## Changes
It now shows human-readable warnings and validation status.
## Tests
* Manual tests against many examples.
* Errors still return immediately.
## Changes
This adds context to warnings and errors. For example:
* Summary: `unknown field bar`
* Location: `foo.yml:6:10`
* Path: `.targets.dev.workspace`
## Tests
Unit tests.
## Changes
This diagnostics type allows us to capture multiple warnings as well as
errors in the return value. This is a preparation for returning
additional warnings from mutators in case we detect non-fatal problems.
* All return statements that previously returned an error now return
`diag.FromErr`
* All return statements that previously returned `fmt.Errorf` now return
`diag.Errorf`
* All `err != nil` checks now use `diags.HasError()` or `diags.Error()`
## Tests
* Existing tests pass.
* I confirmed no call site under `./bundle` or `./cmd/bundle` uses
`errors.Is` on the return value from mutators. This is relevant because
we cannot wrap errors with `%w` when calling `diag.Errorf` (like
`fmt.Errorf`; context in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/47641).
## Changes
The name "dynamic value", or "dyn" for short, is more descriptive than
the opaque "config". Also, it conveniently does not alias with other
packages in the repository, or (popular ones) elsewhere.
(discussed with @andrewnester)
## Tests
n/a
## Changes
This is similar to #904 but instead of converting the dynamic
configuration to Go structs, this normalizes a `config.Value` according
to the type of a Go struct and returns the new, normalized
`config.Value`.
This will be used to ensure that two `config.Value` trees are
type-compatible before we can merge them (i.e. instances from different
files).
Warnings and errors during normalization are accumulated and returned as
a `diag.Diagnostics` structure. We can use this to surface warnings
about unknown fields, or errors about invalid types, in aggregate
instead of one-by-one. This approach is inspired by the pattern to
accumulate diagnostics in Terraform provider code.
## Tests
New unit tests.
Pieter Noordhuis