## Changes
The databricks terraform provider does not allow changing permission of
the current user. Instead, the current identity is implictly set to be
the owner of all resources on the platform side.
This PR introduces a mutator to filter permissions from the bundle
configuration at deploy time, allowing users to define permissions for
their own identities in their bundle config.
This would allow configurations like, allowing both alice and bob to
collaborate on the same DAB:
```
permissions:
level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: alice
level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: bob
```
This PR is a reincarnation of
https://github.com/databricks/cli/pull/1145. The earlier attempt had to
be reverted due to metadata loss converting to and from the dynamic
configuration representation (reverted here:
https://github.com/databricks/cli/pull/1179)
## Tests
Unit test and manually
## Changes
This reverts commit 4131069a4b.
The integration test for metadata computation failed. The back and forth
to `dyn.Value` erases unexported fields that the code currently still
depends on. We'll have to retry on top of #1098.
## Changes
The databricks terraform provider does not allow changing permission of
the current user. Instead, the current identity is implictly set to be
the owner of all resources on the platform side.
This PR introduces a mutator to filter permissions from the bundle
configuration, allowing users to define permissions for their own
identities in their bundle config.
This would allow configurations like, allowing both alice and bob to
collaborate on the same DAB:
```
permissions:
level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: alice
level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: bob
```
## Tests
Unit test and manually
## Changes
The code relied on the `Name` property being accessible for every
resource. This is generally true, but because these property structs are
embedded as pointer, they can be nil. This is also why the tests had to
initialize the embedded struct to pass. This changes the approach to use
the keys from the resource map instead, so that we no longer rely on the
non-nil embedded struct.
Note: we should evaluate whether we should turn these into values
instead of pointers. I don't recall if we get value from them being
pointers.
## Tests
Unit tests pass.
## Changes
Now it's possible to define top level `permissions` section in bundle
configuration and permissions defined there will be applied to all
resources defined in the bundle.
Supported top-level permission levels: CAN_MANAGE, CAN_VIEW, CAN_RUN.
Permissions are applied to: Jobs, DLT Pipelines, ML Models, ML
Experiments and Model Service Endpoints
```
bundle:
name: permissions
workspace:
host: ***
permissions:
- level: CAN_VIEW
group_name: test-group
- level: CAN_MANAGE
user_name: user@company.com
- level: CAN_RUN
service_principal_name: 123456-abcdef
```
## Tests
Added corresponding unit tests + ran `bundle validate` and `bundle
deploy` manually
shreyas-goenka
Pieter Noordhuis
Andrew Nester