databricks-cli/bundle/config/mutator/process_target_mode_test.go

505 lines
19 KiB
Go
Raw Permalink Normal View History

package mutator
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
import (
"context"
"reflect"
"strings"
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
"testing"
"github.com/databricks/cli/bundle"
"github.com/databricks/cli/bundle/config"
"github.com/databricks/cli/bundle/config/resources"
"github.com/databricks/cli/libs/diag"
"github.com/databricks/cli/libs/tags"
sdkconfig "github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/config"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/catalog"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/compute"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/iam"
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/jobs"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/ml"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/pipelines"
"github.com/databricks/databricks-sdk-go/service/serving"
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func mockBundle(mode config.Mode) *bundle.Bundle {
return &bundle.Bundle{
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
Config: config.Root{
Bundle: config.Bundle{
Mode: mode,
Add validation for Git settings in bundles (#578) ## Changes This checks whether the Git settings are consistent with the actual Git state of a source directory. (This PR adds to https://github.com/databricks/cli/pull/577.) Previously, we would silently let users configure their Git branch to e.g. `main` and deploy with that metadata even if they were actually on a different branch. With these changes, the following config would result in an error when deployed from any other branch than `main`: ``` bundle: name: example workspace: git: branch: main environments: ... ``` > not on the right Git branch: > expected according to configuration: main > actual: my-feature-branch It's not very useful to set the same branch for all environments, though. For development, it's better to just let the CLI auto-detect the right branch. Therefore, it's now possible to set the branch just for a single environment: ``` bundle: name: example 2 environments: development: default: true production: # production can only be deployed from the 'main' branch git: branch: main ``` Adding to that, the `mode: production` option actually checks that users explicitly set the Git branch as seen above. Setting that branch helps avoid mistakes, where someone accidentally deploys to production from the wrong branch. (I could see us offering an escape hatch for that in the future.) # Testing Manual testing to validate the experience and error messages. Automated unit tests. --------- Co-authored-by: Fabian Jakobs <fabian.jakobs@databricks.com>
2023-07-30 12:44:33 +00:00
Git: config.Git{
OriginURL: "http://origin",
Branch: "main",
},
},
Workspace: config.Workspace{
CurrentUser: &config.User{
ShortName: "lennart",
User: &iam.User{
UserName: "lennart@company.com",
Id: "1",
},
},
StatePath: "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/state",
ArtifactPath: "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/artifacts",
FilePath: "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/files",
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
},
Resources: config.Resources{
Jobs: map[string]*resources.Job{
"job1": {
JobSettings: &jobs.JobSettings{
Name: "job1",
Schedule: &jobs.CronSchedule{
QuartzCronExpression: "* * * * *",
},
Tags: map[string]string{"existing": "tag"},
},
},
"job2": {
JobSettings: &jobs.JobSettings{
Name: "job2",
Schedule: &jobs.CronSchedule{
QuartzCronExpression: "* * * * *",
PauseStatus: jobs.PauseStatusUnpaused,
},
},
},
"job3": {
JobSettings: &jobs.JobSettings{
Name: "job3",
Trigger: &jobs.TriggerSettings{
FileArrival: &jobs.FileArrivalTriggerConfiguration{
Url: "test.com",
},
},
},
},
"job4": {
JobSettings: &jobs.JobSettings{
Name: "job4",
Continuous: &jobs.Continuous{
PauseStatus: jobs.PauseStatusPaused,
},
},
},
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
},
Pipelines: map[string]*resources.Pipeline{
"pipeline1": {PipelineSpec: &pipelines.PipelineSpec{Name: "pipeline1", Continuous: true}},
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
},
Experiments: map[string]*resources.MlflowExperiment{
"experiment1": {Experiment: &ml.Experiment{Name: "/Users/lennart.kats@databricks.com/experiment1"}},
"experiment2": {Experiment: &ml.Experiment{Name: "experiment2"}},
},
Models: map[string]*resources.MlflowModel{
"model1": {Model: &ml.Model{Name: "model1"}},
},
ModelServingEndpoints: map[string]*resources.ModelServingEndpoint{
"servingendpoint1": {CreateServingEndpoint: &serving.CreateServingEndpoint{Name: "servingendpoint1"}},
},
RegisteredModels: map[string]*resources.RegisteredModel{
"registeredmodel1": {CreateRegisteredModelRequest: &catalog.CreateRegisteredModelRequest{Name: "registeredmodel1"}},
},
QualityMonitors: map[string]*resources.QualityMonitor{
"qualityMonitor1": {CreateMonitor: &catalog.CreateMonitor{TableName: "qualityMonitor1"}},
"qualityMonitor2": {
CreateMonitor: &catalog.CreateMonitor{
TableName: "qualityMonitor2",
Schedule: &catalog.MonitorCronSchedule{},
},
},
"qualityMonitor3": {
CreateMonitor: &catalog.CreateMonitor{
TableName: "qualityMonitor3",
Schedule: &catalog.MonitorCronSchedule{
PauseStatus: catalog.MonitorCronSchedulePauseStatusUnpaused,
},
},
},
},
Schemas: map[string]*resources.Schema{
"schema1": {CreateSchema: &catalog.CreateSchema{Name: "schema1"}},
},
Clusters: map[string]*resources.Cluster{
"cluster1": {ClusterSpec: &compute.ClusterSpec{ClusterName: "cluster1", SparkVersion: "13.2.x", NumWorkers: 1}},
},
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
},
},
// Use AWS implementation for testing.
Tagging: tags.ForCloud(&sdkconfig.Config{
Host: "https://company.cloud.databricks.com",
}),
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
}
}
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
func TestProcessTargetModeDevelopment(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
// Job 1
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] job1", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["existing"], "tag")
assert.Equal(t, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["dev"], "lennart")
assert.Equal(t, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Schedule.PauseStatus, jobs.PauseStatusPaused)
// Job 2
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] job2", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].Tags["dev"], "lennart")
assert.Equal(t, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].Schedule.PauseStatus, jobs.PauseStatusUnpaused)
// Pipeline 1
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] pipeline1", b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, false, b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].Continuous)
assert.True(t, b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].PipelineSpec.Development)
// Experiment 1
assert.Equal(t, "/Users/lennart.kats@databricks.com/[dev lennart] experiment1", b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment1"].Name)
assert.Contains(t, b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment1"].Experiment.Tags, ml.ExperimentTag{Key: "dev", Value: "lennart"})
assert.Equal(t, "dev", b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment1"].Experiment.Tags[0].Key)
// Experiment 2
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] experiment2", b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment2"].Name)
assert.Contains(t, b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment2"].Experiment.Tags, ml.ExperimentTag{Key: "dev", Value: "lennart"})
// Model 1
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] model1", b.Config.Resources.Models["model1"].Name)
assert.Contains(t, b.Config.Resources.Models["model1"].Tags, ml.ModelTag{Key: "dev", Value: "lennart"})
// Model serving endpoint 1
assert.Equal(t, "dev_lennart_servingendpoint1", b.Config.Resources.ModelServingEndpoints["servingendpoint1"].Name)
// Registered model 1
assert.Equal(t, "dev_lennart_registeredmodel1", b.Config.Resources.RegisteredModels["registeredmodel1"].Name)
// Quality Monitor 1
assert.Equal(t, "qualityMonitor1", b.Config.Resources.QualityMonitors["qualityMonitor1"].TableName)
assert.Nil(t, b.Config.Resources.QualityMonitors["qualityMonitor2"].Schedule)
assert.Equal(t, catalog.MonitorCronSchedulePauseStatusUnpaused, b.Config.Resources.QualityMonitors["qualityMonitor3"].Schedule.PauseStatus)
// Schema 1
assert.Equal(t, "dev_lennart_schema1", b.Config.Resources.Schemas["schema1"].Name)
// Clusters
assert.Equal(t, "[dev lennart] cluster1", b.Config.Resources.Clusters["cluster1"].ClusterName)
}
func TestProcessTargetModeDevelopmentTagNormalizationForAws(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Tagging = tags.ForCloud(&sdkconfig.Config{
Host: "https://dbc-XXXXXXXX-YYYY.cloud.databricks.com/",
})
b.Config.Workspace.CurrentUser.ShortName = "Héllö wörld?!"
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
// Assert that tag normalization took place.
assert.Equal(t, "Hello world__", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["dev"])
}
func TestProcessTargetModeDevelopmentTagNormalizationForAzure(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Tagging = tags.ForCloud(&sdkconfig.Config{
Host: "https://adb-xxx.y.azuredatabricks.net/",
})
b.Config.Workspace.CurrentUser.ShortName = "Héllö wörld?!"
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
// Assert that tag normalization took place (Azure allows more characters than AWS).
assert.Equal(t, "Héllö wörld?!", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["dev"])
}
func TestProcessTargetModeDevelopmentTagNormalizationForGcp(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Tagging = tags.ForCloud(&sdkconfig.Config{
Host: "https://123.4.gcp.databricks.com/",
})
b.Config.Workspace.CurrentUser.ShortName = "Héllö wörld?!"
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
// Assert that tag normalization took place.
assert.Equal(t, "Hello_world", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["dev"])
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
}
func TestValidateDevelopmentMode(t *testing.T) {
// Test with a valid development mode bundle
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
diags := validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
// Test with /Volumes path
b = mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Workspace.ArtifactPath = "/Volumes/catalog/schema/lennart/libs"
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
b.Config.Workspace.ArtifactPath = "/Volumes/catalog/schema/libs"
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "artifact_path should contain the current username or ${workspace.current_user.short_name} to ensure uniqueness when using 'mode: development'")
// Test with a bundle that has a non-user path
b = mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Workspace.RootPath = "/Shared/.bundle/x/y/state"
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "root_path must start with '~/' or contain the current username to ensure uniqueness when using 'mode: development'")
// Test with a bundle that has an unpaused trigger pause status
b = mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.TriggerPauseStatus = config.Unpaused
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "UNPAUSED")
// Test with a bundle that has a prefix not containing the username or short name
b = mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.NamePrefix = "[prod]"
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.Len(t, diags, 1)
assert.Equal(t, diag.Error, diags[0].Severity)
assert.Contains(t, diags[0].Summary, "")
// Test with a bundle that has valid user paths
b = mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Workspace.RootPath = "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/state"
b.Config.Workspace.StatePath = "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/state"
b.Config.Workspace.FilePath = "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/files"
b.Config.Workspace.ArtifactPath = "/Users/lennart@company.com/.bundle/x/y/artifacts"
diags = validateDevelopmentMode(b)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
}
func TestProcessTargetModeDefault(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle("")
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "job1", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "pipeline1", b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].Name)
assert.False(t, b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].PipelineSpec.Development)
assert.Equal(t, "servingendpoint1", b.Config.Resources.ModelServingEndpoints["servingendpoint1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "registeredmodel1", b.Config.Resources.RegisteredModels["registeredmodel1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "qualityMonitor1", b.Config.Resources.QualityMonitors["qualityMonitor1"].TableName)
assert.Equal(t, "cluster1", b.Config.Resources.Clusters["cluster1"].ClusterName)
}
func TestProcessTargetModeProduction(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Production)
diags := validateProductionMode(context.Background(), b, false)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "run_as")
b.Config.Workspace.StatePath = "/Shared/.bundle/x/y/state"
b.Config.Workspace.ArtifactPath = "/Shared/.bundle/x/y/artifacts"
b.Config.Workspace.FilePath = "/Shared/.bundle/x/y/files"
diags = validateProductionMode(context.Background(), b, false)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "production")
permissions := []resources.Permission{
{
Level: "CAN_MANAGE",
UserName: "user@company.com",
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
},
}
b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].RunAs = &jobs.JobRunAs{UserName: "user@company.com"}
b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].RunAs = &jobs.JobRunAs{UserName: "user@company.com"}
b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job3"].RunAs = &jobs.JobRunAs{UserName: "user@company.com"}
b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job4"].RunAs = &jobs.JobRunAs{UserName: "user@company.com"}
b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment1"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.Experiments["experiment2"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.Models["model1"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.ModelServingEndpoints["servingendpoint1"].Permissions = permissions
b.Config.Resources.Clusters["cluster1"].Permissions = permissions
diags = validateProductionMode(context.Background(), b, false)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "job1", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "pipeline1", b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].Name)
assert.False(t, b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].PipelineSpec.Development)
assert.Equal(t, "servingendpoint1", b.Config.Resources.ModelServingEndpoints["servingendpoint1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "registeredmodel1", b.Config.Resources.RegisteredModels["registeredmodel1"].Name)
assert.Equal(t, "qualityMonitor1", b.Config.Resources.QualityMonitors["qualityMonitor1"].TableName)
assert.Equal(t, "cluster1", b.Config.Resources.Clusters["cluster1"].ClusterName)
Add development runs (#522) This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE. ## bundle.yml changes In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as `mode: debug`: ``` environments: dev: default: true mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production ``` Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used just for running things for development. This results in several changes to deployed assets: * All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag * All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g. for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list) * All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form of garbage collection) * Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true' * Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter in the CLI * Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused * Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get skipped because the last run was still in progress) Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and `pull-request` (which is reserved for future use). ## CLI changes To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the following commands: ``` $ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ databricks bundle run shark_sighting ``` which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used. The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common combination of deploying & running: ``` $ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings ``` The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔 I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target compute. One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like environments that can display progress themselves). ``` $ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait ```
2023-07-12 06:51:54 +00:00
}
func TestProcessTargetModeProductionOkForPrincipal(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Production)
// Our target has all kinds of problems when not using service principals ...
diags := validateProductionMode(context.Background(), b, false)
require.Error(t, diags.Error())
// ... but we're much less strict when a principal is used
diags = validateProductionMode(context.Background(), b, true)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
}
// Make sure that we have test coverage for all resource types
func TestAllResourcesMocked(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
resources := reflect.ValueOf(b.Config.Resources)
for i := 0; i < resources.NumField(); i++ {
field := resources.Field(i)
if field.Kind() == reflect.Map {
assert.True(
t,
!field.IsNil() && field.Len() > 0,
"process_target_mode should support '%s' (please add it to process_target_mode.go and extend the test suite)",
resources.Type().Field(i).Name,
)
}
}
}
// Make sure that we at least rename all resources
func TestAllResourcesRenamed(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
Use dynamic configuration model in bundles (#1098) ## Changes This is a fundamental change to how we load and process bundle configuration. We now depend on the configuration being represented as a `dyn.Value`. This representation is functionally equivalent to Go's `any` (it is variadic) and allows us to capture metadata associated with a value, such as where it was defined (e.g. file, line, and column). It also allows us to represent Go's zero values properly (e.g. empty string, integer equal to 0, or boolean false). Using this representation allows us to let the configuration model deviate from the typed structure we have been relying on so far (`config.Root`). We need to deviate from these types when using variables for fields that are not a string themselves. For example, using `${var.num_workers}` for an integer `workers` field was impossible until now (though not implemented in this change). The loader for a `dyn.Value` includes functionality to capture any and all type mismatches between the user-defined configuration and the expected types. These mismatches can be surfaced as validation errors in future PRs. Given that many mutators expect the typed struct to be the source of truth, this change converts between the dynamic representation and the typed representation on mutator entry and exit. Existing mutators can continue to modify the typed representation and these modifications are reflected in the dynamic representation (see `MarkMutatorEntry` and `MarkMutatorExit` in `bundle/config/root.go`). Required changes included in this change: * The existing interpolation package is removed in favor of `libs/dyn/dynvar`. * Functionality to merge job clusters, job tasks, and pipeline clusters are now all broken out into their own mutators. To be implemented later: * Allow variable references for non-string types. * Surface diagnostics about the configuration provided by the user in the validation output. * Some mutators use a resource's configuration file path to resolve related relative paths. These depend on `bundle/config/paths.Path` being set and populated through `ConfigureConfigFilePath`. Instead, they should interact with the dynamically typed configuration directly. Doing this also unlocks being able to differentiate different base paths used within a job (e.g. a task override with a relative path defined in a directory other than the base job). ## Tests * Existing unit tests pass (some have been modified to accommodate) * Integration tests pass
2024-02-16 19:41:58 +00:00
resources := reflect.ValueOf(b.Config.Resources)
for i := 0; i < resources.NumField(); i++ {
field := resources.Field(i)
if field.Kind() == reflect.Map {
for _, key := range field.MapKeys() {
resource := field.MapIndex(key)
nameField := resource.Elem().FieldByName("Name")
if nameField.IsValid() && nameField.Kind() == reflect.String {
assert.True(
t,
strings.Contains(nameField.String(), "dev"),
"process_target_mode should rename '%s' in '%s'",
key,
resources.Type().Field(i).Name,
)
}
}
}
}
}
Disable locking for development mode (#1302) ## Changes This changes `databricks bundle deploy` so that it skips the lock acquisition/release step for a `mode: development` target: * This saves about 2 seconds (measured over 100 runs on a quiet/busy workspace). * This helps avoid the `deploy lock acquired by lennart@company.com at 2024-02-28 15:48:38.40603 +0100 CET. Use --force-lock to override` error * Risk: this may cause deployment conflicts, but since dev mode deployments are always scoped to a user, that risk should be minimal Update after discussion: * This behavior can now be disabled via a setting. * Docs PR: https://github.com/databricks/docs/pull/15873 ## Measurements ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to an empty workspace _Before this branch:_ p50 time: 11.479 seconds p90 time: 11.757 seconds _After this branch:_ p50 time: 9.386 seconds p90 time: 9.599 seconds ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to a busy (staging) workspace _Before this branch:_ * p50 time: 13.335 seconds * p90 time: 15.295 seconds _After this branch:_ * p50 time: 11.397 seconds * p90 time: 11.743 seconds ### Typical duration of deployment steps * Acquiring Deployment Lock: 1.096 seconds * Deployment Preparations and Operations: 1.477 seconds * Uploading Artifacts: 1.26 seconds * Finalizing Deployment: 9.699 seconds * Releasing Deployment Lock: 1.198 seconds --------- Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pcnoordhuis@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Nester <andrew.nester.dev@gmail.com>
2024-04-18 01:59:39 +00:00
func TestDisableLocking(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
transformDevelopmentMode(ctx, b)
Disable locking for development mode (#1302) ## Changes This changes `databricks bundle deploy` so that it skips the lock acquisition/release step for a `mode: development` target: * This saves about 2 seconds (measured over 100 runs on a quiet/busy workspace). * This helps avoid the `deploy lock acquired by lennart@company.com at 2024-02-28 15:48:38.40603 +0100 CET. Use --force-lock to override` error * Risk: this may cause deployment conflicts, but since dev mode deployments are always scoped to a user, that risk should be minimal Update after discussion: * This behavior can now be disabled via a setting. * Docs PR: https://github.com/databricks/docs/pull/15873 ## Measurements ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to an empty workspace _Before this branch:_ p50 time: 11.479 seconds p90 time: 11.757 seconds _After this branch:_ p50 time: 9.386 seconds p90 time: 9.599 seconds ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to a busy (staging) workspace _Before this branch:_ * p50 time: 13.335 seconds * p90 time: 15.295 seconds _After this branch:_ * p50 time: 11.397 seconds * p90 time: 11.743 seconds ### Typical duration of deployment steps * Acquiring Deployment Lock: 1.096 seconds * Deployment Preparations and Operations: 1.477 seconds * Uploading Artifacts: 1.26 seconds * Finalizing Deployment: 9.699 seconds * Releasing Deployment Lock: 1.198 seconds --------- Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pcnoordhuis@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Nester <andrew.nester.dev@gmail.com>
2024-04-18 01:59:39 +00:00
assert.False(t, b.Config.Bundle.Deployment.Lock.IsEnabled())
}
func TestDisableLockingDisabled(t *testing.T) {
ctx := context.Background()
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
explicitlyEnabled := true
b.Config.Bundle.Deployment.Lock.Enabled = &explicitlyEnabled
transformDevelopmentMode(ctx, b)
Disable locking for development mode (#1302) ## Changes This changes `databricks bundle deploy` so that it skips the lock acquisition/release step for a `mode: development` target: * This saves about 2 seconds (measured over 100 runs on a quiet/busy workspace). * This helps avoid the `deploy lock acquired by lennart@company.com at 2024-02-28 15:48:38.40603 +0100 CET. Use --force-lock to override` error * Risk: this may cause deployment conflicts, but since dev mode deployments are always scoped to a user, that risk should be minimal Update after discussion: * This behavior can now be disabled via a setting. * Docs PR: https://github.com/databricks/docs/pull/15873 ## Measurements ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to an empty workspace _Before this branch:_ p50 time: 11.479 seconds p90 time: 11.757 seconds _After this branch:_ p50 time: 9.386 seconds p90 time: 9.599 seconds ### 100 deployments of the "python_default" project to a busy (staging) workspace _Before this branch:_ * p50 time: 13.335 seconds * p90 time: 15.295 seconds _After this branch:_ * p50 time: 11.397 seconds * p90 time: 11.743 seconds ### Typical duration of deployment steps * Acquiring Deployment Lock: 1.096 seconds * Deployment Preparations and Operations: 1.477 seconds * Uploading Artifacts: 1.26 seconds * Finalizing Deployment: 9.699 seconds * Releasing Deployment Lock: 1.198 seconds --------- Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pcnoordhuis@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Andrew Nester <andrew.nester.dev@gmail.com>
2024-04-18 01:59:39 +00:00
assert.True(t, b.Config.Bundle.Deployment.Lock.IsEnabled(), "Deployment lock should remain enabled in development mode when explicitly enabled")
}
func TestPrefixAlreadySet(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.NamePrefix = "custom_lennart_deploy_"
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "custom_lennart_deploy_job1", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Name)
}
func TestTagsAlreadySet(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.Tags = map[string]string{
"custom": "tag",
"dev": "foo",
}
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "tag", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["custom"])
assert.Equal(t, "foo", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].Tags["dev"])
}
func TestTagsNil(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.Tags = nil
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "lennart", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].Tags["dev"])
}
func TestTagsEmptySet(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.Tags = map[string]string{}
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, "lennart", b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job2"].Tags["dev"])
}
func TestJobsMaxConcurrentRunsAlreadySet(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.JobsMaxConcurrentRuns = 10
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, 10, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].MaxConcurrentRuns)
}
func TestJobsMaxConcurrentRunsDisabled(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.JobsMaxConcurrentRuns = 1
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.Equal(t, 1, b.Config.Resources.Jobs["job1"].MaxConcurrentRuns)
}
func TestTriggerPauseStatusWhenUnpaused(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
b.Config.Presets.TriggerPauseStatus = config.Unpaused
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.ErrorContains(t, diags.Error(), "target with 'mode: development' cannot set trigger pause status to UNPAUSED by default")
}
func TestPipelinesDevelopmentDisabled(t *testing.T) {
b := mockBundle(config.Development)
notEnabled := false
b.Config.Presets.PipelinesDevelopment = &notEnabled
m := bundle.Seq(ProcessTargetMode(), ApplyPresets())
diags := bundle.Apply(context.Background(), b, m)
require.NoError(t, diags.Error())
assert.False(t, b.Config.Resources.Pipelines["pipeline1"].PipelineSpec.Development)
}