularies.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_id
+
+
+Unique identifier for each specimen.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The person from whom the specimen is collected.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The standard CONCEPT_ID that the SPECIMEN_SOURCE_VALUE maps to in the specimen domain. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+Put the source of the specimen record, as in an EHR system. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+specimen_date
+
+
+The date the specimen was collected.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_datetime
+
+
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+The amount of specimen collected from the person.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+The unit for the quantity of the specimen.
+
+
+Map the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+anatomic_site_concept_id
+
+
+This is the site on the body where the specimen is from.
+
+
+Map the ANATOMIC_SITE_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Spec Anatomic Site domain. This should be coded at the lowest level of granularity Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+disease_status_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_source_id
+
+
+This is the identifier for the specimen from the source system.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_source_value
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This unit for the quantity of the specimen, as represented in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+anatomic_site_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This is the site on the body where the specimen was taken from, as represented in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+disease_status_source_value
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
FACT_RELATIONSHIP
@@ -710,6 +7423,169 @@ div.tocify {
The FACT_RELATIONSHIP table contains records about the relationships between facts stored as records in any table of the CDM. Relationships can be defined between facts from the same domain, or different domains. Examples of Fact Relationships include: Person relationships (parent-child), care site relationships (hierarchical organizational structure of facilities within a health system), indication relationship (between drug exposures and associated conditions), usage relationships (of devices during the course of an associated procedure), or facts derived from one another (measurements derived from an associated specimen).
ETL Conventions
All relationships are directional, and each relationship is represented twice symmetrically within the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table. For example, two persons if person_id = 1 is the mother of person_id = 2 two records are in the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table (all strings in fact concept_id records in the Concept table: - Person, 1, Person, 2, parent of - Person, 2, Person, 1, child of
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+fact_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+fact_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -722,6 +7598,352 @@ div.tocify {
The current iteration of the LOCATION table is US centric. Until a major release to correct this, certain fields can be used to represent different international values.
- STATE can also be used for province or district - ZIP is also the postal code or postcode - COUNTY can also be used to represent region
ETL Conventions
Each address or Location is unique and is present only once in the table. Locations do not contain names, such as the name of a hospital. In order to construct a full address that can be used in the postal service, the address information from the Location needs to be combined with information from the Care Site.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a unique Location.
+
+
+Each instance of a Location in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+address_1
+
+
+This is the first line of the address.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+address_2
+
+
+This is the second line of the address
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+city
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+state
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(2)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+zip
+
+
+
+
+Zip codes are handled as strings of up to 9 characters length. For US addresses, these represent either a 3-digit abbreviated Zip code as provided by many sources for patient protection reasons, the full 5-digit Zip or the 9-digit (ZIP + 4) codes. Unless for specific reasons analytical methods should expect and utilize only the first 3 digits. For international addresses, different rules apply.
+
+
+varchar(9)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+county
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_source_value
+
+
+
+
+Put the verbatim value for the location here, as it shows up in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+country_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the country. Values should conform to the Geography domain.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+country_source_value
+
+
+The name of the country.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(80)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+latitude
+
+
+
+
+Must be between -90 and 90.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+longitude
+
+
+
+
+Must be between -180 and 180.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CARE_SITE
@@ -729,6 +7951,200 @@ div.tocify {
The CARE_SITE table contains a list of uniquely identified institutional (physical or organizational) units where healthcare delivery is practiced (offices, wards, hospitals, clinics, etc.).
ETL Conventions
Care site is a unique combination of location_id and place_of_service_source_value. Care site does not take into account the provider (human) information such a specialty. Many source data do not make a distinction between individual and institutional providers. The CARE_SITE table contains the institutional providers. If the source, instead of uniquely identifying individual Care Sites, only provides limited information such as Place of Service, generic or “pooled” Care Site records are listed in the CARE_SITE table. There can be hierarchical and business relationships between Care Sites. For example, wards can belong to clinics or departments, which can in turn belong to hospitals, which in turn can belong to hospital systems, which in turn can belong to HMOs.The relationships between Care Sites are defined in the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+
+
+Assign an ID to each combination of a location and nature of the site - the latter could be the Place of Service, name or another characteristic in your source data.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_name
+
+
+The name of the care_site as it appears in the source data
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+place_of_service_concept_id
+
+
+This is a high-level way of characterizing a Care Site. Typically, however, Care Sites can provide care in multiple settings (inpatient, outpatient, etc.) and this granularity should be reflected in the visit.
+
+
+Choose the concept in the visit domain that best represents the setting in which healthcare is provided in the Care Site. If most visits in a Care Site are Inpatient, then the place_of_service_concept_id should represent Inpatient. If information is present about a unique Care Site (e.g. Pharmacy) then a Care Site record should be created. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_id
+
+
+The location_id from the LOCATION table representing the physical location of the care_site.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+LOCATION
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_source_value
+
+
+The identifier of the care_site as it appears in the source data. This could be an identifier separate from the name of the care_site.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+place_of_service_source_value
+
+
+
+
+Put the place of service of the care_site as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
PROVIDER
@@ -736,6 +8152,393 @@ div.tocify {
The PROVIDER table contains a list of uniquely identified healthcare providers. These are individuals providing hands-on healthcare to patients, such as physicians, nurses, midwives, physical therapists etc.
User Guide
Many sources do not make a distinction between individual and institutional providers. The PROVIDER table contains the individual providers. If the source, instead of uniquely identifying individual providers, only provides limited information such as specialty, generic or ‘pooled’ Provider records are listed in the PROVIDER table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+It is assumed that every provider with a different unique identifier is in fact a different person and should be treated independently.
+
+
+This identifier can be the original id from the source data provided it is an integer, otherwise it can be an autogenerated number.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_name
+
+
+
+
+This field is not necessary as it is not necessary to have the actual identity of the Provider. Rather, the idea is to uniquely and anonymously identify providers of care across the database.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+npi
+
+
+This is the National Provider Number issued to health care providers in the US by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dea
+
+
+This is the identifier issued by the DEA, a US federal agency, that allows a provider to write prescriptions for controlled substances.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_concept_id
+
+
+This field either represents the most common specialty that occurs in the data or the most specific concept that represents all specialties listed, should the provider have more than one. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists.
+
+
+If a Provider has more than one Specialty, there are two options: 1. Choose a concept_id which is a common ancestor to the multiple specialties, or, 2. Choose the specialty that occurs most often for the provider. Concepts in this field should be Standard with a domain of Provider. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This is the CARE_SITE_ID for the location that the provider primarily practices in.
+
+
+If a Provider has more than one Care Site, the main or most often exerted CARE_SITE_ID should be recorded.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+year_of_birth
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the recorded gender of the provider in the source data.
+
+
+If given, put a concept from the gender domain representing the recorded gender of the provider. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Gender
+
+
+
+
+provider_source_value
+
+
+Use this field to link back to providers in the source data. This is typically used for error checking of ETL logic.
+
+
+Some use cases require the ability to link back to providers in the source data. This field allows for the storing of the provider identifier as it appears in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_source_value
+
+
+This is the kind of provider or specialty as it appears in the source data. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists.
+
+
+Put the kind of provider as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is often zero as many sites use proprietary codes to store physician speciality.
+
+
+If the source data codes provider specialty in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_source_value
+
+
+This is provider’s gender as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+Put the provider’s gender as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is often zero as many sites use proprietary codes to store provider gender.
+
+
+If the source data codes provider gender in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -746,6 +8549,498 @@ div.tocify {
The PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD table captures details of the period of time that a Person is continuously enrolled under a specific health Plan benefit structure from a given Payer. Each Person receiving healthcare is typically covered by a health benefit plan, which pays for (fully or partially), or directly provides, the care. These benefit plans are provided by payers, such as health insurances or state or government agencies. In each plan the details of the health benefits are defined for the Person or her family, and the health benefit Plan might change over time typically with increasing utilization (reaching certain cost thresholds such as deductibles), plan availability and purchasing choices of the Person. The unique combinations of Payer organizations, health benefit Plans and time periods in which they are valid for a Person are recorded in this table.
User Guide
A Person can have multiple, overlapping, Payer_Plan_Periods in this table. For example, medical and drug coverage in the US can be represented by two Payer_Plan_Periods. The details of the benefit structure of the Plan is rarely known, the idea is just to identify that the Plans are different.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each unique combination of a Person, Payer, Plan, and Period of time.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The Person covered by the Plan.
+
+
+A single Person can have multiple, overlapping, PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD records
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_start_date
+
+
+Start date of Plan coverage.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_end_date
+
+
+End date of Plan coverage.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the organization who reimburses the provider which administers care to the Person.
+
+
+Map the Payer directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same payer, though the name of the Payer is not necessary. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_source_value
+
+
+This is the Payer as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the Payer in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the specific health benefit Plan the Person is enrolled in.
+
+
+Map the Plan directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same health benefit Plan though the name of the Plan is not necessary. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_source_value
+
+
+This is the health benefit Plan of the Person as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the Plan in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the sponsor of the Plan who finances the Plan. This includes self-insured, small group health plan and large group health plan.
+
+
+Map the sponsor directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same sponsor though the name of the sponsor is not necessary. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_source_value
+
+
+The Plan sponsor as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the sponsor in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+family_source_value
+
+
+The common identifier for all people (often a family) that covered by the same policy.
+
+
+Often these are the common digits of the enrollment id of the policy members.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the reason the Person left the Plan, if known.
+
+
+Map the stop reason directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_source_value
+
+
+The Plan stop reason as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the stop reason in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
COST
@@ -756,6 +9051,598 @@ div.tocify {
When dealing with summary costs, the cost of the goods or services the provider provides is often not known directly, but derived from the hospital charges multiplied by an average cost-to-charge ratio.
ETL Conventions
One cost record is generated for each response by a payer. In a claims databases, the payment and payment terms reported by the payer for the goods or services billed will generate one cost record. If the source data has payment information for more than one payer (i.e. primary insurance and secondary insurance payment for one entity), then a cost record is created for each reporting payer. Therefore, it is possible for one procedure to have multiple cost records for each payer, but typically it contains one or no record per entity. Payer reimbursement cost records will be identified by using the PAYER_PLAN_ID field. Drug costs are composed of ingredient cost (the amount charged by the wholesale distributor or manufacturer), the dispensing fee (the amount charged by the pharmacy and the sales tax).
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_event_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_domain_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+DOMAIN
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+currency_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+total_charge
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+total_cost
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+total_paid
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_by_payer
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_by_patient
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_patient_copay
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_patient_coinsurance
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_patient_deductible
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_by_primary
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_ingredient_cost
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_dispensing_fee
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_allowed
+
+
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+revenue_code_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+revenue_code_source_value
+
+
+Revenue codes are a method to charge for a class of procedures and conditions in the U.S. hospital system.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drg_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drg_source_value
+
+
+Diagnosis Related Groups are US codes used to classify hospital cases into one of approximately 500 groups.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(3)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -766,6 +9653,223 @@ div.tocify {
A Drug Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a particular active ingredient. A Drug Era is not the same as a Drug Exposure: Exposures are individual records corresponding to the source when Drug was delivered to the Person, while successive periods of Drug Exposures are combined under certain rules to produce continuous Drug Eras.
ETL Conventions
The SQL script for generating DRUG_ERA records can be found here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_start_date
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era Start Date is the start date of the first Drug Exposure for a given ingredient, with at least 31 days since the previous exposure.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_end_date
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era End Date is the end date of the last Drug Exposure. The End Date of each Drug Exposure is either taken from the field drug_exposure_end_date or, as it is typically not available, inferred using the following rules: For pharmacy prescription data, the date when the drug was dispensed plus the number of days of supply are used to extrapolate the End Date for the Drug Exposure. Depending on the country-specific healthcare system, this supply information is either explicitly provided in the day_supply field or inferred from package size or similar information. For Procedure Drugs, usually the drug is administered on a single date (i.e., the administration date). A standard Persistence Window of 30 days (gap, slack) is permitted between two subsequent such extrapolated DRUG_EXPOSURE records to be considered to be merged into a single Drug Era.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_count
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gap_days
+
+
+
+
+The Gap Days determine how many total drug-free days are observed between all Drug Exposure events that contribute to a DRUG_ERA record. It is assumed that the drugs are “not stockpiled” by the patient, i.e. that if a new drug prescription or refill is observed (a new DRUG_EXPOSURE record is written), the remaining supply from the previous events is abandoned. The difference between Persistence Window and Gap Days is that the former is the maximum drug-free time allowed between two subsequent DRUG_EXPOSURE records, while the latter is the sum of actual drug-free days for the given Drug Era under the above assumption of non-stockpiling.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOSE_ERA
@@ -773,6 +9877,226 @@ div.tocify {
A Dose Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a constant dose of a specific active ingredient.
ETL Conventions
Dose Eras will be derived from records in the DRUG_EXPOSURE table and the Dose information from the DRUG_STRENGTH table using a standardized algorithm. Dose Form information is not taken into account. So, if the patient changes between different formulations, or different manufacturers with the same formulation, the Dose Era is still spanning the entire time of exposure to the Ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the unit of the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+dose_value
+
+
+The numeric value of the dosage of the drug_ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_start_date
+
+
+The date the Person started on the specific dosage, with at least 31 days since any prior exposure.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_end_date
+
+
+
+
+The date the Person was no longer exposed to the dosage of the specific drug ingredient. An era is ended if there are 31 days or more between dosage records.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONDITION_ERA
@@ -784,6 +10108,198 @@ div.tocify {
ETL Conventions
Each Condition Era corresponds to one or many Condition Occurrence records that form a continuous interval. The condition_concept_id field contains Concepts that are identical to those of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table records that make up the Condition Era. In contrast to Drug Eras, Condition Eras are not aggregated to contain Conditions of different hierarchical layers. The SQl Script for generating CONDITION_ERA records can be found here The Condition Era Start Date is the start date of the first Condition Occurrence. The Condition Era End Date is the end date of the last Condition Occurrence. Condition Eras are built with a Persistence Window of 30 days, meaning, if no occurrence of the same condition_concept_id happens within 30 days of any one occurrence, it will be considered the condition_era_end_date.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_start_date
+
+
+The start date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the start date of the very first chronologically recorded instance of the condition with at least 31 days since any prior record of the same Condition.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_end_date
+
+
+The end date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the end date of the final continuously recorded instance of the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_occurrence_count
+
+
+The number of individual Condition Occurrences used to construct the condition era.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
EPISODE
@@ -791,6 +10307,395 @@ div.tocify {
The EPISODE table aggregates lower-level clinical events (VISIT_OCCURRENCE, DRUG_EXPOSURE, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE, DEVICE_EXPOSURE) into a higher-level abstraction representing clinically and analytically relevant disease phases,outcomes and treatments. The EPISODE_EVENT table connects qualifying clinical events (VISIT_OCCURRENCE, DRUG_EXPOSURE, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE, DEVICE_EXPOSURE) to the appropriate EPISODE entry. For example cancers including their development over time, their treatment, and final resolution.
User Guide
Valid Episode Concepts belong to the ‘Episode’ domain. For cancer episodes please see [article], for non-cancer episodes please see [article]. If your source data does not have all episodes that are relevant to the therapeutic area, write only those you can easily derive from the data. It is understood that that table is not currently expected to be comprehensive.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Episode.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the episode is recorded.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_concept_id
+
+
+The EPISODE_CONCEPT_ID represents the kind abstraction related to the disease phase, outcome or treatment.
+
+
+Choose a concept in the Episode domain that best represents the ongoing disease phase, outcome, or treatment. Please see [article] for cancers and [article] for non-cancers describing how these are defined. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Episode
+
+
+
+
+episode_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Episode beings.
+
+
+Please see [article] for how to define an Episode start date.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_start_datetime
+
+
+The date and time when the Episode begins.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_end_date
+
+
+The date when the instance of the Episode is considered to have ended.
+
+
+Please see [article] for how to define an Episode end date.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_end_datetime
+
+
+The date when the instance of the Episode is considered to have ended.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_parent_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the Episode that subsumes the given Episode record. This is used in the case that an Episode are nested into each other.
+
+
+If there are multiple nested levels to how Episodes are represented, the EPISODE_PARENT_ID can be used to record this relationship.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_number
+
+
+For sequences of episodes, this is used to indicate the order the episodes occurred. For example, lines of treatment could be indicated here.
+
+
+Please see [article] for the details of how to count episodes.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_object_concept_id
+
+
+A Standard Concept representing the disease phase, outcome, or other abstraction of which the episode consists. For example, if the EPISODE_CONCEPT_ID is treatment regimen then the EPISODE_OBJECT_CONCEPT_ID should contain the chemotherapy regimen concept, like Afatinib monotherapy.
+
+
+Episode entries from the ‘Disease Episode’ concept class should have an episode_object_concept_id that comes from the Condition domain. Episode entries from the ‘Treatment Episode’ concept class should have an episode_object_concept_id that scome from the ‘Procedure’ domain or ‘Regimen’ concept class.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Procedure, Regimen
+
+
+
+
+episode_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Episode record, as in whether the episode was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the EPISODE_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record. Accepted Concepts. A more detailed explanation of each Type Concept can be found on the vocabulary wiki.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+episode_source_value
+
+
+The source code for the Episdoe as it appears in the source data. This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_source_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key to a Episode Concept that refers to the code used in the source.
+
+
+Given that the Episodes are user-defined it is unlikely that there will be a Source Concept available. If that is the case then set this field to zero.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
EPISODE_EVENT
@@ -800,6 +10705,125 @@ div.tocify {
This connecting table is used instead of the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table for linking low-level events to abstracted Episodes.
ETL Conventions
Some episodes may not have links to any underlying clinical events. For such episodes, the EPISODE_EVENT table is not populated.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_id
+
+
+Use this field to link the EPISODE_EVENT record to its EPISODE.
+
+
+Put the EPISODE_ID that subsumes the EPISODE_EVENT record here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+EPISODE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+event_id
+
+
+This field is the primary key of the linked record in the database. For example, if the Episode Event is a Condition Occurrence, then the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE_ID of the linked record goes in this field.
+
+
+Put the primary key of the linked record here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+episode_event_field_concept_id
+
+
+This field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the EVENT_ID came from. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Metadata
+
+
+
+
@@ -808,11 +10832,598 @@ div.tocify {
METADATA
Table Description
The METADATA table contains metadata information about a dataset that has been transformed to the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a Metadata record.
+
+
+Attribute value is auto-generated
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_string
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_number
+
+
+This is the numerical value of the result of the Metadata, if applicable and available. It is not expected that all Metadata will have numeric results, rather, this field is here to house values should they exist.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_datetime
+
+
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CDM_SOURCE
Table Description
The CDM_SOURCE table contains detail about the source database and the process used to transform the data into the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_name
+
+
+The name of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_abbreviation
+
+
+The abbreviation of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(25)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_holder
+
+
+The holder of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_description
+
+
+The description of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_documentation_reference
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_etl_reference
+
+
+
+
+Put the link to the CDM version used.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_release_date
+
+
+The release date of the source data.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_release_date
+
+
+The release data of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_version
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(10)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_version_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the version of the CDM.
+
+
+You can find all concepts that represent the CDM versions using the query: SELECT * FROM CONCEPT WHERE VOCABULARY_ID = ‘CDM’ AND CONCEPT_CLASS = ‘CDM’
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+
+
+You can find the version of your Vocabulary using the query: SELECT vocabulary_version from vocabulary where vocabulary_id = ‘None’
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -823,52 +11434,2006 @@ div.tocify {
The Standardized Vocabularies contains records, or Concepts, that uniquely identify each fundamental unit of meaning used to express clinical information in all domain tables of the CDM. Concepts are derived from vocabularies, which represent clinical information across a domain (e.g. conditions, drugs, procedures) through the use of codes and associated descriptions. Some Concepts are designated Standard Concepts, meaning these Concepts can be used as normative expressions of a clinical entity within the OMOP Common Data Model and within standardized analytics. Each Standard Concept belongs to one domain, which defines the location where the Concept would be expected to occur within data tables of the CDM.
Concepts can represent broad categories (like ‘Cardiovascular disease’), detailed clinical elements (‘Myocardial infarction of the anterolateral wall’) or modifying characteristics and attributes that define Concepts at various levels of detail (severity of a disease, associated morphology, etc.).
Records in the Standardized Vocabularies tables are derived from national or international vocabularies such as SNOMED-CT, RxNorm, and LOINC, or custom Concepts defined to cover various aspects of observational data analysis.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Concept across all domains.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_name
+
+
+An unambiguous, meaningful and descriptive name for the Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the DOMAIN table the Concept belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+DOMAIN
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table indicating from which source the Concept has been adapted.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+The attribute or concept class of the Concept. Examples are ‘Clinical Drug’, ‘Ingredient’, ‘Clinical Finding’ etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT_CLASS
+
+
+
+
+
+
+standard_concept
+
+
+This flag determines where a Concept is a Standard Concept, i.e. is used in the data, a Classification Concept, or a non-standard Source Concept. The allowable values are ‘S’ (Standard Concept) and ‘C’ (Classification Concept), otherwise the content is NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_code
+
+
+The concept code represents the identifier of the Concept in the source vocabulary, such as SNOMED-CT concept IDs, RxNorm RXCUIs etc. Note that concept codes are not unique across vocabularies.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970, meaning, the Concept has no (known) date of inception.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new concept. The default value is 31-Dec-2099, meaning, the Concept is valid until it becomes deprecated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the Concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VOCABULARY
Table Description
The VOCABULARY table includes a list of the Vocabularies collected from various sources or created de novo by the OMOP community. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Vocabulary source and includes a descriptive name and other associated attributes for the Vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Vocabulary, such as ICD9CM, SNOMED, Visit.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_name
+
+
+The name describing the vocabulary, for example, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, Volume 1 and 2 (NCHS) etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_reference
+
+
+External reference to documentation or available download of the about the vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+Version of the Vocabulary as indicated in the source.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Vocabulary the VOCABULARY record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOMAIN
Table Description
The DOMAIN table includes a list of OMOP-defined Domains the Concepts of the Standardized Vocabularies can belong to. A Domain defines the set of allowable Concepts for the standardized fields in the CDM tables. For example, the “Condition” Domain contains Concepts that describe a condition of a patient, and these Concepts can only be stored in the condition_concept_id field of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE and CONDITION_ERA tables. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Domain and includes a descriptive name for the Domain.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A unique key for each domain.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_name
+
+
+The name describing the Domain, e.g. Condition, Procedure, Measurement etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept representing the Domain Concept the DOMAIN record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_CLASS
Table Description
The CONCEPT_CLASS table is a reference table, which includes a list of the classifications used to differentiate Concepts within a given Vocabulary. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+A unique key for each class.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_name
+
+
+The name describing the Concept Class, e.g. Clinical Finding, Ingredient, etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table contains records that define direct relationships between any two Concepts and the nature or type of the relationship. Each type of a relationship is defined in the RELATIONSHIP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+The relationship between CONCEPT_ID_1 and CONCEPT_ID_2. Please see the Vocabulary Conventions. for more information.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is invalidated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the relationship was invalidated. Possible values are ‘D’ (deleted), ‘U’ (updated) or NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The RELATIONSHIP table provides a reference list of all types of relationships that can be used to associate any two concepts in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+The type of relationship captured by the relationship record.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+is_hierarchical
+
+
+Defines whether a relationship defines concepts into classes or hierarchies. Values are 1 for hierarchical relationship or 0 if not.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+defines_ancestry
+
+
+Defines whether a hierarchical relationship contributes to the concept_ancestor table. These are subsets of the hierarchical relationships. Valid values are 1 or 0.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+reverse_relationship_id
+
+
+The identifier for the relationship used to define the reverse relationship between two concepts.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key that refers to an identifier in the CONCEPT table for the unique relationship concept.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_SYNONYM
Table Description
The CONCEPT_SYNONYM table is used to store alternate names and descriptions for Concepts.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_synonym_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1000)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+language_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_ANCESTOR
Table Description
The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table is designed to simplify observational analysis by providing the complete hierarchical relationships between Concepts. Only direct parent-child relationships between Concepts are stored in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table. To determine higher level ancestry connections, all individual direct relationships would have to be navigated at analysis time. The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table includes records for all parent-child relationships, as well as grandparent-grandchild relationships and those of any other level of lineage. Using the CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table allows for querying for all descendants of a hierarchical concept. For example, drug ingredients and drug products are all descendants of a drug class ancestor.
This table is entirely derived from the CONCEPT, CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP and RELATIONSHIP tables.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ancestor_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the higher-level concept that forms the ancestor in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+descendant_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the lower-level concept that forms the descendant in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+min_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The minimum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+max_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The maximum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP
Table Description
The source to concept map table is a legacy data structure within the OMOP Common Data Model, recommended for use in ETL processes to maintain local source codes which are not available as Concepts in the Standardized Vocabularies, and to establish mappings for each source code into a Standard Concept as target_concept_ids that can be used to populate the Common Data Model tables. The SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP table is no longer populated with content within the Standardized Vocabularies published to the OMOP community.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code
+
+
+The source code being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the Source Concept that is being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+This is either 0 or should be a number above 2 billion, which are the Concepts reserved for site-specific codes and mappings.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table defining the vocabulary of the source code that is being translated to a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code_description
+
+
+An optional description for the source code. This is included as a convenience to compare the description of the source code to the name of the concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_concept_id
+
+
+The target Concept to which the source code is being mapped.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_vocabulary_id
+
+
+The Vocabulary of the target Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance was first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new relationship. Default value is 31-Dec-2099.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the mapping instance was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DRUG_STRENGTH
Table Description
The DRUG_STRENGTH table contains structured content about the amount or concentration and associated units of a specific ingredient contained within a particular drug product. This table is supplemental information to support standardized analysis of drug utilization.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Branded Drug or Clinical Drug Product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ingredient_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+Combination Drugs will have more than one record in this table, one for each active Ingredient.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_value
+
+
+The numeric value or the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_value
+
+
+The concentration of the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_value
+
+
+The amount of total liquid (or other divisible product, such as ointment, gel, spray, etc.).
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the denominator unit for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+box_size
+
+
+The number of units of Clinical Branded Drug or Quantified Clinical or Branded Drug contained in a box as dispensed to the patient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when then Concept became invalid.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
COHORT
@@ -876,11 +13441,365 @@ div.tocify {
The COHORT table contains records of subjects that satisfy a given set of criteria for a duration of time. The definition of the cohort is contained within the COHORT_DEFINITION table. It is listed as part of the RESULTS schema because it is a table that users of the database as well as tools such as ATLAS need to be able to write to. The CDM and Vocabulary tables are all read-only so it is suggested that the COHORT and COHORT_DEFINTION tables are kept in a separate schema to alleviate confusion.
ETL Conventions
Cohorts typically include patients diagnosed with a specific condition, patients exposed to a particular drug, but can also be Providers who have performed a specific Procedure. Cohort records must have a Start Date and an End Date, but the End Date may be set to Start Date or could have an applied censor date using the Observation Period Start Date. Cohort records must contain a Subject Id, which can refer to the Person, Provider, Visit record or Care Site though they are most often Person Ids. The Cohort Definition will define the type of subject through the subject concept id. A subject can belong (or not belong) to a cohort at any moment in time. A subject can only have one record in the cohort table for any moment of time, i.e. it is not possible for a person to contain multiple records indicating cohort membership that are overlapping in time
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+subject_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_start_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_end_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
COHORT_DEFINITION
Table Description
The COHORT_DEFINITION table contains records defining a Cohort derived from the data through the associated description and syntax and upon instantiation (execution of the algorithm) placed into the COHORT table. Cohorts are a set of subjects that satisfy a given combination of inclusion criteria for a duration of time. The COHORT_DEFINITION table provides a standardized structure for maintaining the rules governing the inclusion of a subject into a cohort, and can store operational programming code to instantiate the cohort within the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_id
+
+
+This is the identifier given to the cohort, usually by the ATLAS application
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_name
+
+
+A short description of the cohort
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_description
+
+
+A complete description of the cohort.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+definition_type_concept_id
+
+
+Type defining what kind of Cohort Definition the record represents and how the syntax may be executed.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_syntax
+
+
+Syntax or code to operationalize the Cohort Definition.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+subject_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a Concept that represents the domain of the subjects that are members of the cohort (e.g., Person, Provider, Visit).
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_initiation_date
+
+
+A date to indicate when the Cohort was initiated in the COHORT table.
+
For each Person, one or more OBSERVATION_PERIOD records may be present, but they will not overlap or be back to back to each other. Events may exist outside all of the time spans of the OBSERVATION_PERIOD records for a patient, however, absence of an Event outside these time spans cannot be construed as evidence of absence of an Event. Incidence or prevalence rates should only be calculated for the time of active OBSERVATION_PERIOD records. When constructing cohorts, outside Events can be used for inclusion criteria definition, but without any guarantee for the performance of these criteria. Also, OBSERVATION_PERIOD records can be as short as a single day, greatly disturbing the denominator of any rate calculation as part of cohort characterizations. To avoid that, apply minimal observation time as a requirement for any cohort definition.
ETL Conventions
Each Person needs to have at least one OBSERVATION_PERIOD record, which should represent time intervals with a high capture rate of Clinical Events. Some source data have very similar concepts, such as enrollment periods in insurance claims data. In other source data such as most EHR systems these time spans need to be inferred under a set of assumptions. It is the discretion of the ETL developer to define these assumptions. In many ETL solutions the start date of the first occurrence or the first high quality occurrence of a Clinical Event (Condition, Drug, Procedure, Device, Measurement, Visit) is defined as the start of the OBSERVATION_PERIOD record, and the end date of the last occurrence of last high quality occurrence of a Clinical Event, or the end of the database period becomes the end of the OBSERVATOIN_PERIOD for each Person. If a Person only has a single Clinical Event the OBSERVATION_PERIOD record can be as short as one day. Depending on these definitions it is possible that Clinical Events fall outside the time spans defined by OBSERVATION_PERIOD records. Family history or history of Clinical Events generally are not used to generate OBSERVATION_PERIOD records around the time they are referring to. Any two overlapping or adjacent OBSERVATION_PERIOD records have to be merged into one.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_id
+
+
+A Person can have multiple discrete Observation Periods which are identified by the Observation_Period_Id.
+
+
+Assign a unique observation_period_id to each discrete Observation Period for a Person.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The Person ID of the PERSON record for which the Observation Period is recorded.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the Observation Period
+
+
+It is often the case that the idea of Observation Periods does not exist in source data. In those cases, the observation_period_start_date can be inferred as the earliest Event date available for the Person. In insurance claim data, the Observation Period can be considered as the time period the Person is enrolled with a payer. If a Person switches plans but stays with the same payer, and therefore capturing of data continues, that change would be captured in PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_period_end_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the end date of the period for which we can assume that all events for a Person are recorded.
+
+
+It is often the case that the idea of Observation Periods does not exist in source data. In those cases, the observation_period_end_date can be inferred as the last Event date available for the Person. In insurance claim data, the Observation Period can be considered as the time period the Person is enrolled with a payer.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+period_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation Period as in whether the period was determined from an insurance enrollment file, EHR healthcare encounters, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the observation_period_type_concept_id that best represents how the period was determined. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
VISIT_OCCURRENCE
@@ -552,6 +1272,506 @@ div.tocify {
The Visit duration, or ‘length of stay’, is defined as VISIT_END_DATE - VISIT_START_DATE. For all Visits this is <1 day, except Inpatient Visits and Non-hospital institution Visits. The CDM also contains the VISIT_DETAIL table where additional information about the Visit is stored, for example, transfers between units during an inpatient Visit.
ETL Conventions
Visits can be derived easily if the source data contain coding systems for Place of Service or Procedures, like CPT codes for well visits. In those cases, the codes can be looked up and mapped to a Standard Visit Concept. Otherwise, Visit Concepts have to be identified in the ETL process. This table will contain concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide. Visits can be adjacent to each other, i.e. the end date of one can be identical with the start date of the other. As a consequence, more than one-day Visits or their descendants can be recorded for the same day. Multi-day visits must not overlap, i.e. share days other than start and end days. It is often the case that some logic should be written for how to define visits and how to assign Visit_Concept_Id. For example, in US claims outpatient visits that appear to occur within the time period of an inpatient visit can be rolled into one with the same Visit_Occurrence_Id. In EHR data inpatient visits that are within one day of each other may be strung together to create one visit. It will all depend on the source data and how encounter records should be translated to visit occurrences. Providers can be associated with a Visit through the PROVIDER_ID field, or indirectly through PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE records linked both to the VISIT and PROVIDER tables.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this to identify unique interactions between a person and the health care system. This identifier links across the other CDM event tables to associate events with a visit.
+
+
+This should be populated by creating a unique identifier for each unique interaction between a person and the healthcare system where the person receives a medical good or service over a span of time.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a concept id representing the kind of visit, like inpatient or outpatient. All concepts in this field should be standard and belong to the Visit domain.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the kind of visit that took place for the person. For example this could be “Inpatient Visit”, “Outpatient Visit”, “Ambulatory Visit”, etc. This table will contain standard concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+visit_start_date
+
+
+For inpatient visits, the start date is typically the admission date. For outpatient visits the start date and end date will be the same.
+
+
+When populating visit_start_date, you should think about the patient experience to make decisions on how to define visits. In the case of an inpatient visit this should be the date the patient was admitted to the hospital or institution. In all other cases this should be the date of the patient-provider interaction.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the start date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_end_date
+
+
+For inpatient visits the end date is typically the discharge date.
+
+
+Visit end dates are mandatory. If end dates are not provided in the source there are three ways in which to derive them: Outpatient Visit: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime Emergency Room Visit: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime Inpatient Visit: Usually there is information about discharge. If not, you should be able to derive the end date from the sudden decline of activity or from the absence of inpatient procedures/drugs. Non-hospital institution Visits: Particularly for claims data, if end dates are not provided assume the visit is for the duration of month that it occurs. For Inpatient Visits ongoing at the date of ETL, put date of processing the data into visit_end_datetime and visit_type_concept_id with 32220 “Still patient” to identify the visit as incomplete. All other Visits: visit_end_datetime = visit_start_datetime. If this is a one-day visit the end date should match the start date.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the end date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_type_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to understand the provenance of the visit record, or where the record comes from.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the provenance of the visit record, as in whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+There will only be one provider per visit record and the ETL document should clearly state how they were chosen (attending, admitting, etc.). If there are multiple providers associated with a visit in the source, this can be reflected in the event tables (CONDITION_OCCURRENCE, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE, etc.) or in the VISIT_DETAIL table.
+
+
+If there are multiple providers associated with a visit, you will need to choose which one to put here. The additional providers can be stored in the visit_detail table.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This field provides information about the care site where the visit took place.
+
+
+There should only be one care site associated with a visit.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the kind of visit that took place (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, etc.)
+
+
+If there is information about the kind of visit in the source data that value should be stored here. If a visit is an amalgamation of visits from the source then use a hierarchy to choose the visit source value, such as IP -> ER-> OP. This should line up with the logic chosen to determine how visits are created.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the visit source value is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was admitted from. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was admitted to the hospital from a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the admitted_from_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. If not available set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was admitted from. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay, like inpatient visits or long-term care visits.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+discharge_to_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was discharged to after a visit. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was discharged to home or sent to a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the discharge_to_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. If not available set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+discharge_to_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was discharged to after a visit, as in they went home or were moved to long-term care. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay of a day or more.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+preceding_visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit that occurred for the person prior to the given visit. There could be a few days or a few years in between.
+
+
+The preceding_visit_id can be used to link a visit immediately preceding the current visit. Note this is not symmetrical, and there is no such thing as a “following_visit_id”.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
VISIT_DETAIL
@@ -561,6 +1781,562 @@ div.tocify {
The configuration defining the Visit Detail is described by Concepts in the Visit Domain, which form a hierarchical structure. The Visit Detail record will have an associated to the Visit Occurrence record in two ways: 1. The Visit Detail record will have the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID it is associated to 2. The VISIT_DETAIL_CONCEPT_ID will be a descendant of the VISIT_CONCEPT_ID for the Visit.
ETL Conventions
It is not mandatory that the VISIT_DETAIL table be filled in, but if you find that the logic to create VISIT_OCCURRENCE records includes the roll-up of multiple smaller records to create one picture of a Visit then it is a good idea to use VISIT_DETAIL. In EHR data, for example, a Person may be in the hospital but instead of one over-arching Visit their encounters are recorded as times they interacted with a health care provider. A Person in the hospital interacts with multiple providers multiple times a day so the encounters must be strung together using some heuristic (defined by the ETL) to identify the entire Visit. In this case the encounters would be considered Visit Details and the entire Visit would be the Visit Occurrence. In this example it is also possible to use the Vocabulary to distinguish Visit Details from a Visit Occurrence by setting the VISIT_CONCEPT_ID to 9201 and the VISIT_DETAIL_CONCEPT_IDs either to 9201 or its children to indicate where the patient was in the hospital at the time of care.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+Use this to identify unique interactions between a person and the health care system. This identifier links across the other CDM event tables to associate events with a visit detail.
+
+
+This should be populated by creating a unique identifier for each unique interaction between a person and the healthcare system where the person receives a medical good or service over a span of time.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a concept id representing the kind of visit detail, like inpatient or outpatient. All concepts in this field should be standard and belong to the Visit domain.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the kind of visit that took place for the person. For example this could be “Inpatient Visit”, “Outpatient Visit”, “Ambulatory Visit”, etc. This table will contain standard concepts in the Visit domain. These concepts are arranged in a hierarchical structure to facilitate cohort definitions by rolling up to generally familiar Visits adopted in most healthcare systems worldwide. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_start_date
+
+
+This is the date of the start of the encounter. This may or may not be equal to the date of the Visit the Visit Detail is associated with.
+
+
+When populating visit_start_date, you should think about the patient experience to make decisions on how to define visits. Most likely this should be the date of the patient-provider interaction.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the start date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_end_date
+
+
+This the end date of the patient-provider interaction.
+
+
+Visit Detail end dates are mandatory. If end dates are not provided in the source there are three ways in which to derive them:<br> - Outpatient Visit Detail: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime - Emergency Room Visit Detail: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime - Inpatient Visit Detail: Usually there is information about discharge. If not, you should be able to derive the end date from the sudden decline of activity or from the absence of inpatient procedures/drugs. - Non-hospital institution Visit Details: Particularly for claims data, if end dates are not provided assume the visit is for the duration of month that it occurs.<br> For Inpatient Visit Details ongoing at the date of ETL, put date of processing the data into visit_detai_end_datetime and visit_detail_type_concept_id with 32220 “Still patient” to identify the visit as incomplete. All other Visits Details: visit_detail_end_datetime = visit_detail_start_datetime.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given for the end date of a visit, set it to midnight (00:00:0000).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_type_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to understand the provenance of the visit detail record, or where the record comes from.
+
+
+Populate this field based on the provenance of the visit detail record, as in whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+There will only be one provider per visit record and the ETL document should clearly state how they were chosen (attending, admitting, etc.). This is a typical reason for leveraging the VISIT_DETAIL table as even though each VISIT_DETAIL record can only have one provider, there is no limit to the number of VISIT_DETAIL records that can be associated to a VISIT_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+The additional providers associated to a Visit can be stored in this table where each VISIT_DETAIL record represents a different provider.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This field provides information about the Care Site where the Visit Detail took place.
+
+
+There should only be one Care Site associated with a Visit Detail.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the kind of visit detail that took place (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, etc.)
+
+
+If there is information about the kind of visit detail in the source data that value should be stored here. If a visit is an amalgamation of visits from the source then use a hierarchy to choose the VISIT_DETAIL_SOURCE_VALUE, such as IP -> ER-> OP. This should line up with the logic chosen to determine how visits are created.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the VISIT_DETAIL_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available, map to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was admitted from. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay, like inpatient visits or long-term care visits.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+admitted_from_source_value
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was admitted from. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was admitted to the hospital from a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the admitted_from_source_value to a standard concept in the visit domain. If not available, map to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+discharge_to_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating where a person was discharged to after a visit, as in they went home or were moved to long-term care. Typically this applies only to visits that have a length of stay of a day or more.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+discharge_to_concept_id
+
+
+Use this field to determine where the patient was discharged to after a visit detail record. This concept is part of the visit domain and can indicate if a patient was discharged to home or sent to a long-term care facility, for example.
+
+
+If available, map the DISCHARGE_TO_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Visit domain. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Visit
+
+
+
+
+preceding_visit_detail_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit detail that occurred for the person prior to the given visit detail record. There could be a few days or a few years in between.
+
+
+The PRECEDING_VISIT_DETAIL_ID can be used to link a visit immediately preceding the current Visit Detail. Note this is not symmetrical, and there is no such thing as a “following_visit_id”.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_parent_id
+
+
+Use this field to find the visit detail that subsumes the given visit detail record. This is used in the case that a visit detail record needs to be nested beyond the VISIT_OCCURRENCE/VISIT_DETAIL relationship.
+
+
+If there are multiple nested levels to how Visits are represented in the source, the VISIT_DETAIL_PARENT_ID can be used to record this relationship.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+Use this field to link the VISIT_DETAIL record to its VISIT_OCCURRENCE.
+
+
+Put the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID that subsumes the VISIT_DETAIL record here.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONDITION_OCCURRENCE
@@ -570,6 +2346,480 @@ div.tocify {
Conditions are defined by Concepts from the Condition domain, which form a complex hierarchy. As a result, the same Person with the same disease may have multiple Condition records, which belong to the same hierarchical family. Most Condition records are mapped from diagnostic codes, but recorded signs, symptoms and summary descriptions also contribute to this table. Rule out diagnoses should not be recorded in this table, but in reality their negating nature is not always captured in the source data, and other precautions must be taken when when identifying Persons who should suffer from the recorded Condition. Record all conditions as they exist in the source data. Any decisions about diagnosis/phenotype definitions would be done through cohort specifications. These cohorts can be housed in the COHORT table. Conditions span a time interval from start to end, but are typically recorded as single snapshot records with no end date. The reason is twofold: (i) At the time of the recording the duration is not known and later not recorded, and (ii) the Persons typically cease interacting with the healthcare system when they feel better, which leads to incomplete capture of resolved Conditions. The CONDITION_ERA table addresses this issue. Family history and past diagnoses (‘history of’) are not recorded in this table. Instead, they are listed in the OBSERVATION table. Codes written in the process of establishing the diagnosis, such as ‘question of’ of and ‘rule out’, should not represented here. Instead, they should be recorded in the OBSERVATION table, if they are used for analyses. However, this information is not always available.
ETL Conventions
Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Condition Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_occurrence_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a condition record for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate conditions during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a condition present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same condition within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, CONDITION_OCCURRENCE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the condition is recorded.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_concept_id
+
+
+The CONDITION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source value which represents a condition
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the CONDITION_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. Only records whose source values map to concepts with a domain of “Condition” should go in this table. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition
+
+
+
+
+condition_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the condition
+
+
+Most often data sources do not have the idea of a start date for a condition. Rather, if a source only has one date associated with a condition record it is acceptable to use that date for both the CONDITION_START_DATE and the CONDITION_END_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_end_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the end date of the condition
+
+
+Most often data sources do not have the idea of a start date for a condition. Rather, if a source only has one date associated with a condition record it is acceptable to use that date for both the CONDITION_START_DATE and the CONDITION_END_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Condition record, as in whether the condition was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the condition_type_concept_id that best represents the provenance of the record. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+condition_status_concept_id
+
+
+This concept represents the point during the visit the diagnosis was given (admitting diagnosis, final diagnosis), whether the diagnosis was determined due to laboratory findings, if the diagnosis was exclusionary, or if it was a preliminary diagnosis, among others.
+
+
+Choose the Concept in the Condition Status domain that best represents the point during the visit when the diagnosis was given. These can include admitting diagnosis, principal diagnosis, and secondary diagnosis. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason
+
+
+The Stop Reason indicates why a Condition is no longer valid with respect to the purpose within the source data. Note that a Stop Reason does not necessarily imply that the condition is no longer occurring.
+
+
+This information is often not populated in source data and it is a valid etl choice to leave it blank if the information does not exist.
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with condition record, e.g. the provider who made the diagnosis or the provider who recorded the symptom.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the condition occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a CONDITION_START_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the Visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the condition occurred. For example, if the person was in the ICU at the time of the diagnosis the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the condition that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the condition source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Condition necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using CONDITION_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the CONDITION_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_status_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the condition status.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating when and how a diagnosis was given to a patient. This source value is mapped to a standard concept which is stored in the CONDITION_STATUS_CONCEPT_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DRUG_EXPOSURE
@@ -579,6 +2829,664 @@ div.tocify {
The purpose of records in this table is to indicate an exposure to a certain drug as best as possible. In this context a drug is defined as an active ingredient. Drug Exposures are defined by Concepts from the Drug domain, which form a complex hierarchy. As a result, one DRUG_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID may map to multiple standard concept ids if it is a combination product. Records in this table represent prescriptions written, prescriptions dispensed, and drugs administered by a provider to name a few. The DRUG_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID can be used to find and filter on these types. This table includes additional information about the drug products, the quantity given, and route of administration.
ETL Conventions
Information about quantity and dose is provided in a variety of different ways and it is important for the ETL to provide as much information as possible from the data. Depending on the provenance of the data fields may be captured differently i.e. quantity for drugs administered may have a separate meaning from quantity for prescriptions dispensed. If a patient has multiple records on the same day for the same drug or procedures the ETL should not de-dupe them unless there is probable reason to believe the item is a true data duplicate. Take note on how to handle refills for prescriptions written.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_id
+
+
+The unique key given to records of drug dispensings or administrations for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate drugs during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a drug dispensing or administration present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same drug within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, DRUG_EXPOSURE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the drug dispensing or administration is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The DRUG_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a drug product or molecule otherwise introduced to the body. The drug concepts can have a varying degree of information about drug strength and dose. This information is relevant in the context of quantity and administration information in the subsequent fields plus strength information from the DRUG_STRENGTH table, provided as part of the standard vocabulary download.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. The concept id should be derived either from mapping from the source concept id or by picking the drug concept representing the most amount of detail you have. Records whose source values map to standard concepts with a domain of Drug should go in this table. When the Drug Source Value of the code cannot be translated into Standard Drug Concept IDs, a Drug exposure entry is stored with only the corresponding SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID and DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE and a DRUG_CONCEPT_ID of 0. The Drug Concept with the most detailed content of information is preferred during the mapping process. These are indicated in the CONCEPT_CLASS_ID field of the Concept and are recorded in the following order of precedence: ‘Branded Pack’, ‘Clinical Pack’, ‘Branded Drug’, ‘Clinical Drug’, ‘Branded Drug Component’, ‘Clinical Drug Component’, ‘Branded Drug Form’, ‘Clinical Drug Form’, and only if no other information is available ‘Ingredient’. Note: If only the drug class is known, the DRUG_CONCEPT_ID field should contain 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the drug record.
+
+
+Valid entries include a start date of a prescription, the date a prescription was filled, or the date on which a Drug administration was recorded. It is a valid ETL choice to use the date the drug was ordered as the DRUG_EXPOSURE_START_DATE.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_end_date
+
+
+The DRUG_EXPOSURE_END_DATE denotes the day the drug exposure ended for the patient.
+
+
+If this information is not explicitly available in the data, infer the end date using the following methods:/n/n 1. Start first with duration or days supply using the calculation drug start date + days supply -1 day. 2. Use quantity divided by daily dose that you may obtain from the sig or a source field (or assumed daily dose of 1) for solid, indivisibile, drug products. If quantity represents ingredient amount, quantity divided by daily dose * concentration (from drug_strength) drug concept id tells you the dose form. 3. If it is an administration record, set drug end date equal to drug start date. If the record is a written prescription then set end date to start date + 29. If the record is a mail-order prescription set end date to start date + 89. The end date must be equal to or greater than the start date. Ibuprofen 20mg/mL oral solution concept tells us this is oral solution. Calculate duration as quantity (200 example) * daily dose (5mL) /concentration (20mg/mL) 200*5/20 = 50 days. Examples by dose form
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+verbatim_end_date
+
+
+This is the end date of the drug exposure as it appears in the source data, if it is given
+
+
+Put the end date or discontinuation date as it appears from the source data or leave blank if unavailable.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_type_concept_id
+
+
+You can use the TYPE_CONCEPT_ID to delineate between prescriptions written vs. prescriptions dispensed vs. medication history vs. patient-reported exposure, etc.
+
+
+Choose the drug_type_concept_id that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from a record of a prescription written or physician administered drug. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason
+
+
+The reason a person stopped a medication as it is represented in the source. Reasons include regimen completed, changed, removed, etc. This field will be retired in v6.0.
+
+
+This information is often not populated in source data and it is a valid etl choice to leave it blank if the information does not exist.
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+refills
+
+
+This is only filled in when the record is coming from a prescription written this field is meant to represent intended refills at time of the prescription.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+
+
+To find the dose form of a drug the RELATIONSHIP table can be used where the relationship_id is ‘Has dose form’. If liquid, quantity stands for the total amount dispensed or ordered of ingredient in the units given by the drug_strength table. If the unit from the source data does not align with the unit in the DRUG_STRENGTH table the quantity should be converted to the correct unit given in DRUG_STRENGTH. For clinical drugs with fixed dose forms (tablets etc.) the quantity is the number of units/tablets/capsules prescribed or dispensed (can be partial, but then only 1/2 or 1/3, not 0.01). Clinical drugs with divisible dose forms (injections) the quantity is the amount of ingredient the patient got. For example, if the injection is 2mg/mL but the patient got 80mL then quantity is reported as 160. Quantified clinical drugs with divisible dose forms (prefilled syringes), the quantity is the amount of ingredient similar to clinical drugs. Please see how to calculate drug dose for more information.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+days_supply
+
+
+
+
+Days supply of the drug. This should be the verbatim days_supply as given on the prescription. If the drug is physician administered use duration end date if given or set to 1 as default if duration is not available.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sig
+
+
+This is the verbatim instruction for the drug as written by the provider.
+
+
+Put the written out instructions for the drug as it is verbatim in the source, if available.
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+route_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The standard CONCEPT_ID that the ROUTE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to in the route domain.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Route
+
+
+
+
+lot_number
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider associated with drug record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who administered the drug.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the ordering vs administering physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the drug was prescribed, administered or dispensed.
+
+
+To populate this field drug exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the drug exposure occurred. For example, if the person was in the ICU at the time of the drug administration the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the drug exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Drug Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the drug source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Drug necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DRUG_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the DRUG_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If unavailable, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+route_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the drug route.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating when and how a drug was given to a patient. This source value is mapped to a standard concept which is stored in the ROUTE_CONCEPT_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the dose unit of the drug given.
+
+
+This information may be called something different in the source data but the field is meant to contain a value indicating the unit of dosage of drug given to the patient. This is an older column and will be deprecated in an upcoming version.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE
@@ -588,6 +3496,426 @@ div.tocify {
Lab tests are not a procedure, if something is observed with an expected resulting amount and unit then it should be a measurement. Phlebotomy is a procedure but so trivial that it tends to be rarely captured. It can be assumed that there is a phlebotomy procedure associated with many lab tests, therefore it is unnecessary to add them as separate procedures. If the user finds the same procedure over concurrent days, it is assumed those records are part of a procedure lasting more than a day. This logic is in lieu of the procedure_end_date, which will be added in a future version of the CDM.
ETL Conventions
If a procedure lasts more than a day, then it should be recorded as a separate record for each day the procedure occurred, this logic is in lieu of the PROCEDURE_END_DATE, which will be added in a future version of the CDM. When dealing with duplicate records, the ETL must determine whether to sum them up into one record or keep them separate. Things to consider are: - Same Procedure - Same PROCEDURE_DATETIME - Same Visit Occurrence or Visit Detail - Same Provider - Same Modifier for Procedures. Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Procedure Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_occurrence_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a procedure record for a person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate procedures during the same visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a procedure occurrence in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same procedure within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the procedure is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_concept_id
+
+
+The PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source value which represents a procedure
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to. Only records whose source values map to standard concepts with a domain of “Procedure” should go in this table. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Procedure
+
+
+
+
+procedure_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the date the procedure occurred.
+
+
+If a procedure lasts more than a day, then it should be recorded as a separate record for each day the procedure occurred, this logic is in lieu of the procedure_end_date, which will be added in a future version of the CDM.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Procedure record, as in whether the procedure was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the PROCEDURE_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. If a procedure is recorded as an EHR encounter, the PROCEDURE_TYPE_CONCEPT would be ‘EHR encounter record’. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+modifier_concept_id
+
+
+The modifiers are intended to give additional information about the procedure but as of now the vocabulary is under review.
+
+
+It is up to the ETL to choose how to map modifiers if they exist in source data. These concepts are typically distinguished by ‘Modifier’ concept classes (e.g., ‘CPT4 Modifier’ as part of the ‘CPT4’ vocabulary). If there is more than one modifier on a record, one should be chosen that pertains to the procedure rather than provider. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+If the quantity value is omitted, a single procedure is assumed.
+
+
+If a Procedure has a quantity of ‘0’ in the source, this should default to ‘1’ in the ETL. If there is a record in the source it can be assumed the exposure occurred at least once
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with the procedure record, e.g. the provider who performed the Procedure.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record, for example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the procedure occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a PROCEDURE_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the Visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the PROCEDURE_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Procedure occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time of the Procedure the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the procedure that occurred. For example, this could be an CPT4 or OPCS4 code.
+
+
+Use this value to look up the source concept id and then map the source concept id to a standard concept id.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+procedure_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the procedure source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Procedure necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using PROCEDURE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the PROCEDURE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+modifier_source_value
+
+
+
+
+The original modifier code from the source is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DEVICE_EXPOSURE
@@ -597,6 +3925,449 @@ div.tocify {
The distinction between Devices or supplies and Procedures are sometimes blurry, but the former are physical objects while the latter are actions, often to apply a Device or supply.
ETL Conventions
Source codes and source text fields mapped to Standard Concepts of the Device Domain have to be recorded here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_id
+
+
+The unique key given to records a person’s exposure to a foreign physical object or instrument.
+
+
+Each instance of an exposure to a foreign object or device present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_concept_id
+
+
+The DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies. This is the standard concept mapped from the source concept id which represents a foreign object or instrument the person was exposed to.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE maps to.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Device
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_start_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the start date of the device record.
+
+
+Valid entries include a start date of a procedure to implant a device, the date of a prescription for a device, or the date of device administration.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_end_date
+
+
+The DEVICE_EXPOSURE_END_DATE denotes the day the device exposure ended for the patient, if given.
+
+
+Put the end date or discontinuation date as it appears from the source data or leave blank if unavailable.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_exposure_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_type_concept_id
+
+
+You can use the TYPE_CONCEPT_ID to denote the provenance of the record, as in whether the record is from administrative claims or EHR. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+Choose the drug_type_concept_id that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from a record of a prescription written or physician administered drug.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+unique_device_id
+
+
+This is the Unique Device Identification number for devices regulated by the FDA, if given.
+
+
+For medical devices that are regulated by the FDA, a Unique Device Identification (UDI) is provided if available in the data source and is recorded in the UNIQUE_DEVICE_ID field.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider associated with device record, e.g. the provider who wrote the prescription or the provider who implanted the device.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the device was prescribed or given.
+
+
+To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The Visit Detail during which the device was prescribed or given.
+
+
+To populate this field device exposures must be explicitly initiated in the visit detail record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the device exposure that occurred. For example, this could be an NDC or Gemscript code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Device Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+device_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the device source value and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Device necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using DEVICE_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the DEVICE_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If unavailable, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
MEASUREMENT
@@ -606,6 +4377,591 @@ div.tocify {
Measurements are predominately lab tests with a few exceptions, like blood pressure or function tests. Results are given in the form of a value and unit combination. When investigating measurements, look for operator_concept_ids (<, >, etc.).
ETL Conventions
Only records where the source value maps to a Concept in the measurement domain should be included in this table. Even though each Measurement always has a result, the fields VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are not mandatory as often the result is not given in the source data. When the result is not known, the Measurement record represents just the fact that the corresponding Measurement was carried out, which in itself is already useful information for some use cases. For some Measurement Concepts, the result is included in the test. For example, ICD10 CONCEPT_ID 45548980 ‘Abnormal level of unspecified serum enzyme’ indicates a Measurement and the result (abnormal). In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the ‘Maps to’ record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to ‘Maps to value’. In this example, the ‘Maps to’ relationship directs to 4046263 ‘Enzyme measurement’ as well as a ‘Maps to value’ record to 4135493 ‘Abnormal’.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a Measurement record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Measurements during the same Visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of a measurement present in the source data should be assigned this unique key. In some cases, a person can have multiple records of the same measurement within the same visit. It is valid to keep these duplicates and assign them individual, unique, MEASUREMENT_IDs, though it is up to the ETL how they should be handled.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the PERSON for whom the measurement is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_concept_id
+
+
+The MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. Only records whose SOURCE_CONCEPT_IDs map to Standard Concepts with a domain of “Measurement” should go in this table.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Measurement
+
+
+
+
+measurement_date
+
+
+Use this date to determine the date of the measurement.
+
+
+If there are multiple dates in the source data associated with a record such as order_date, draw_date, and result_date, choose the one that is closest to the date the sample was drawn from the patient.
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_datetime
+
+
+
+
+This is not required, though it is in v6. If a source does not specify datetime the convention is to set the time to midnight (00:00:0000)
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_time
+
+
+
+
+This is present for backwards compatibility and will be deprecated in an upcoming version.
+
+
+varchar(10)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Measurement record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the MEASUREMENT_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+operator_concept_id
+
+
+The meaning of Concept 4172703 for ‘=’ is identical to omission of a OPERATOR_CONCEPT_ID value. Since the use of this field is rare, it’s important when devising analyses to not to forget testing for the content of this field for values different from =.
+
+
+Operators are <, <=, =, >=, > and these concepts belong to the ‘Meas Value Operator’ domain. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_number
+
+
+This is the numerical value of the Result of the Measurement, if available. Note that measurements such as blood pressures will be split into their component parts i.e. one record for systolic, one record for diastolic.
+
+
+If there is a negative value coming from the source, set the VALUE_AS_NUMBER to NULL, with the exception of the following Measurements (listed as LOINC codes):<br>- 1925-7 Base excess in Arterial blood by calculation - 1927-3 Base excess in Venous blood by calculation - 8632-2 QRS-Axis - 11555-0 Base excess in Blood by calculation - 1926-5 Base excess in Capillary blood by calculation - 28638-5 Base excess in Arterial cord blood by calculation 28639-3 Base excess in Venous cord blood by calculation
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+If the raw data gives a categorial result for measurements those values are captured and mapped to standard concepts in the ‘Meas Value’ domain.
+
+
+If the raw data provides categorial results as well as continuous results for measurements, it is a valid ETL choice to preserve both values. The continuous value should go in the VALUE_AS_NUMBER field and the categorical value should be mapped to a standard concept in the ‘Meas Value’ domain and put in the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field. This is also the destination for the ‘Maps to value’ relationship.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+There is currently no recommended unit for individual measurements, i.e. it is not mandatory to represent Hemoglobin a1C measurements as a percentage. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data.
+
+
+There is no standardization requirement for units associated with MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+range_low
+
+
+Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.
+
+
+If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+range_high
+
+
+Ranges have the same unit as the VALUE_AS_NUMBER. These ranges are provided by the source and should remain NULL if not given.
+
+
+If reference ranges for upper and lower limit of normal as provided (typically by a laboratory) these are stored in the RANGE_HIGH and RANGE_LOW fields. This should be set to NULL if not provided.
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with measurement record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the Measurement occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If a MEASUREMENT_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the measurement record. If a measurement is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Measurement falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Measurement occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Measurement that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Measurement Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+measurement_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Measurement necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using MEASUREMENT_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the MEASUREMENT_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the unit of the Measurement that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim result value of the Measurement from the source data .
+
+
+If both a continuous and categorical result are given in the source data such that both VALUE_AS_NUMBER and VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID are both included, store the verbatim value that was mapped to VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID here.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
OBSERVATION
@@ -615,6 +4971,616 @@ div.tocify {
Observations differ from Measurements in that they do not require a standardized test or some other activity to generate clinical fact. Typical observations are medical history, family history, the stated need for certain treatment, social circumstances, lifestyle choices, healthcare utilization patterns, etc. If the generation clinical facts requires a standardized testing such as lab testing or imaging and leads to a standardized result, the data item is recorded in the MEASUREMENT table. If the clinical fact observed determines a sign, symptom, diagnosis of a disease or other medical condition, it is recorded in the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table. Valid Observation Concepts are not enforced to be from any domain though they still should be Standard Concepts.
ETL Conventions
Records whose Source Values map to any domain besides Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement or Device should be stored in the Observation table. Observations can be stored as attribute value pairs, with the attribute as the Observation Concept and the value representing the clinical fact. This fact can be a Concept (stored in VALUE_AS_CONCEPT), a numerical value (VALUE_AS_NUMBER), a verbatim string (VALUE_AS_STRING), or a datetime (VALUE_AS_DATETIME). Even though Observations do not have an explicit result, the clinical fact can be stated separately from the type of Observation in the VALUE_AS_* fields. It is recommended for Observations that are suggestive statements of positive assertion should have a value of ‘Yes’ (concept_id=4188539), recorded, even though the null value is the equivalent.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_id
+
+
+The unique key given to an Observation record for a Person. Refer to the ETL for how duplicate Observations during the same Visit were handled.
+
+
+Each instance of an observation present in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The PERSON_ID of the Person for whom the Observation is recorded. This may be a system generated code.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_concept_id
+
+
+The OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID field is recommended for primary use in analyses, and must be used for network studies.
+
+
+The CONCEPT_ID that the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_CONCEPT_ID maps to. There is no specified domain that the Concepts in this table must adhere to. The only rule is that records with Concepts in the Condition, Procedure, Drug, Measurement, or Device domains MUST go to the corresponding table.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_date
+
+
+The date of the Observation. Depending on what the Observation represents this could be the date of a lab test, the date of a survey, or the date a patient’s family history was taken.
+
+
+For some observations the ETL may need to make a choice as to which date to choose.
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time is given set to midnight (00:00:00).
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_type_concept_id
+
+
+This field can be used to determine the provenance of the Observation record, as in whether the measurement was from an EHR system, insurance claim, registry, or other sources.
+
+
+Choose the OBSERVATION_TYPE_CONCEPT_ID that best represents the provenance of the record, for example whether it came from an EHR record or billing claim. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+value_as_number
+
+
+This is the numerical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available. It is not expected that all Observations will have numeric results, rather, this field is here to house values should they exist.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_string
+
+
+This is the categorical value of the Result of the Observation, if applicable and available.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(60)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+It is possible that some records destined for the Observation table have two clinical ideas represented in one source code. This is common with ICD10 codes that describe a family history of some Condition, for example. In OMOP the Vocabulary breaks these two clinical ideas into two codes; one becomes the OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID and the other becomes the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID. It is important when using the Observation table to keep this possibility in mind and to examine the VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID field for relevant information.
+
+
+Note that the value of VALUE_AS_CONCEPT_ID may be provided through mapping from a source Concept which contains the content of the Observation. In those situations, the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table in addition to the ‘Maps to’ record contains a second record with the relationship_id set to ‘Maps to value’. For example, ICD10 Z82.4 ‘Family history of ischaemic heart disease and other diseases of the circulatory system’ has a ‘Maps to’ relationship to 4167217 ‘Family history of clinical finding’ as well as a ‘Maps to value’ record to 134057 ‘Disorder of cardiovascular system’.
+
+
+Integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+qualifier_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains all attributes specifying the clinical fact further, such as as degrees, severities, drug-drug interaction alerts etc.
+
+
+Use your best judgement as to what Concepts to use here and if they are necessary to accurately represent the clinical record. There is no restriction on the domain of these Concepts, they just need to be Standard.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+There is currently no recommended unit for individual observation concepts. UNIT_SOURCE_VALUES should be mapped to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain that best represents the unit as given in the source data.
+
+
+There is no standardization requirement for units associated with OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_IDs, however, it is the responsibility of the ETL to choose the most plausible unit.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The provider associated with the observation record, e.g. the provider who ordered the test or the provider who recorded the result.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which PROVIDER_ID to put here. Based on what is available this may or may not be different than the provider associated with the overall VISIT_OCCURRENCE record. For example the admitting vs attending physician on an EHR record.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The visit during which the Observation occurred.
+
+
+Depending on the structure of the source data, this may have to be determined based on dates. If an OBSERVATION_DATE occurs within the start and end date of a Visit it is a valid ETL choice to choose the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID from the visit that subsumes it, even if not explicitly stated in the data. While not required, an attempt should be made to locate the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID of the observation record. If an observation is related to a visit explicitly in the source data, it is possible that the result date of the Observation falls outside of the bounds of the Visit dates.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The VISIT_DETAIL record during which the Observation occurred. For example, if the Person was in the ICU at the time the VISIT_OCCURRENCE record would reflect the overall hospital stay and the VISIT_DETAIL record would reflect the ICU stay during the hospital visit.
+
+
+Same rules apply as for the VISIT_OCCURRENCE_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the Observation that occurred. For example, this could be an ICD10 or Read code.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is the concept representing the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE and may not necessarily be standard. This field is discouraged from use in analysis because it is not required to contain Standard Concepts that are used across the OHDSI community, and should only be used when Standard Concepts do not adequately represent the source detail for the Observation necessary for a given analytic use case. Consider using OBSERVATION_CONCEPT_ID instead to enable standardized analytics that can be consistent across the network.
+
+
+If the OBSERVATION_SOURCE_VALUE is coded in the source data using an OMOP supported vocabulary put the concept id representing the source value here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the unit of the Observation that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+qualifier_source_value
+
+
+This field houses the verbatim value from the source data representing the qualifier of the Observation that occurred.
+
+
+This code is mapped to a Standard Condition Concept in the Standardized Vocabularies and the original code is stored here for reference.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+observation_event_id
+
+
+If the Observation record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record.
+
+If the Observation record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the OBSERVATION_EVENT_ID came from.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_datetime
+
+
+It is possible that some Observation records might store a result as a date value.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NOTE
@@ -630,11 +5596,874 @@ div.tocify {
Role: Characterizes the training or professional level of the author of the document, but does not break down to specialty or subspecialty (e.g. Physician) Each combination of these 5 dimensions rolls up to a unique LOINC code.
According to CDO requirements, only 2 of the 5 dimensions are required to properly annotate a document; Kind of Document and any one of the other 4 dimensions. However, not all the permutations of the CDO dimensions will necessarily yield an existing LOINC code. Each of these dimensions are contained in the OMOP Vocabulary under the domain of ‘Meas Value’ with each dimension represented as a Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each note.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_event_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_event_field_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_date
+
+
+The date the note was recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If time is not given set the time to midnight.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_type_concept_id
+
+
+The provenance of the note. Most likely this will be EHR.
+
+
+Put the source system of the note, as in EHR record. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+note_class_concept_id
+
+
+A Standard Concept Id representing the HL7 LOINC Document Type Vocabulary classification of the note.
+
+
+Map the note classification to a Standard Concept. For more information see the ETL Conventions in the description of the NOTE table. AcceptedConcepts. This Concept can alternatively be represented by concepts with the relationship ‘Kind of (LOINC)’ to 706391 (Note).
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_title
+
+
+The title of the note.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_text
+
+
+The content of the note.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+encoding_concept_id
+
+
+This is the Concept representing the character encoding type.
+
+
+Put the Concept Id that represents the encoding character type here. Currently the only option is UTF-8 (32678). It the note is encoded in any other type, like ASCII then put 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+language_concept_id
+
+
+The language of the note.
+
+
+Use Concepts that are descendants of the concept 4182347 (World Languages).
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+The Provider who wrote the note.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a determination on which provider to put here.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the note was written.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_detail_id
+
+
+The Visit Detail during which the note was written.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_DETAIL
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_source_value
+
+
+
+
+The source value mapped to the NOTE_CLASS_CONCEPT_ID.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NOTE_NLP
Table Description
The NOTE_NLP table encodes all output of NLP on clinical notes. Each row represents a single extracted term from a note.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for the NLP record.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_id
+
+
+This is the NOTE_ID for the NOTE record the NLP record is associated to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+section_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The SECTION_CONCEPT_ID should be used to represent the note section contained in the NOTE_NLP record. These concepts can be found as parts of document panels and are based on the type of note written, i.e. a discharge summary. These panels can be found as concepts with the relationship ‘Subsumes’ to CONCEPT_ID 45875957.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+snippet
+
+
+A small window of text surrounding the term
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+"offset"
+
+
+Character offset of the extracted term in the input note
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+lexical_variant
+
+
+Raw text extracted from the NLP tool.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+note_nlp_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_system
+
+
+
+
+Name and version of the NLP system that extracted the term. Useful for data provenance.
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_date
+
+
+The date of the note processing.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+nlp_datetime
+
+
+The date and time of the note processing.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_exists
+
+
+
+
+Term_exists is defined as a flag that indicates if the patient actually has or had the condition. Any of the following modifiers would make Term_exists false: Negation = true Subject = [anything other than the patient] Conditional = true/li> Rule_out = true Uncertain = very low certainty or any lower certainties A complete lack of modifiers would make Term_exists true.
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_temporal
+
+
+
+
+Term_temporal is to indicate if a condition is present or just in the past. The following would be past:<br><br> - History = true - Concept_date = anything before the time of the report
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+term_modifiers
+
+
+
+
+For the modifiers that are there, they would have to have these values:<br><br> - Negation = false - Subject = patient - Conditional = false - Rule_out = false - Uncertain = true or high or moderate or even low (could argue about low). Term_modifiers will concatenate all modifiers for different types of entities (conditions, drugs, labs etc) into one string. Lab values will be saved as one of the modifiers.
+
+
+varchar(2000)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SPECIMEN
@@ -642,6 +6471,436 @@ div.tocify {
The specimen domain contains the records identifying biological samples from a person.
ETL Conventions
Anatomic site is coded at the most specific level of granularity possible, such that higher level classifications can be derived using the Standardized Vocabularies.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_id
+
+
+Unique identifier for each specimen.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The person from whom the specimen is collected.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+The standard CONCEPT_ID that the SPECIMEN_SOURCE_VALUE maps to in the specimen domain. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+Put the source of the specimen record, as in an EHR system. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+specimen_date
+
+
+The date the specimen was collected.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_datetime
+
+
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+quantity
+
+
+The amount of specimen collected from the person.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+The unit for the quantity of the specimen.
+
+
+Map the UNIT_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Unit domain. Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+anatomic_site_concept_id
+
+
+This is the site on the body where the specimen is from.
+
+
+Map the ANATOMIC_SITE_SOURCE_VALUE to a Standard Concept in the Spec Anatomic Site domain. This should be coded at the lowest level of granularity Accepted Concepts
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+disease_status_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_source_id
+
+
+This is the identifier for the specimen from the source system.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specimen_source_value
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+unit_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This unit for the quantity of the specimen, as represented in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+anatomic_site_source_value
+
+
+
+
+This is the site on the body where the specimen was taken from, as represented in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+disease_status_source_value
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
FACT_RELATIONSHIP
@@ -649,6 +6908,169 @@ div.tocify {
The FACT_RELATIONSHIP table contains records about the relationships between facts stored as records in any table of the CDM. Relationships can be defined between facts from the same domain, or different domains. Examples of Fact Relationships include: Person relationships (parent-child), care site relationships (hierarchical organizational structure of facilities within a health system), indication relationship (between drug exposures and associated conditions), usage relationships (of devices during the course of an associated procedure), or facts derived from one another (measurements derived from an associated specimen).
ETL Conventions
All relationships are directional, and each relationship is represented twice symmetrically within the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table. For example, two persons if person_id = 1 is the mother of person_id = 2 two records are in the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table (all strings in fact concept_id records in the Concept table: - Person, 1, Person, 2, parent of - Person, 2, Person, 1, child of
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+fact_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+fact_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
SURVEY_CONDUCT
@@ -658,6 +7080,682 @@ div.tocify {
This table captures details of the individual questionnaire such as who completed it, when it was completed and to which patient treatment or visit it relates to (if any).
ETL Conventions
Each SURVEY has a SURVEY_CONCEPT_ID, a concept in the CONCEPT table identifying the questionnaire e.g. EQ5D, VR12, SF12. Each questionnaire should exist in the CONCEPT table. Each SURVEY can be optionally related to a specific Visit in order to link it both to the Visit during which it was completed and any subsequent Visit where treatment was assigned based on the patient’s responses.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_conduct_id
+
+
+Unique identifier for each completed survey.
+
+
+For each instance of a survey completion create a unique identifier.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_concept_id
+
+
+This is the Concept that represents the survey that was completed.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies the survey that the Person completed. There is no specified domain for this table but the concept class ‘staging/scales’ contains many common surveys. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_start_date
+
+
+Date on which the survey was started.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time given, set to midnight.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_end_date
+
+
+Date on which the survey was completed.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+If no time given, set to midnight.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+This is the Provider associated with the survey completion.
+
+
+The ETL may need to make a choice as to which Provider to put here. This could either be the provider that ordered the survey or the provider who observed the completion of the survey.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PROVIDER
+
+
+
+
+
+
+assisted_concept_id
+
+
+This is a Concept that represents whether the survey was completed with assistance or independently.
+
+
+There is no specific domain or class for this field, just choose the one that best represents the value given in the source.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+respondent_type_concept_id
+
+
+This is a Concept that represents who actually recorded the answers to the survey. For example, this could be the patient or a research associate.
+
+
+There is no specific domain or class for this field, just choose the one that best represents the value given in the source.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+timing_concept_id
+
+
+This is a Concept that represents the timing of the survey. For example this could be the 3-month follow-up appointment.
+
+
+There is no specific domain or class for this field, just choose the one that best represents the value given in the source.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+collection_method_concept_id
+
+
+This Concept represents how the responses were collected.
+
+
+Use the concepts that have the relationship ‘Has Answer’ with the CONCEPT_ID 42529316.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+assisted_source_value
+
+
+Source value representing whether patient required assistance to complete the survey. Example: ‘Completed without assistance’, ‘Completed with assistance’.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+respondent_type_source_value
+
+
+Source code representing role of person who completed the survey.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(100)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+timing_source_value
+
+
+Text string representing the timing of the survey. Example: Baseline, 6-month follow-up.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(100)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+collection_method_source_value
+
+
+The collection method as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(100)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_source_value
+
+
+The survey name as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(100)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If unavailable, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_source_identifier
+
+
+Unique identifier for each completed survey in source system.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(100)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+validated_survey_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If unavailable, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+validated_survey_source_value
+
+
+Source value representing the validation status of the survey.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+survey_version_number
+
+
+Version number of the questionnaire or survey used.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which the Survey occurred.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+response_visit_occurrence_id
+
+
+The Visit during which any treatment related to the Survey was carried out.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VISIT_OCCURRENCE
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -668,11 +7766,498 @@ div.tocify {
The LOCATION table represents a generic way to capture physical location or address information of Persons and Care Sites. New to CDM v6.0 The LOCATION table now includes latitude and longitude.
ETL Conventions
Each address or Location is unique and is present only once in the table. Locations do not contain names, such as the name of a hospital. In order to construct a full address that can be used in the postal service, the address information from the Location needs to be combined with information from the Care Site. For standardized geospatial visualization and analysis, addresses need to be, at the minimum be geocoded into latitude and longitude.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_id
+
+
+The unique key given to a unique Location.
+
+
+Each instance of a Location in the source data should be assigned this unique key.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+address_1
+
+
+This is the first line of the address.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+address_2
+
+
+This is the second line of the address
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+city
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+state
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(2)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+zip
+
+
+
+
+Zip codes are handled as strings of up to 9 characters length. For US addresses, these represent either a 3-digit abbreviated Zip code as provided by many sources for patient protection reasons, the full 5-digit Zip or the 9-digit (ZIP + 4) codes. Unless for specific reasons analytical methods should expect and utilize only the first 3 digits. For international addresses, different rules apply.
+
+
+varchar(9)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+county
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_source_value
+
+
+
+
+Put the verbatim value for the location here, as it shows up in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+latitude
+
+
+The geocoded latitude.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+longitude
+
+
+The geocoded longitude.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
LOCATION_HISTORY
Table Description
The LOCATION HISTORY table stores relationships between Persons or Care Sites and geographic locations over time. This table is new to CDM v6.0
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_id
+
+
+This is the LOCATION_ID for the LOCATION_HISTORY record.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+LOCATION
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_type_concept_id
+
+
+This is the relationship between the location and the entity (PERSON, PROVIDER, or CARE_SITE)
+
+
+Concepts in this field must be in the Location class. Accepted Concepts. If the DOMAIN_ID is CARE_SITE this should be 0 and when the domain is PROVIDER the value is Office.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+
+
+The domain of the entity that is related to the location. Either PERSON, PROVIDER, or CARE_SITE.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+entity_id
+
+
+
+
+The unique identifier for the entity. References either person_id, provider_id, or care_site_id, depending on domain_id.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+start_date
+
+
+The date the relationship started
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+end_date
+
+
+The date the relationship ended
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CARE_SITE
@@ -680,6 +8265,200 @@ div.tocify {
The CARE_SITE table contains a list of uniquely identified institutional (physical or organizational) units where healthcare delivery is practiced (offices, wards, hospitals, clinics, etc.).
ETL Conventions
Care site is a unique combination of location_id and place_of_service_source_value. Care site does not take into account the provider (human) information such a specialty. Many source data do not make a distinction between individual and institutional providers. The CARE_SITE table contains the institutional providers. If the source, instead of uniquely identifying individual Care Sites, only provides limited information such as Place of Service, generic or “pooled” Care Site records are listed in the CARE_SITE table. There can be hierarchical and business relationships between Care Sites. For example, wards can belong to clinics or departments, which can in turn belong to hospitals, which in turn can belong to hospital systems, which in turn can belong to HMOs.The relationships between Care Sites are defined in the FACT_RELATIONSHIP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+
+
+Assign an id to each unique combination of location_id and place_of_service_source_value.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_name
+
+
+The name of the care_site as it appears in the source data
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+place_of_service_concept_id
+
+
+This is a high-level way of characterizing a Care Site. Typically, however, Care Sites can provide care in multiple settings (inpatient, outpatient, etc.) and this granularity should be reflected in the visit.
+
+
+Choose the concept in the visit domain that best represents the setting in which healthcare is provided in the Care Site. If most visits in a Care Site are Inpatient, then the place_of_service_concept_id should represent Inpatient. If information is present about a unique Care Site (e.g. Pharmacy) then a Care Site record should be created. If this information is not available then set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+location_id
+
+
+The location_id from the LOCATION table representing the physical location of the care_site.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+LOCATION
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_source_value
+
+
+The identifier of the care_site as it appears in the source data. This could be an identifier separate from the name of the care_site.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+place_of_service_source_value
+
+
+
+
+Put the place of service of the care_site as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
PROVIDER
@@ -687,6 +8466,393 @@ div.tocify {
The PROVIDER table contains a list of uniquely identified healthcare providers. These are individuals providing hands-on healthcare to patients, such as physicians, nurses, midwives, physical therapists etc.
User Guide
Many sources do not make a distinction between individual and institutional providers. The PROVIDER table contains the individual providers. If the source, instead of uniquely identifying individual providers, only provides limited information such as specialty, generic or ‘pooled’ Provider records are listed in the PROVIDER table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_id
+
+
+It is assumed that every provider with a different unique identifier is in fact a different person and should be treated independently.
+
+
+This identifier can be the original id from the source data provided it is an integer, otherwise it can be an autogenerated number.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+provider_name
+
+
+
+
+This field is not necessary as it is not necessary to have the actual identity of the Provider. Rather, the idea is to uniquely and anonymously identify providers of care across the database.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+npi
+
+
+This is the National Provider Number issued to health care providers in the US by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dea
+
+
+This is the identifier issued by the DEA, a US federal agency, that allows a provider to write prescriptions for controlled substances.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_concept_id
+
+
+This field either represents the most common specialty that occurs in the data or the most specific concept that represents all specialties listed, should the provider have more than one. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists.
+
+
+If a Provider has more than one Specialty, there are two options: 1. Choose a concept_id which is a common ancestor to the multiple specialties, or, 2. Choose the specialty that occurs most often for the provider. Concepts in this field should be Standard with a domain of Provider. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+care_site_id
+
+
+This is the CARE_SITE_ID for the location that the provider primarily practices in.
+
+
+If a Provider has more than one Care Site, the main or most often exerted CARE_SITE_ID should be recorded.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CARE_SITE
+
+
+
+
+
+
+year_of_birth
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the recorded gender of the provider in the source data.
+
+
+If given, put a concept from the gender domain representing the recorded gender of the provider. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Gender
+
+
+
+
+provider_source_value
+
+
+Use this field to link back to providers in the source data. This is typically used for error checking of ETL logic.
+
+
+Some use cases require the ability to link back to providers in the source data. This field allows for the storing of the provider identifier as it appears in the source.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_source_value
+
+
+This is the kind of provider or specialty as it appears in the source data. This includes physician specialties such as internal medicine, emergency medicine, etc. and allied health professionals such as nurses, midwives, and pharmacists.
+
+
+Put the kind of provider as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+specialty_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is often zero as many sites use proprietary codes to store physician speciality.
+
+
+If the source data codes provider specialty in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_source_value
+
+
+This is provider’s gender as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+Put the provider’s gender as it appears in the source data. This field is up to the discretion of the ETL-er as to whether this should be the coded value from the source or the text description of the lookup value.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gender_source_concept_id
+
+
+This is often zero as many sites use proprietary codes to store provider gender.
+
+
+If the source data codes provider gender in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -697,6 +8863,606 @@ div.tocify {
The PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD table captures details of the period of time that a Person is continuously enrolled under a specific health Plan benefit structure from a given Payer. Each Person receiving healthcare is typically covered by a health benefit plan, which pays for (fully or partially), or directly provides, the care. These benefit plans are provided by payers, such as health insurances or state or government agencies. In each plan the details of the health benefits are defined for the Person or her family, and the health benefit Plan might change over time typically with increasing utilization (reaching certain cost thresholds such as deductibles), plan availability and purchasing choices of the Person. The unique combinations of Payer organizations, health benefit Plans and time periods in which they are valid for a Person are recorded in this table.
User Guide
A Person can have multiple, overlapping, Payer_Plan_Periods in this table. For example, medical and drug coverage in the US can be represented by two Payer_Plan_Periods. The details of the benefit structure of the Plan is rarely known, the idea is just to identify that the Plans are different.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each unique combination of a Person, Payer, Plan, and Period of time.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+The Person covered by the Plan.
+
+
+A single Person can have multiple, overlapping, PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD records
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+contract_person_id
+
+
+The Person who is the primary subscriber/contract owner for Plan.
+
+
+This may or may not be the same as the PERSON_ID. For example, if a mother has her son on her plan and the PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD record is the for son, the sons’s PERSON_ID would go in PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD.PERSON_ID and the mother’s PERSON_ID would go in PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD.CONTRACT_PERSON_ID.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_start_date
+
+
+Start date of Plan coverage.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_end_date
+
+
+End date of Plan coverage.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the organization who reimburses the provider which administers care to the Person.
+
+
+Map the Payer directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same payer, though the name of the Payer is not necessary. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_source_value
+
+
+This is the Payer as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the Payer in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the specific health benefit Plan the Person is enrolled in.
+
+
+Map the Plan directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same health benefit Plan though the name of the Plan is not necessary. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_source_value
+
+
+This is the health benefit Plan of the Person as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+plan_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the Plan in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+contract_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the relationship between the PERSON_ID and CONTRACT_PERSON_ID. It should be read as PERSON_ID is the CONTRACT_CONCEPT_ID of the CONTRACT_PERSON_ID. So if CONTRACT_CONCEPT_ID represents the relationship ‘Stepdaughter’ then the Person for whom PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD record was recorded is the stepdaughter of the CONTRACT_PERSON_ID.
+
+
+If available, use this field to represent the relationship between the PERSON_ID and the CONTRACT_PERSON_ID. If the Person for whom the PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD record was recorded is the stepdaughter of the CONTRACT_PERSON_ID then CONTRACT_CONCEPT_ID would be 4330864. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+contract_source_value
+
+
+This is the relationship of the PERSON_ID to CONTRACT_PERSON_ID as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+contract_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the relationship between the PERSON_ID and CONTRACT_PERSON_ID in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here. If not available, set to 0.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the sponsor of the Plan who finances the Plan. This includes self-insured, small group health plan and large group health plan.
+
+
+Map the sponsor directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. The point is to stratify on this information and identify if Persons have the same sponsor though the name of the sponsor is not necessary. If not available, set to 0. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_source_value
+
+
+The Plan sponsor as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+sponsor_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the sponsor in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+family_source_value
+
+
+The common identifier for all people (often a family) that covered by the same policy.
+
+
+Often these are the common digits of the enrollment id of the policy members.
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_concept_id
+
+
+This field represents the reason the Person left the Plan, if known.
+
+
+Map the stop reason directly to a standard CONCEPT_ID. If one does not exists please contact the vocabulary team. There is no global controlled vocabulary available for this information. Accepted Concepts.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_source_value
+
+
+The Plan stop reason as it appears in the source data.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+stop_reason_source_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+If the source data codes the stop reason in an OMOP supported vocabulary store the concept_id here.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
COST
@@ -707,6 +9473,518 @@ div.tocify {
When dealing with summary costs, the cost of the goods or services the provider provides is often not known directly, but derived from the hospital charges multiplied by an average cost-to-charge ratio.
ETL Conventions
One cost record is generated for each response by a payer. In a claims databases, the payment and payment terms reported by the payer for the goods or services billed will generate one cost record. If the source data has payment information for more than one payer (i.e. primary insurance and secondary insurance payment for one entity), then a cost record is created for each reporting payer. Therefore, it is possible for one procedure to have multiple cost records for each payer, but typically it contains one or no record per entity. Payer reimbursement cost records will be identified by using the PAYER_PLAN_ID field. Drug costs are composed of ingredient cost (the amount charged by the wholesale distributor or manufacturer), the dispensing fee (the amount charged by the pharmacy and the sales tax).
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each COST record.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_event_id
+
+
+If the Cost record is related to another record in the database, this field is the primary key of the linked record.
+
+
+Put the primary key of the linked record, if applicable, here.
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_event_field_concept_id
+
+
+If the Cost record is related to another record in the database, this field is the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table the primary key of the linked record came from.
+
+
+Put the CONCEPT_ID that identifies which table and field the COST_EVENT_ID came from.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key that refers to a Standard Cost Concept identifier in the Standardized Vocabularies belonging to the ‘Cost’ vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_type_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key identifier to a concept in the CONCEPT table for the provenance or the source of the COST data and belonging to the ‘Type Concept’ vocabulary
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Type Concept
+
+
+
+
+cost_source_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key to a Cost Concept that refers to the code used in the source.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost_source_value
+
+
+The source value for the cost as it appears in the source data
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+currency_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key identifier to the concept representing the 3-letter code used to delineate international currencies, such as USD for US Dollar. These belong to the ‘Currency’ vocabulary
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cost
+
+
+The actual financial cost amount
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+incurred_date
+
+
+The first date of service of the clinical event corresponding to the cost as in table capturing the information (e.g. date of visit, date of procedure, date of condition, date of drug etc).
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+billed_date
+
+
+The date a bill was generated for a service or encounter
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+paid_date
+
+
+The date payment was received for a service or encounter
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+revenue_code_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key referring to a Standard Concept ID in the Standardized Vocabularies for Revenue codes belonging to the ‘Revenue Code’ vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drg_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key referring to a Standard Concept ID in the Standardized Vocabularies for DRG codes belonging to the ‘DRG’ vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+revenue_code_source_value
+
+
+The source value for the Revenue code as it appears in the source data, stored here for reference.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drg_source_value
+
+
+The source value for the 3-digit DRG source code as it appears in the source data, stored here for reference.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+payer_plan_period_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the PAYER_PLAN_PERIOD table, where the details of the Payer, Plan and Family are stored. Record the payer_plan_id that relates to the payer who contributed to the paid_by_payer field.
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -717,6 +9995,223 @@ div.tocify {
A Drug Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a particular active ingredient. A Drug Era is not the same as a Drug Exposure: Exposures are individual records corresponding to the source when Drug was delivered to the Person, while successive periods of Drug Exposures are combined under certain rules to produce continuous Drug Eras.
ETL Conventions
The SQL script for generating DRUG_ERA records can be found here.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_start_datetime
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era Start Date is the start date of the first Drug Exposure for a given ingredient, with at least 31 days since the previous exposure.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_era_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+The Drug Era End Date is the end date of the last Drug Exposure. The End Date of each Drug Exposure is either taken from the field drug_exposure_end_date or, as it is typically not available, inferred using the following rules: For pharmacy prescription data, the date when the drug was dispensed plus the number of days of supply are used to extrapolate the End Date for the Drug Exposure. Depending on the country-specific healthcare system, this supply information is either explicitly provided in the day_supply field or inferred from package size or similar information. For Procedure Drugs, usually the drug is administered on a single date (i.e., the administration date). A standard Persistence Window of 30 days (gap, slack) is permitted between two subsequent such extrapolated DRUG_EXPOSURE records to be considered to be merged into a single Drug Era.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_exposure_count
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+gap_days
+
+
+
+
+The Gap Days determine how many total drug-free days are observed between all Drug Exposure events that contribute to a DRUG_ERA record. It is assumed that the drugs are “not stockpiled” by the patient, i.e. that if a new drug prescription or refill is observed (a new DRUG_EXPOSURE record is written), the remaining supply from the previous events is abandoned. The difference between Persistence Window and Gap Days is that the former is the maximum drug-free time allowed between two subsequent DRUG_EXPOSURE records, while the latter is the sum of actual drug-free days for the given Drug Era under the above assumption of non-stockpiling.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOSE_ERA
@@ -724,6 +10219,226 @@ div.tocify {
A Dose Era is defined as a span of time when the Person is assumed to be exposed to a constant dose of a specific active ingredient.
ETL Conventions
Dose Eras will be derived from records in the DRUG_EXPOSURE table and the Dose information from the DRUG_STRENGTH table using a standardized algorithm. Dose Form information is not taken into account. So, if the patient changes between different formulations, or different manufacturers with the same formulation, the Dose Era is still spanning the entire time of exposure to the Ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Drug
+
+
+
+
+unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the unit of the specific drug ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Unit
+
+
+
+
+dose_value
+
+
+The numeric value of the dosage of the drug_ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_start_datetime
+
+
+The date the Person started on the specific dosage, with at least 31 days since any prior exposure.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+dose_era_end_datetime
+
+
+
+
+The date the Person was no longer exposed to the dosage of the specific drug ingredient. An era is ended if there are 31 days or more between dosage records.
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONDITION_ERA
@@ -735,6 +10450,198 @@ div.tocify {
ETL Conventions
Each Condition Era corresponds to one or many Condition Occurrence records that form a continuous interval. The condition_concept_id field contains Concepts that are identical to those of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE table records that make up the Condition Era. In contrast to Drug Eras, Condition Eras are not aggregated to contain Conditions of different hierarchical layers. The SQl Script for generating CONDITION_ERA records can be found here The Condition Era Start Date is the start date of the first Condition Occurrence. The Condition Era End Date is the end date of the last Condition Occurrence. Condition Eras are built with a Persistence Window of 30 days, meaning, if no occurrence of the same condition_concept_id happens within 30 days of any one occurrence, it will be considered the condition_era_end_date.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+person_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+bigint
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+PERSON
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id representing the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+Condition
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_start_datetime
+
+
+The start date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the start date of the very first chronologically recorded instance of the condition with at least 31 days since any prior record of the same Condition.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_era_end_datetime
+
+
+The end date for the Condition Era constructed from the individual instances of Condition Occurrences. It is the end date of the final continuously recorded instance of the Condition.
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+condition_occurrence_count
+
+
+The number of individual Condition Occurrences used to construct the condition era.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -743,11 +10650,516 @@ div.tocify {
METADATA
Table Description
The METADATA table contains metadata information about a dataset that has been transformed to the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_type_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_string
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(250)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+value_as_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+metadata_datetime
+
+
+
+
+
+
+datetime
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
CDM_SOURCE
Table Description
The CDM_SOURCE table contains detail about the source database and the process used to transform the data into the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_name
+
+
+The name of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_source_abbreviation
+
+
+The abbreviation of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(25)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_holder
+
+
+The holder of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_description
+
+
+The description of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_documentation_reference
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_etl_reference
+
+
+
+
+Put the link to the CDM version used.
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_release_date
+
+
+The release date of the source data.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_release_date
+
+
+The release data of the CDM instance.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cdm_version
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(10)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
@@ -758,52 +11170,2001 @@ div.tocify {
The Standardized Vocabularies contains records, or Concepts, that uniquely identify each fundamental unit of meaning used to express clinical information in all domain tables of the CDM. Concepts are derived from vocabularies, which represent clinical information across a domain (e.g. conditions, drugs, procedures) through the use of codes and associated descriptions. Some Concepts are designated Standard Concepts, meaning these Concepts can be used as normative expressions of a clinical entity within the OMOP Common Data Model and within standardized analytics. Each Standard Concept belongs to one domain, which defines the location where the Concept would be expected to occur within data tables of the CDM.
Concepts can represent broad categories (like ‘Cardiovascular disease’), detailed clinical elements (‘Myocardial infarction of the anterolateral wall’) or modifying characteristics and attributes that define Concepts at various levels of detail (severity of a disease, associated morphology, etc.).
Records in the Standardized Vocabularies tables are derived from national or international vocabularies such as SNOMED-CT, RxNorm, and LOINC, or custom Concepts defined to cover various aspects of observational data analysis.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Concept across all domains.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_name
+
+
+An unambiguous, meaningful and descriptive name for the Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the DOMAIN table the Concept belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+DOMAIN
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table indicating from which source the Concept has been adapted.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+The attribute or concept class of the Concept. Examples are ‘Clinical Drug’, ‘Ingredient’, ‘Clinical Finding’ etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT_CLASS
+
+
+
+
+
+
+standard_concept
+
+
+This flag determines where a Concept is a Standard Concept, i.e. is used in the data, a Classification Concept, or a non-standard Source Concept. The allowable values are ‘S’ (Standard Concept) and ‘C’ (Classification Concept), otherwise the content is NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_code
+
+
+The concept code represents the identifier of the Concept in the source vocabulary, such as SNOMED-CT concept IDs, RxNorm RXCUIs etc. Note that concept codes are not unique across vocabularies.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970, meaning, the Concept has no (known) date of inception.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new concept. The default value is 31-Dec-2099, meaning, the Concept is valid until it becomes deprecated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the Concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VOCABULARY
Table Description
The VOCABULARY table includes a list of the Vocabularies collected from various sources or created de novo by the OMOP community. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Vocabulary source and includes a descriptive name and other associated attributes for the Vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_id
+
+
+A unique identifier for each Vocabulary, such as ICD9CM, SNOMED, Visit.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_name
+
+
+The name describing the vocabulary, for example International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, Volume 1 and 2 (NCHS) etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_reference
+
+
+External reference to documentation or available download of the about the vocabulary.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_version
+
+
+Version of the Vocabulary as indicated in the source.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+vocabulary_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Vocabulary the VOCABULARY record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
DOMAIN
Table Description
The DOMAIN table includes a list of OMOP-defined Domains the Concepts of the Standardized Vocabularies can belong to. A Domain defines the set of allowable Concepts for the standardized fields in the CDM tables. For example, the “Condition” Domain contains Concepts that describe a condition of a patient, and these Concepts can only be stored in the condition_concept_id field of the CONDITION_OCCURRENCE and CONDITION_ERA tables. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Domain and includes a descriptive name for the Domain.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_id
+
+
+A unique key for each domain.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_name
+
+
+The name describing the Domain, e.g. Condition, Procedure, Measurement etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+domain_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept representing the Domain Concept the DOMAIN record belongs to.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_CLASS
Table Description
The CONCEPT_CLASS table is a reference table, which includes a list of the classifications used to differentiate Concepts within a given Vocabulary. This reference table is populated with a single record for each Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_id
+
+
+A unique key for each class.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_name
+
+
+The name describing the Concept Class, e.g. Clinical Finding, Ingredient, etc.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_class_concept_id
+
+
+A Concept that represents the Concept Class.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table contains records that define direct relationships between any two Concepts and the nature or type of the relationship. Each type of a relationship is defined in the RELATIONSHIP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_1
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id_2
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+The relationship between CONCEPT_ID_1 and CONCEPT_ID_2. Please see the Vocabulary Conventions. for more information.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+RELATIONSHIP
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the relationship is invalidated.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the relationship was invalidated. Possible values are ‘D’ (deleted), ‘U’ (updated) or NULL.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
RELATIONSHIP
Table Description
The RELATIONSHIP table provides a reference list of all types of relationships that can be used to associate any two concepts in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHP table.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+is_hierarchical
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+defines_ancestry
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+reverse_relationship_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+relationship_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_SYNONYM
Table Description
The CONCEPT_SYNONYM table is used to store alternate names and descriptions for Concepts.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+concept_synonym_name
+
+
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1000)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+language_concept_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
CONCEPT_ANCESTOR
Table Description
The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table is designed to simplify observational analysis by providing the complete hierarchical relationships between Concepts. Only direct parent-child relationships between Concepts are stored in the CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP table. To determine higher level ancestry connections, all individual direct relationships would have to be navigated at analysis time. The CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table includes records for all parent-child relationships, as well as grandparent-grandchild relationships and those of any other level of lineage. Using the CONCEPT_ANCESTOR table allows for querying for all descendants of a hierarchical concept. For example, drug ingredients and drug products are all descendants of a drug class ancestor.
This table is entirely derived from the CONCEPT, CONCEPT_RELATIONSHIP and RELATIONSHIP tables.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ancestor_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the higher-level concept that forms the ancestor in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+descendant_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept Id for the lower-level concept that forms the descendant in the relationship.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+min_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The minimum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+max_levels_of_separation
+
+
+The maximum separation in number of levels of hierarchy between ancestor and descendant concepts. This is an attribute that is used to simplify hierarchic analysis.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP
Table Description
The source to concept map table is a legacy data structure within the OMOP Common Data Model, recommended for use in ETL processes to maintain local source codes which are not available as Concepts in the Standardized Vocabularies, and to establish mappings for each source code into a Standard Concept as target_concept_ids that can be used to populate the Common Data Model tables. The SOURCE_TO_CONCEPT_MAP table is no longer populated with content within the Standardized Vocabularies published to the OMOP community.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code
+
+
+The source code being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(50)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_concept_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the Source Concept that is being translated into a Standard Concept.
+
+
+This is either 0 or should be a number above 2 billion, which are the Concepts reserved for site-specific codes and mappings.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_vocabulary_id
+
+
+A foreign key to the VOCABULARY table defining the vocabulary of the source code that is being translated to a Standard Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+source_code_description
+
+
+An optional description for the source code. This is included as a convenience to compare the description of the source code to the name of the concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_concept_id
+
+
+The target Concept to which the source code is being mapped.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+target_vocabulary_id
+
+
+The Vocabulary of the target Concept.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(20)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+VOCABULARY
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance was first recorded.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when the mapping instance became invalid because it was deleted or superseded (updated) by a new relationship. Default value is 31-Dec-2099.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the mapping instance was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
DRUG_STRENGTH
Table Description
The DRUG_STRENGTH table contains structured content about the amount or concentration and associated units of a specific ingredient contained within a particular drug product. This table is supplemental information to support standardized analysis of drug utilization.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+drug_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Branded Drug or Clinical Drug Product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+ingredient_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+Combination Drugs will have more than one record in this table, one for each active Ingredient.
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_value
+
+
+The numeric value or the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+amount_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the amount of active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_value
+
+
+The concentration of the active ingredient contained within the drug product.
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+numerator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the Unit of measure for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_value
+
+
+The amount of total liquid (or other divisible product, such as ointment, gel, spray, etc.).
+
+
+
+
+float
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+denominator_unit_concept_id
+
+
+The Concept representing the denominator unit for the concentration of active ingredient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+box_size
+
+
+The number of units of Clinical Branded Drug or Quantified Clinical or Branded Drug contained in a box as dispensed to the patient.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_start_date
+
+
+The date when the Concept was first recorded. The default value is 1-Jan-1970.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+valid_end_date
+
+
+The date when then Concept became invalid.
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+invalid_reason
+
+
+Reason the concept was invalidated. Possible values are D (deleted), U (replaced with an update) or NULL when valid_end_date has the default value.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(1)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
COHORT
@@ -811,11 +13172,366 @@ div.tocify {
The COHORT table contains records of subjects that satisfy a given set of criteria for a duration of time. The definition of the cohort is contained within the COHORT_DEFINITION table. It is listed as part of the RESULTS schema because it is a table that users of the database as well as tools such as ATLAS need to be able to write to. The CDM and Vocabulary tables are all read-only so it is suggested that the COHORT and COHORT_DEFINTION tables are kept in a separate schema to alleviate confusion.
ETL Conventions
Cohorts typically include patients diagnosed with a specific condition, patients exposed to a particular drug, but can also be Providers who have performed a specific Procedure. Cohort records must have a Start Date and an End Date, but the End Date may be set to Start Date or could have an applied censor date using the Observation Period Start Date. Cohort records must contain a Subject Id, which can refer to the Person, Provider, Visit record or Care Site though they are most often Person Ids. The Cohort Definition will define the type of subject through the subject concept id. A subject can belong (or not belong) to a cohort at any moment in time. A subject can only have one record in the cohort table for any moment of time, i.e. it is not possible for a person to contain multiple records indicating cohort membership that are overlapping in time
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+subject_id
+
+
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_start_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_end_date
+
+
+
+
+
+
+date
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
COHORT_DEFINITION
Table Description
The COHORT_DEFINITION table contains records defining a Cohort derived from the data through the associated description and syntax and upon instantiation (execution of the algorithm) placed into the COHORT table. Cohorts are a set of subjects that satisfy a given combination of inclusion criteria for a duration of time. The COHORT_DEFINITION table provides a standardized structure for maintaining the rules governing the inclusion of a subject into a cohort, and can store operational programming code to instantiate the cohort within the OMOP Common Data Model.
+
+
+
+
+CDM Field
+
+
+User Guide
+
+
+ETL Conventions
+
+
+Datatype
+
+
+Required
+
+
+Primary Key
+
+
+Foreign Key
+
+
+FK Table
+
+
+FK Domain
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_id
+
+
+This is the identifier given to the cohort, usually by the ATLAS application
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+COHORT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_name
+
+
+A short description of the cohort
+
+
+
+
+varchar(255)
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_description
+
+
+A complete description of the cohort.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+definition_type_concept_id
+
+
+Type defining what kind of Cohort Definition the record represents and how the syntax may be executed.
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_definition_syntax
+
+
+Syntax or code to operationalize the Cohort Definition.
+
+
+
+
+varchar(MAX)
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+No
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+subject_concept_id
+
+
+This field contains a Concept that represents the domain of the subjects that are members of the cohort (e.g., Person, Provider, Visit).
+
+
+
+
+integer
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+No
+
+
+Yes
+
+
+CONCEPT
+
+
+
+
+
+
+cohort_initiation_date
+
+
+A date to indicate when the Cohort was initiated in the COHORT table.
+
If you have arrived to this page then you must be thinking HELP! I have some data that doesn’t fit in the CDM! Never fear as this handy guide will point you in the right direction and all you have to do is answer a few questions.
-
First things first, do you think you will need to change the OMOP Common Data Model itself or are you solely looking for vocabulary support?
First things first, do you have a documented network use case for this data? This could take the form of an upcoming study or a convention for how to store information. In this scenario, at least two or more collaborators with data to contribute constitute a network need.