## Changes
This PR adds checks during bundle config load and merge to error out if
there are duplicate keys for resource definitions
## Tests
Using unit tests and manually
## Changes
1. Events are now printed in chronological order
2. Simplify events rendering by removing update/flow name. This makes it
more consistent with the web UI too
3. Switch to server side filtering on update_id
## Tests
Manually
Happy run:
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T pipeline-progress % bricks bundle run foo
2023-04-12T20:00:22.879Z update_progress INFO "Update e1becc is INITIALIZING."
2023-04-12T20:00:22.906Z update_progress INFO "Update e1becc is SETTING_UP_TABLES."
2023-04-12T20:00:24.496Z update_progress INFO "Update e1becc is RUNNING."
2023-04-12T20:00:24.497Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is QUEUED."
2023-04-12T20:00:24.586Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is STARTING."
2023-04-12T20:00:24.748Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is RUNNING."
2023-04-12T20:00:26.672Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' has COMPLETED."
2023-04-12T20:00:27.753Z update_progress INFO "Update e1becc is COMPLETED."
```
Sad run:
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T pipeline-progress % bricks bundle run foo
2023-04-12T20:02:07.764Z update_progress INFO "Update 04b80e is INITIALIZING."
2023-04-12T20:02:07.870Z update_progress ERROR "Update 04b80e is FAILED."
Error: update failed
```
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
Output now:
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T pipeline-progress % bricks bundle run foo
The update can be found at https://e2-dogfood.staging.cloud.databricks.com/#joblist/pipelines/1cc605db-daab-4218-b38a-a63030e3eb03/updates/f92f2159-1141-47de-b1e2-1ca854b7238f
2023-04-12T20:41:19.813Z update_progress INFO "Update f92f21 is INITIALIZING."
2023-04-12T20:41:19.841Z update_progress INFO "Update f92f21 is SETTING_UP_TABLES."
2023-04-12T20:41:21.270Z update_progress INFO "Update f92f21 is RUNNING."
2023-04-12T20:41:21.271Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is QUEUED."
2023-04-12T20:41:21.349Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is STARTING."
2023-04-12T20:41:21.480Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' is RUNNING."
2023-04-12T20:41:23.493Z flow_progress INFO "Flow 'sales_orders_raw' has COMPLETED."
2023-04-12T20:41:25.484Z update_progress INFO "Update f92f21 is COMPLETED."
```
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
## Changes
Publish snapshot binaries to the snapshot release at
https://github.com/databricks/bricks/releases/tag/snapshot.
This means users have a stable URL to find snapshot builds instead of
having to navigate to a particular action run.
## Tests
Manually.
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
1. Log os.Args and bricks version before every command execution
2. After a command execution, logs the error and exit code
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
Manually,
case 1: Run `bricks version` successfully
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T bricks % bricks version --log-level=info --log-file stderr
time=2023-04-12T00:15:04.011+02:00 level=INFO source=root.go:34 msg="process args: [bricks, version, --log-level=info, --log-file, stderr]"
time=2023-04-12T00:15:04.011+02:00 level=INFO source=root.go:35 msg="version: 0.0.0-dev+375eb1c50283"
0.0.0-dev+375eb1c50283
time=2023-04-12T00:15:04.011+02:00 level=INFO source=root.go:68 msg="exit code: 0"
```
case 2: Run `bricks bundle deploy` in a working dir where `bundle.yml`
does not exist
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T bricks % bricks bundle deploy --log-level=info --log-file=stderr
time=2023-04-12T00:19:16.783+02:00 level=INFO source=root.go:34 msg="process args: [bricks, bundle, deploy, --log-level=info, --log-file=stderr]"
time=2023-04-12T00:19:16.784+02:00 level=INFO source=root.go:35 msg="version: 0.0.0-dev+375eb1c50283"
Error: unable to locate bundle root: bundle.yml not found
time=2023-04-12T00:19:16.784+02:00 level=ERROR source=root.go:64 msg="unable to locate bundle root: bundle.yml not found"
time=2023-04-12T00:19:16.784+02:00 level=ERROR source=root.go:65 msg="exit code: 1"
```
## Changes
`bricks bundle destroy` would fail if the sync snapshot did not exist
## Tests
Manually
After:
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T bundle-destroy % bricks bundle destroy --auto-approve
No resources to destroy!
Remote directory /Users/shreyas.goenka@databricks.com/.bundle/destroy/default will be deleted
Successfully deleted files!
```
Before:
```
shreyas.goenka@THW32HFW6T bundle-destroy % bricks bundle destroy --auto-approve
No resources to destroy!
Remote directory /Users/shreyas.goenka@databricks.com/.bundle/destroy/default will be deleted
Error: failed to destroy sync snapshot file: remove /Users/shreyas.goenka/projects/bundle-destroy/.databricks/bundle/default/sync-snapshots/a5bd1966cb8980a9.json: no such file or directory
```
## Changes
These are unlikely to ever be DBFS paths so we can remove this level of indirection to simplify.
**Note:** this is a breaking change. Downstream usage of these fields must be updated.
## Tests
Existing tests pass.
## Changes
If a configuration file is located in a subdirectory of the bundle root,
files referenced from that configuration file should be relative to its
configuration file's directory instead of the bundle root.
## Tests
* New tests in `bundle/config/mutator/translate_paths_test.go`.
* Existing tests under `bundle/tests` pass and are augmented to assert
on paths.
---------
Co-authored-by: shreyas-goenka <88374338+shreyas-goenka@users.noreply.github.com>
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
These are flows that were earlier only being tested in package
`project`. Since package `project` has been deleted in
https://github.com/databricks/bricks/pull/321, we needed to add coverage
as done here
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
This PR removes the project package and it's dependents in the bricks
repo
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
## Changes
This PR changes the files.Delete() mutator to delete the sync snapshots
file on destroy. This ensures that files will be uploaded when the
bundle is uploaded again.
## Tests
- [x] Manual test: Ran `bricks bundle destroy`, observed that the sync
snapshots file was deleted.
## Changes
This is useful when developing the Databricks Terraform provider where
you keep a local-only build of the provider and refer to it using $HOME
from `~/.terraformrc`, for example like this:
```
plugin_cache_dir = "$HOME/.terraform.d/plugin-cache"
```
## Tests
That $HOME is passed through cannot be tested as is because the
`tfexec.Terraform` struct doesn't expose it through public fields or
methods. What can be tested is a successful run of the initialize
mutator and this is included in this commit.
## Changes
Consider the following host based configuration:
```
bundle:
name: job_with_file_task
workspace:
host: https://e2-dogfood.staging.cloud.databricks.com/
```
If you have a DEFAULT profile, then this host is ignored. The solution
proposed here is to remove the profile config loader if host is
explicitly specified in the bundle config.
This does come with a cost, namely that if a `DATABRICKS_CONFIG_PROFILE`
env var will be ignored, which maybe goes against unified auth spec
The ideal solution here is probably to make a change to go-SDK to not
select DEFAULT profile if host is not empty
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
## Changes
This change also swaps the order of mutators such that interpolation
happens before path translation. This means that is is possible to use
variables (e.g. `${bundle.environment}`) in notebook or file paths.
## Tests
New tests pass and verified manually.
## Changes
This reverts commit e7a7e5b95a.
Job and pipeline runs print progress information now. No need to
continue to rely on logging for this.
## Tests
## Changes
Use `all-apis` scope, so that we can use the issued token for SCIM APIs.
The production environment has to be tuned in order to enable `all-apis`
scope for a specific account.
## Tests
Manual
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
1. Add pattern to always ignore .databricks
2. Best effort creation of .gitignore with .databricks if it's needed
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
This PR adds a bundle: "readonly" struct tag to the json schema
generator. This allows us to skip generating json schema for internal
readonly fields
Tested using unit test
## Changes
Pull state before deploying and push state after deploying.
Note: the run command was missing mutators to initialize Terraform. This
is necessary if the cache directory is removed between running "deploy"
and "run" (which is valid now that we synchronize state).
## Tests
Manually.
## Changes
The databricks_permissions resource may be generated if a bundle
resource includes a `permissions` block. There's no need to incorporate
details from the materialization into the bundle configuration struct.
## Tests
Confirmed that this fixes `bricks bundle run` when dealing with a bundle
with permission configuration.
## Changes
Auth relied on setting a profile. In this change we enumerate all
configuration properties and export all non-empty ones as a map with
environment variables. We then pass this map to the Terraform execution
wrapper.
This results in Terraform using the bundle's authentication
configuration.
This change is needed to make #287 work.
## Tests
Manually.
## Changes
This improves out of the box usability where a user who already
configured a `.databrickscfg` file will be able to reference the
workspace host in their `bundle.yml` and it will automatically pick up
the right profile.
## Tests
* Newly added tests pass.
* Manual testing confirms intended behavior.
---------
Co-authored-by: shreyas-goenka <88374338+shreyas-goenka@users.noreply.github.com>
## Changes
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
Add PR template to bring structure to PRs.
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
Copy pasted template in this description to check how it looks.
Template working in VSCode repository
## Public Tickets
<!--
Link to public tickets (if any). Please don't mention internal tickets.
-->
N/A
Add configuration:
```
bundle:
lock:
enabled: true
force: false
```
The force field can be set by passing the `--force` argument to `bricks
bundle deploy`. Doing so means the deployment lock is acquired even if
it is currently held. This should only be used in exceptional cases
(e.g. a previous deployment has failed to release the lock).
shreyas-goenka
Shreyas Goenka
Pieter Noordhuis
Miles Yucht
dependabot[bot]
Fabian Jakobs
Serge Smertin
Tanmay