The tests in acceptance/bundle/template focus on standard templates. The
plan is to extend them with "bundle deploy" and enable them on the
cloud.
The tests in acceptance/bundle/template-machinery focus on specific
aspects of template implementation. Most of them are expected to remain
local-only.
## Changes
When there are many unexpected files, it's good to see them as a list
rather than scattered throughout the output.
<!-- Summary of your changes that are easy to understand -->
## Tests
Manually, example output:
```
acceptance_test.go:363: Test produced unexpected files:
output/my_default_sql/.databricks/bundle/dev/sync-snapshots/71c79ded90615dc7.json
output/my_default_sql/.databricks/bundle/dev/terraform/.terraform/providers/registry.terraform.io/databricks/databricks/1.64.1/darwin_arm64
output/my_default_sql/.databricks/bundle/dev/terraform/plan
output/my_default_sql/.databricks/bundle/prod/sync-snapshots/83e677e75259c93b.json
output/my_default_sql/.databricks/bundle/prod/terraform/.terraform/providers/registry.terraform.io/databricks/databricks/1.64.1/darwin_arm64
```
For acceptance/bundle/templates I'd like to run "bundle deploy". This
would create .databricks directory inside materialized output. It might
makes sense to commit some of this as part of golden files output. Even
if we did not commit anything, the test runner will see those files and
show the difference. Thus git should also see them.
Also rename .gitignore to out.gitignore in those tests, since that
includes .databricks as well.
## Changes
This will generate bundle YAML configuration for Git based jobs but
won't download any related files as they are in Git repo.
Fixes#1423
## Tests
Added unit test
---------
Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pieter.noordhuis@databricks.com>
## Changes
`CreatePipeline` is a more complete structure (superset of PipelineSpec
one) which enables support of additional fields such as `run_as` and
`allow_duplicate_names` in DABs configuration. Note: these fields are
subject to support in TF in order to correctly work.
## Tests
Existing tests pass + no fields are removed from JSON schema
## Changes
Instead of using leaf-most config, all configs from root at
acceptance/test.toml to all intermediate ones to leaf config are merged
into one. Maps are merged, slices are appended, other values are
overridden.
I had to disable caching, because it is tricky when merging is involved
- deep copy is needed. There is performance
impact but currently it is tiny, about 1%.
Also, remove empty root config.
## Tests
Manually checked that inheritance of LocalOnly setting worked for these
tests:
Before - integration tests showed:
```
PASS acceptance.TestAccept/bundle/templates/wrong-url (0.70s)
PASS acceptance.TestAccept/bundle/templates/wrong-path (0.44s)
```
After:
```
SKIP acceptance.TestAccept/bundle/templates/wrong-url (0.00s)
SKIP acceptance.TestAccept/bundle/templates/wrong-path (0.00s)
acceptance_test.go:216: Disabled via LocalOnly setting in bundle/templates/test.toml, bundle/templates/wrong-path/test.toml (CLOUD_ENV=***)
```
## Changes
This PR fails the acceptance test when an unknown endpoint (i.e. not
stubbed) is used. We want to ensure that all API endpoints used in an
acceptance test are stubbed and do not otherwise silently fail with a
404.
The logs on failure output include a configuration that developers can
simply copy-paste to `test.toml` to stub the missing API endpoint. It'll
look something like:
```
[[Server]]
Pattern = "<method> <path>"
Response.Body = '''
<response body here>
'''
Response.StatusCode = <response status-code here>
```
## Tests
Manually:
output.txt when an endpoint is not found:
```
>>> [CLI] jobs create --json {"name":"abc"}
Error: No stub found for pattern: POST /api/2.1/jobs/create
```
How this renders in the test logs:
```
--- FAIL: TestAccept/workspace/jobs/create (0.03s)
server.go:46:
----------------------------------------
No stub found for pattern: POST /api/2.1/jobs/create
To stub a response for this request, you can add
the following to test.toml:
[[Server]]
Pattern = "POST /api/2.1/jobs/create"
Response.Body = '''
<response body here>
'''
Response.StatusCode = <response status-code here>
----------------------------------------
```
Manually checked that the debug mode still works.
## Changes
The intent of this PR is to clarify that the `databricks auth token`
command is not supported for M2M auth. Fixes:
https://github.com/databricks/cli/issues/1939
## Tests
Manually.
## Changes
- Print warnings and errors by default.
- Fix ErrAlreadyPrinted not to be logged at Error level.
- Format log messages as "Warn: message" instead of "WARN" to make it
more readable and in-line with the rest of the output.
- Only print attributes (pid, mutator, etc) and time when the overall
level is debug (so --debug output has not changed much).
## Tests
- Existing acceptance tests show how warning messages appear in various
test case.
- Added new test for `--debug` output.
- Add sort_lines.py helper to avoid dependency on 'sort' which is
locale-sensitive.
## Changes
Extend testserver for bundle deployment:
- Allocate a new workspace per test case to isolate test cases from each
other
- Support jobs get/list/create
- Support creation and listing of workspace files
## Tests
Using existing acceptance tests
## Changes
1. Allow `any` examples in json-schema type since we have many of them
in open api spec
2. Fix issue with missing overrides annotations when re-generating the
schema
## Tests
<!-- How is this tested? -->
## Changes
Added support for extras / optional Python dependencies in the labs CLI.
Added new `extras` field under install.
Example:
```yaml
install:
script: install.py
extras: cli
```
Resolves: #2257
## Tests
Manual test
## Changes
HTTP headers like the User-Agent are an important part of our internal
ETL pipelines. This PR adds the ability to validate the headers used in
an HTTP request as part of our acceptance tests.
## Tests
Modifying existing test.
#2201 disabled using JSON as part of a bundle definition. I believe this
was not intended.
## Changes
Accept json files as includes, just as YAML files.
## Tests
Covered by the tests in #2201
## Changes
The APIs at Databricks when returning a non `200` status code will
return a response body of the format:
```
{
"error_code": "Error code",
"message": "Human-readable error message."
}
```
This PR adds the ability to stub non-200 status codes in the test
server, allowing us to mock API errors from Databricks.
## Tests
New test