This implements the "development run" functionality that we desire for DABs in the workspace / IDE.
## bundle.yml changes
In bundle.yml, there should be a "dev" environment that is marked as
`mode: debug`:
```
environments:
dev:
default: true
mode: development # future accepted values might include pull_request, production
```
Setting `mode` to `development` indicates that this environment is used
just for running things for development. This results in several changes
to deployed assets:
* All assets will get '[dev]' in their name and will get a 'dev' tag
* All assets will be hidden from the list of assets (future work; e.g.
for jobs we would have a special job_type that hides it from the list)
* All deployed assets will be ephemeral (future work, we need some form
of garbage collection)
* Pipelines will be marked as 'development: true'
* Jobs can run on development compute through the `--compute` parameter
in the CLI
* Jobs get their schedule / triggers paused
* Jobs get concurrent runs (it's really annoying if your runs get
skipped because the last run was still in progress)
Other accepted values for `mode` are `default` (which does nothing) and
`pull-request` (which is reserved for future use).
## CLI changes
To run a single job called "shark_sighting" on existing compute, use the
following commands:
```
$ databricks bundle deploy --compute 0617-201942-9yd9g8ix
$ databricks bundle run shark_sighting
```
which would deploy and run a job called "[dev] shark_sightings" on the
compute provided. Note that `--compute` is not accepted in production
environments, so we show an error if `mode: development` is not used.
The `run --deploy` command offers a convenient shorthand for the common
combination of deploying & running:
```
$ export DATABRICKS_COMPUTE=0617-201942-9yd9g8ix
$ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings
```
The `--deploy` addition isn't really essential and I welcome feedback 🤔
I played with the idea of a "debug" or "dev" command but that seemed to
only make the option space even broader for users. The above could work
well with an IDE or workspace that automatically sets the target
compute.
One more thing I added is`run --no-wait` can now be used to run
something without waiting for it to be completed (useful for IDE-like
environments that can display progress themselves).
```
$ bundle run --deploy shark_sightings --no-wait
```
## Changes
`--force` flag did not exist for `bundle destroy`. This PR adds that in.
## Tests
manually tested. Now adding the `--force` flag hijacks the deploy lock
on the target directory.
## Changes
Added support for `bundle.Seq`, simplified `Mutator.Apply` interface by
removing list of mutators from return values/
## Tests
1. Ran `cli bundle deploy` and interrupted it with Cmd + C mid execution
so lock is not released
2. Ran `cli bundle deploy` top make sure that CLI is not trying to
release lock when it fail to acquire it
```
andrew.nester@HFW9Y94129 multiples-tasks % cli bundle deploy
Starting upload of bundle files
Uploaded bundle files at /Users/andrew.nester@databricks.com/.bundle/simple-task/development/files!
^C
andrew.nester@HFW9Y94129 multiples-tasks % cli bundle deploy
Error: deploy lock acquired by andrew.nester@databricks.com at 2023-05-24 12:10:23.050343 +0200 CEST. Use --force to override
```
## Changes
Rename all instances of "bricks" to "databricks".
## Tests
* Confirmed the goreleaser build works, uses the correct new binary
name, and produces the right archives.
* Help output is confirmed to be correct.
* Output of `git grep -w bricks` is minimal with a couple changes
remaining for after the repository rename.
## Changes
This PR now allows you to define variables in the bundle config and set
them in three ways
1. command line args
2. process environment variable
3. in the bundle config itself
## Tests
manually, unit, and black box tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Miles Yucht <miles@databricks.com>
Add configuration:
```
bundle:
lock:
enabled: true
force: false
```
The force field can be set by passing the `--force` argument to `bricks
bundle deploy`. Doing so means the deployment lock is acquired even if
it is currently held. This should only be used in exceptional cases
(e.g. a previous deployment has failed to release the lock).
We intend to let non-bundle commands use bundle configuration for their
operating context (workspace, auth, default cluster, etc).
As such, all commands must first try to load a bundle configuration.
If there is no bundle they can fall back on taking their operating
context from command line flags and the environment.
This is on top of #180.
Lennart Kats (databricks)
shreyas-goenka
Andrew Nester
Pieter Noordhuis