## Changes
Due to platform changes, all libraries, notebooks and etc. paths used in
Databricks must be started with either /Workspace or /Volumes prefix.
This PR makes sure that all bundle paths are correctly prefixed.
Note: this change is a breaking change if user previously configured and
used `/Workspace/Workspace` folder in their workspace file system or
having `/Workspace/${workspace.root_path}...` pattern configured
anywhere in their bundle config
Fixes: #1751
AI:
- [x] Scan DABs config and error out on
`/Workspace/${workspace.root_path}...` pattern usage
## Tests
Added unit tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pieter.noordhuis@databricks.com>
## Changes
Default workspace path for resources with a presence in the workspace
tree.
Note: this path is **not** created automatically (yet). We need this
only for dashboards (so far), so can take care of creation if one or
more dashboards are part of a deployment. This saves an API call for
deployments where this is not necessary.
## Tests
Expanded existing tests.
## Changes
Currently API limits on exporting files from workspaces are set at 10
MBs while uploading to is 500 MBs. We want to prevent users running into
deadlock when they won't be able to pull state file anymore so we
prevent from uploading large state files (over 10 MBs) to Databricks
workspace.
## Changes
This fixes the user-reported panic in `apply_presets.go`. I'm still
unsure how to reproduce this, since the CLI just reports `ob broken_job
is not defined` when I try to use `bundle deploy` with an empty job.
That said — we may as well be defensive here and I see we have lots of
checks for empty job/cluster/etc. settings scattered throughout our code
base so at least we're somewhat consistent.
## Changes
After introducing the `SyncRootPath` field on the bundle (#1694), the
previous `RootPath` became ambiguous. Does it mean the bundle root path
or the sync root path? This PR renames to field to `BundleRootPath` to
remove the ambiguity.
## Tests
n/a
---------
Co-authored-by: shreyas-goenka <88374338+shreyas-goenka@users.noreply.github.com>
## Changes
Sort the tasks in the resultant `bundle.tf.json`. This is important
because configuration from one task can leak into another if the tasks
are not sorted.
For more details see:
1.
https://github.com/databricks/terraform-provider-databricks/issues/3951
2.
https://github.com/databricks/terraform-provider-databricks/issues/4011
## Tests
Unit test and manually.
For manual testing I used the following configuration:
```
resources:
jobs:
foo:
tasks:
- task_key: task-Z
notebook_task:
notebook_path: nb.py
source: GIT
existing_cluster_id: 0715-133738-ju0ma84z
- task_key: task-1
notebook_task:
notebook_path: ${workspace.file_path}/local.py
source: WORKSPACE
existing_cluster_id: 0715-133738-ju0ma84z
depends_on:
- task_key: task-Z
git_source:
git_provider: gitHub
git_url: https://github.com/shreyas-goenka/job-source-tmp.git
git_branch: main
```
Steps (1):
1. Deploy this bundle.
2. Comment out "source: GIT"
3. Deploy again
Before:
Deploying this bundle twice would fail. This is because the "source:
GIT" would carry over to the next deployment.
After:
There was no error on the subsequent deployment.
Steps (2):
1. Deploy once
2. Deploy again
Before:
Works correctly but leads to a update API call every time.
After:
No diff is detected by terraform.
Bumps [golang.org/x/mod](https://github.com/golang/mod) from 0.20.0 to
0.21.0.
<details>
<summary>Commits</summary>
<ul>
<li><a
href="46a3137dae"><code>46a3137</code></a>
zip: set GIT_DIR in test when using bare repositories</li>
<li><a
href="3afcd4e90a"><code>3afcd4e</code></a>
go.mod: set go version to 1.22.0</li>
<li><a
href="b1d336cfca"><code>b1d336c</code></a>
go.mod: update required go version to go1.22</li>
<li>See full diff in <a
href="https://github.com/golang/mod/compare/v0.20.0...v0.21.0">compare
view</a></li>
</ul>
</details>
<br />
[data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/19697/1969760dc068687ca874f461319ce13757451482" alt="Dependabot compatibility
score"](https://docs.github.com/en/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/about-dependabot-security-updates#about-compatibility-scores)
Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't
alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
`@dependabot rebase`.
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-start)
[//]: # (dependabot-automerge-end)
---
<details>
<summary>Dependabot commands and options</summary>
<br />
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
- `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR
- `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits
that have been made to it
- `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after
your CI passes on it
- `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge
and block automerging
- `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed
- `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating
it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
- `@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions` will show all
of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
- `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen
the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
- `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop
Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the
PR or upgrade to it yourself)
</details>
---------
Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrew Nester <andrew.nester@databricks.com>
Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pieter.noordhuis@databricks.com>
I plan to use this in https://github.com/databricks/cli/pull/1780, to
set the line and column numbers as well for the locations.
gopatch file used:
```
@@
var x expression
var y expression
var z expression
@@
-bundletest.SetLocation(x, y, z)
+bundletest.SetLocation(x, y, []dyn.Location{{File: z}})
```
## Changes
We want to encourage a pattern of only specifying a single resource in a
YAML file when an `.<resource-type>.yml` (like `.job.yml`) is used. This
convention could allow us to bijectively map a resource YAML file to
it's corresponding resource in the Databricks workspace.
This PR simply makes the built-in templates compliant to this format.
## Tests
Existing tests.
## Changes
Add JobTaskClusterSpec validate mutator. It catches the case when tasks
don't which cluster to use.
For example, we can get this error with minor modifications to
`default-python` template:
```yaml
tasks:
- task_key: python_file_task
spark_python_task:
python_file: ../src/my_project_10/main.py
```
```
% databricks bundle validate
Error: Missing required cluster or environment settings
at resources.jobs.my_project_10_job.tasks[0]
in resources/my_project_10_job.yml:17:11
Task "print_github_stars" requires a cluster or an environment to run.
Specify one of the following fields: job_cluster_key, environment_key, existing_cluster_id, new_cluster.
```
We implicitly rely on "one of" validation, which does not exist. Many
bundle fields can't co-exist, for instance, specifying:
`JobTask.{existing_cluster_id,job_cluster_key}`, `Library.{whl,pypi}`,
`JobTask.{notebook_task,python_wheel_task}`, etc.
## Tests
Unit tests
---------
Co-authored-by: Pieter Noordhuis <pcnoordhuis@gmail.com>