## Changes
Now it's possible to configure new `app` resource in bundle and point it
to the custom `source_code_path` location where Databricks App code is
defined.
On `databricks bundle deploy` DABs will create an app. All consecutive
`databricks bundle deploy` execution will update an existing app if
there are any updated
On `databricks bundle run <my_app>` DABs will execute app deployment. If
the app is not started yet, it will start the app first.
### Bundle configuration
```
bundle:
name: apps
variables:
my_job_id:
description: "ID of job to run app"
lookup:
job: "My Job"
databricks_name:
description: "Name for app user"
additional_flags:
description: "Additional flags to run command app"
default: ""
my_app_config:
type: complex
description: "Configuration for my Databricks App"
default:
command:
- flask
- --app
- hello
- run
- ${var.additional_flags}
env:
- name: DATABRICKS_NAME
value: ${var.databricks_name}
resources:
apps:
my_app:
name: "anester-app" # required and has to be unique
description: "My App"
source_code_path: ./app # required and points to location of app code
config: ${var.my_app_config}
resources:
- name: "my-job"
description: "A job for app to be able to run"
job:
id: ${var.my_job_id}
permission: "CAN_MANAGE_RUN"
permissions:
- user_name: "foo@bar.com"
level: "CAN_VIEW"
- service_principal_name: "my_sp"
level: "CAN_MANAGE"
targets:
dev:
variables:
databricks_name: "Andrew (from dev)"
additional_flags: --debug
prod:
variables:
databricks_name: "Andrew (from prod)"
```
### Execution
1. `databricks bundle deploy -t dev`
2. `databricks bundle run my_app -t dev`
**If app is started**
```
✓ Getting the status of the app my-app
✓ App is in RUNNING state
✓ Preparing source code for new app deployment.
✓ Deployment is pending
✓ Starting app with command: flask --app hello run --debug
✓ App started successfully
You can access the app at <app-url>
```
**If app is not started**
```
✓ Getting the status of the app my-app
✓ App is in UNAVAILABLE state
✓ Starting the app my-app
✓ App is starting...
....
✓ App is starting...
✓ App is started!
✓ Preparing source code for new app deployment.
✓ Downloading source code from /Workspace/Users/...
✓ Starting app with command: flask --app hello run --debug
✓ App started successfully
You can access the app at <app-url>
```
## Tests
Added unit and config tests + manual test.
```
--- PASS: TestAccDeployBundleWithApp (404.59s)
PASS
coverage: 36.8% of statements in ./...
ok github.com/databricks/cli/internal/bundle 405.035s coverage: 36.8% of statements in ./...
```
## Changes
- Enable new linter: testifylint.
- Apply fixes with --fix.
- Fix remaining issues (mostly with aider).
There were 2 cases we --fix did the wrong thing - this seems to a be a
bug in linter: https://github.com/Antonboom/testifylint/issues/210
Nonetheless, I kept that check enabled, it seems useful, just need to be
fixed manually after autofix.
## Tests
Existing tests
## Changes
This PR ensures that when new resources are added they are handled by
top-level permissions mutator, either by supporting or not supporting
the resource type.
## Tests
Added unit tests
## Changes
If only key was defined for a job in YAML config, validate previously
failed with segfault.
This PR validates that jobs are correctly defined and returns an error
if not.
## Tests
Added regression test
## Changes
This diagnostics type allows us to capture multiple warnings as well as
errors in the return value. This is a preparation for returning
additional warnings from mutators in case we detect non-fatal problems.
* All return statements that previously returned an error now return
`diag.FromErr`
* All return statements that previously returned `fmt.Errorf` now return
`diag.Errorf`
* All `err != nil` checks now use `diags.HasError()` or `diags.Error()`
## Tests
* Existing tests pass.
* I confirmed no call site under `./bundle` or `./cmd/bundle` uses
`errors.Is` on the return value from mutators. This is relevant because
we cannot wrap errors with `%w` when calling `diag.Errorf` (like
`fmt.Errorf`; context in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/47641).
## Changes
The code relied on the `Name` property being accessible for every
resource. This is generally true, but because these property structs are
embedded as pointer, they can be nil. This is also why the tests had to
initialize the embedded struct to pass. This changes the approach to use
the keys from the resource map instead, so that we no longer rely on the
non-nil embedded struct.
Note: we should evaluate whether we should turn these into values
instead of pointers. I don't recall if we get value from them being
pointers.
## Tests
Unit tests pass.
## Changes
Now it's possible to define top level `permissions` section in bundle
configuration and permissions defined there will be applied to all
resources defined in the bundle.
Supported top-level permission levels: CAN_MANAGE, CAN_VIEW, CAN_RUN.
Permissions are applied to: Jobs, DLT Pipelines, ML Models, ML
Experiments and Model Service Endpoints
```
bundle:
name: permissions
workspace:
host: ***
permissions:
- level: CAN_VIEW
group_name: test-group
- level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: user@company.com
- level: CAN_RUN
service_principal_name: 123456-abcdef
```
## Tests
Added corresponding unit tests + ran `bundle validate` and `bundle
deploy` manually
Andrew Nester
Denis Bilenko
Pieter Noordhuis